AVY vs SEE Stock Comparison
Compare AVY and SEE across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between AVY and SEE?
SEE leads the current stock comparison as Sealed Air Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Avery Dennison Corporation vs Sealed Air Corporation
SEE leads
SEE leads by 11 AIQ points, primarily on Value, having only recently taken the lead back from AVY. Wall Street currently favors AVY on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SEE, and the lead recently changed hands.
Avery Dennison Corporation
Sealed Air Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SEE over AVY, 54 versus 43 as of Sep 11, 2026. SEE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while AVY holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SEE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AVY. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SEE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. SEE lead: Reversed — AVY led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SEE now leads by 11.
Compare Avery Dennison Corporation and Sealed Air Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare AVY and SEE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value48 vs 57SEE +9
- Risk Resilience57 vs 49AVY +8
- Quality50 vs 53Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SEE. SEE’s edge is concentrated in value; AVY keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
SEE's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AVY and SEE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SEE (Sealed Air Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
AVY (Avery Dennison Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 21.5% against 2.3%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SEESEE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AVYAVY on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SEESEE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
AVYAVY on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
AVYAVY on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SEE, analyst targets favor AVY. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AVY | SEE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +22.4% | -0.4% | AVY has more room |
| Target dispersion | +24.1% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SEE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SEE | 43 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | SEEon balance | revenue growth 7.2% vs 3.7%; EPS growth 22.5% vs -38.9%; TTM ROE 31.1% vs 48.4%; gross margin 29% vs 29.8%; operating margin 12.4% vs 13.5% — SEE takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SEE | Value 48 vs 57 |
| Technicals | SEE | Price vs 50-day -0.6% vs 0.5%; vs 200-day -2.5% vs 13% |
| Risk Resilience | AVY | Risk Resilience 57 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | AVY | Target upside 22.4% vs -0.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AVY and SEE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 11 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SEE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SEE lead: Reversed — AVY led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SEE now leads by 11.
- Today
- SEE +11
- 43 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- SEE +2
- 52 vs 54
- 30 sessions ago
- AVY +2
- 56 vs 54
- 90 sessions ago
- AVY +1
- 55 vs 54
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Jul 28 when AVY moved ahead of SEE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.57%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
No active signals
AVY is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.36%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AVY closes the Value gap — currently 9 points behind, the largest single contributor to SEE's edge.
- 2AVY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SEE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SEE leads on balance| Metric | AVY | SEE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7.2% | 3.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 22.5% | -38.9% |
| Gross margin | 29% | 29.8% |
| Operating margin | 12.4% | 13.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 31.1% | 48.4% |
| Debt to equity | 1.58 | 3.31 |
Performance
SEE leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | AVY | SEE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.2% | 0.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -6.8% | 0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 8.1% | 1.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -3.3% | 15% |
| Year to date | -7.2% | 1.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 0.2% | 47.7% |
Technicals
SEE has the stronger structure| Metric | AVY | SEE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 24.7 | 81.2 |
| ADX (14) | 25.3 | 14.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.6% | 0.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -2.5% | 13% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 21.5% | 2.3% |
Risk
AVY is the more resilient| Metric | AVY | SEE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.48 | -0.14 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.02 | 1.96 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.04 | 4.43 |
| Max drawdown | -22.5% | -8.6% |
| Current drawdown | -14.5% | -2.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 25.6% | 28% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -1.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AVY or SEE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SEE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 54 against AVY's 43. The edge comes from value. AVY is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AVY or SEE the better buy right now?
SEE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SEE over AVY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SEE leads Value by 9 points; AVY leads Risk Resilience by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AVY or SEE?
Analyst price targets imply +22.4% upside for AVY and -0.4% for SEE, so the Street currently favors AVY. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SEE. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AVY or SEE?
SEE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SEE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AVY or SEE?
AVY on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AVY or SEE?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AVY or SEE?
AVY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AVY on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AVY more profitable than SEE?
SEE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 29% vs 29.8%; operating margin 12.4% vs 13.5%; ttm roe 31.1% vs 48.4%.
Is SEE's lead over AVY getting stronger or weaker?
SEE lead: Reversed — AVY led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SEE now leads by 11. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-28, when AVY moved ahead of SEE.
What would change the AVY vs SEE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AVY closes the Value gap — currently 9 points behind, the largest single contributor to SEE's edge; AVY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SEE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AVY and SEE?
AVY: 1 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. SEE: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AVY is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare AVY and SEE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.