AVTR vs BDX Stock Comparison
BDX currently leads AVTR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 59 vs 58. The clearest difference is quality, while AVTR has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between AVTR and BDX?
BDX leads the current stock comparison as Becton, Dickinson and Company, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Avantor, Inc. vs Becton, Dickinson and Company
BDX leads
BDX leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from AVTR.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support BDX, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Avantor, Inc.
Becton, Dickinson and Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BDX over AVTR, 59 versus 58 as of Oct 31, 2026. BDX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while AVTR holds the stronger risk resilience profile. BDX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BDX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. BDX lead: Reversed — AVTR led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BDX now leads by 1.
Compare Avantor, Inc. and Becton, Dickinson and Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AVTR and BDX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience62 vs 49AVTR +13
- Quality34 vs 44BDX +10
- Momentum78 vs 80Even
- Value63 vs 63Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor BDX. BDX’s edge is concentrated in quality; AVTR keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
BDX's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AVTR and BDX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BDX (Becton, Dickinson and Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
AVTR (Avantor, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 27.8% against 21.9%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BDXBDX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BDXBDX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
AVTRAVTR on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
BDXBDX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AVTR | BDX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -28.3% | -4.4% | BDX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +78.3% | +23.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BDX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 58 vs 59 |
| Fundamentals | BDXon balance | revenue growth 7% vs 5.7%; EPS growth -6.1% vs 223.4%; TTM ROE -10.3% vs 3.8%; gross margin 31.8% vs 46.1%; operating margin -4.4% vs 9.8% — BDX takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 63 vs 63 |
| Technicals | AVTR | Price vs 50-day 4.2% vs 6.3%; vs 200-day 49.6% vs 15% |
| Risk Resilience | AVTR | Risk Resilience 62 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | BDX | Target upside -28.3% vs -4.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AVTR and BDX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BDX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28BDX lead: Reversed — AVTR led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BDX now leads by 1.
- Today
- BDX +1
- 58 vs 59
- 7 sessions ago
- BDX +1
- 59 vs 60
- 30 sessions ago
- AVTR +2
- 52 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- AVTR +2
- 61 vs 59
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Oct 8 when BDX moved ahead of AVTR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only AVTR
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.3%)
4 bullish / 0 bearish
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.78%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.23%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AVTR closes the Quality gap — currently 10 points behind, the largest single contributor to BDX's edge.
- 2AVTR's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3BDX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BDX leads on balance| Metric | AVTR | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7% | 5.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -6.1% | 223.4% |
| Gross margin | 31.8% | 46.1% |
| Operating margin | -4.4% | 9.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.3% | 3.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.66 | 0.69 |
Performance
AVTR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | AVTR | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.3% | 0.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 10.9% | 9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 20.4% | 18% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 112.6% | 30.7% |
| Year to date | 45.6% | 0.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 8.4% | 5% |
Technicals
AVTR has the stronger structure| Metric | AVTR | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 69.5 | 69.2 |
| ADX (14) | 40.1 | 35 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.2% | 6.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 49.6% | 15% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 27.8% | 21.9% |
Risk
AVTR is the more resilient| Metric | AVTR | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.8 | 0.33 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.38 | 0.22 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.48 | 0.27 |
| Max drawdown | -50.9% | -33% |
| Current drawdown | -3.5% | -7.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 49.6% | 31% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.9% | -2.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AVTR or BDX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BDX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 59 against AVTR's 58. The edge comes from quality. AVTR is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AVTR or BDX the better buy right now?
BDX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BDX over AVTR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. AVTR leads Risk Resilience by 13 points; BDX leads Quality by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AVTR or BDX?
Analyst price targets imply -28.3% upside for AVTR and -4.4% for BDX, so the Street currently favors BDX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AVTR or BDX?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AVTR or BDX?
BDX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AVTR or BDX?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AVTR or BDX?
AVTR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AVTR on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AVTR more profitable than BDX?
BDX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 31.8% vs 46.1%; operating margin -4.4% vs 9.8%; ttm roe -10.3% vs 3.8%.
Is BDX's lead over AVTR getting stronger or weaker?
BDX lead: Reversed — AVTR led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BDX now leads by 1. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-08, when BDX moved ahead of AVTR.
What would change the AVTR vs BDX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AVTR closes the Quality gap — currently 10 points behind, the largest single contributor to BDX's edge; AVTR's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; BDX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AVTR and BDX?
AVTR: 5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. BDX: 4 bullish / 0 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on AVTR is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On BDX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AVTR and BDX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.