AVTR vs BDX Stock Comparison
Compare AVTR and BDX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between AVTR and BDX?
AVTR leads the current stock comparison as Avantor, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Avantor, Inc. vs Becton, Dickinson and Company
AVTR leads
AVTR leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from BDX. Wall Street currently favors BDX on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support AVTR, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Avantor, Inc.
Becton, Dickinson and Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AVTR over BDX, 55 versus 48 as of Sep 12, 2026. AVTR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while BDX holds the stronger quality profile. AVTR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BDX. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AVTR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. AVTR lead: Reversed — BDX led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AVTR now leads by 7.
Compare Avantor, Inc. and Becton, Dickinson and Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare AVTR and BDX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum66 vs 37AVTR +29
- Risk Resilience60 vs 47AVTR +13
- Quality34 vs 44BDX +10
- Value64 vs 63Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor AVTR. AVTR’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; BDX keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-11, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-10.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
New signals
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.30%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
AVTR's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AVTR and BDX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AVTR (Avantor, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
BDX (Becton, Dickinson and Company): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AVTRAVTR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BDXBDX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
AVTRAVTR on the Momentum factor, by 29 points.
Lower downside
AVTRAVTR on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
BDXBDX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors AVTR, analyst targets favor BDX. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AVTR | BDX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -28.4% | +4% | BDX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +66% | +27.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AVTR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AVTR | 55 vs 48 |
| Fundamentals | BDXon balance | revenue growth 7% vs 5.7%; EPS growth -6.1% vs 223.4%; TTM ROE -10.3% vs 3.8%; gross margin 31.8% vs 46.1%; operating margin -4.4% vs 9.8% — BDX takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 64 vs 63 |
| Technicals | AVTR | Price vs 50-day 13.9% vs 3.4%; vs 200-day 41.8% vs 3.7% |
| Risk Resilience | AVTR | Risk Resilience 60 vs 47 |
| Analyst expectations | BDX | Target upside -28.4% vs 4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AVTR and BDX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AVTR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 11AVTR lead: Reversed — BDX led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AVTR now leads by 7.
- Today
- AVTR +7
- 55 vs 48
- 7 sessions ago
- AVTR +3
- 58 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- BDX +1
- 58 vs 59
- 90 sessions ago
- AVTR +1
- 55 vs 54
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (24.53%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
4 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.30%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
AVTR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.47%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.81%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BDX closes the Momentum gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to AVTR's edge.
- 2BDX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3AVTR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BDX leads on balance| Metric | AVTR | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7% | 5.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -6.1% | 223.4% |
| Gross margin | 31.8% | 46.1% |
| Operating margin | -4.4% | 9.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.3% | 3.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.66 | 0.69 |
Performance
AVTR leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | AVTR | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.5% | -5.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 6.9% | -2.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 53.3% | 20.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 83.9% | 11.4% |
| Year to date | 29.2% | -8.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 15.4% | -6.6% |
Technicals
AVTR has the stronger structure| Metric | AVTR | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 56.1 | 19.3 |
| ADX (14) | 46 | 37.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 13.9% | 3.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | 41.8% | 3.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 31.8% | 23.2% |
Risk
AVTR is the more resilient| Metric | AVTR | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.92 | 0.4 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.5 | -0.16 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.65 | -0.19 |
| Max drawdown | -52.5% | -33% |
| Current drawdown | -5.1% | -15.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 51.6% | 30.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.1% | -2.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AVTR or BDX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AVTR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 12, 2026, scoring 55 against BDX's 48. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. BDX is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AVTR or BDX the better buy right now?
AVTR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 12, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AVTR over BDX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. AVTR leads Momentum by 29 points; AVTR leads Risk Resilience by 13 points; BDX leads Quality by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AVTR or BDX?
Analyst price targets imply -28.4% upside for AVTR and +4% for BDX, so the Street currently favors BDX. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors AVTR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AVTR or BDX?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AVTR or BDX?
BDX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AVTR or BDX?
AVTR on the Momentum factor, by 29 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AVTR or BDX?
AVTR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AVTR on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AVTR more profitable than BDX?
BDX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 31.8% vs 46.1%; operating margin -4.4% vs 9.8%; ttm roe -10.3% vs 3.8%.
Is AVTR's lead over BDX getting stronger or weaker?
AVTR lead: Reversed — BDX led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AVTR now leads by 7. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-11. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the AVTR vs BDX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BDX closes the Momentum gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to AVTR's edge; BDX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover; AVTR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AVTR and BDX?
AVTR: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. BDX: 4 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AVTR is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On BDX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AVTR and BDX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.