AXON vs VSEC Stock Comparison
Compare AXON and VSEC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between AXON and VSEC?
VSEC leads the current stock comparison as VSE Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Axon Enterprise, Inc. vs VSE Corporation
VSEC leads
VSEC leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from AXON. Wall Street currently favors AXON on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support VSEC, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
VSE Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors VSEC over AXON, 34 versus 32 as of Sep 11, 2026. VSEC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while AXON holds the stronger quality profile. VSEC also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AXON. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VSEC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. VSEC lead: Reversed — AXON led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; VSEC now leads by 2.
Compare Axon Enterprise, Inc. and VSE Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare AXON and VSEC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality55 vs 35AXON +20
- Value24 vs 36VSEC +12
- Momentum8 vs 19VSEC +11
- Risk Resilience44 vs 51VSEC +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor VSEC. VSEC’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; AXON keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No new signals fired.
VSEC's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AXON and VSEC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
VSEC (VSE Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
AXON (Axon Enterprise, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 58.4% against 50.7%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
VSECVSEC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
VSECVSEC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
VSECVSEC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points.
Momentum
VSECVSEC on the Momentum factor, by 11 points.
Lower downside
VSECVSEC on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
AXONAXON on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors VSEC, analyst targets favor AXON. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AXON | VSEC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +32.9% | +29.7% | AXON has more room |
| Target dispersion | +48.6% | +31.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VSEC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 32 vs 34 |
| Fundamentals | VSECon balance | revenue growth 12% vs 38.4%; EPS growth -82.9% vs -13.2%; TTM ROE 5.9% vs 3.7%; gross margin 59.4% vs 14%; operating margin 2.6% vs 11.2% — VSEC takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | VSEC | Value 24 vs 36 |
| Technicals | VSEC | Price vs 50-day -15.2% vs -8.3%; vs 200-day -5.2% vs -2.8% |
| Risk Resilience | VSEC | Risk Resilience 44 vs 51 |
| Analyst expectations | AXON | Target upside 32.9% vs 29.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AXON and VSEC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on VSEC.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10VSEC lead: Reversed — AXON led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; VSEC now leads by 2.
- Today
- VSEC +2
- 32 vs 34
- 7 sessions ago
- AXON +1
- 35 vs 34
- 30 sessions ago
- AXON +5
- 53 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- AXON +7
- 54 vs 47
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Sep 8 when VSEC moved ahead of AXON.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (12.00%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.29%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.20%)
VSEC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.1%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.21%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AXON closes the Value gap — currently 12 points behind, the largest single contributor to VSEC's edge.
- 2AXON's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3VSEC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
VSEC leads on balance| Metric | AXON | VSEC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 12% | 38.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -82.9% | -13.2% |
| Gross margin | 59.4% | 14% |
| Operating margin | 2.6% | 11.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 5.9% | 3.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.5 | 0.35 |
Performance
VSEC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | AXON | VSEC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.5% | -2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -20.2% | -20.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 7% | 11.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -7.5% | -10.5% |
| Year to date | -15.7% | 11.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -35.3% | 17.3% |
Technicals
VSEC has the stronger structure| Metric | AXON | VSEC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 24.3 | 34.8 |
| ADX (14) | 22 | 18.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -15.2% | -8.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -5.2% | -2.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 58.4% | 50.7% |
Risk
VSEC is the more resilient| Metric | AXON | VSEC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.64 | 2.32 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.44 | 0.51 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.65 | 0.84 |
| Max drawdown | -55.5% | -30.4% |
| Current drawdown | -38.4% | -20.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 62% | 58.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.1% | -5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AXON or VSEC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, VSEC is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 34 against AXON's 32. The edge comes from value and momentum. AXON is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AXON or VSEC the better buy right now?
VSEC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor VSEC over AXON?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. AXON leads Quality by 20 points; VSEC leads Value by 12 points; VSEC leads Momentum by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AXON or VSEC?
Analyst price targets imply +32.9% upside for AXON and +29.7% for VSEC, so the Street currently favors AXON. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors VSEC. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AXON or VSEC?
VSEC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. VSEC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AXON or VSEC?
VSEC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AXON or VSEC?
VSEC on the Momentum factor, by 11 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AXON or VSEC?
VSEC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. VSEC on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AXON more profitable than VSEC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 59.4% vs 14%; operating margin 2.6% vs 11.2%; ttm roe 5.9% vs 3.7%. AXON leads on two measures and VSEC on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is VSEC's lead over AXON getting stronger or weaker?
VSEC lead: Reversed — AXON led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; VSEC now leads by 2. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-08, when VSEC moved ahead of AXON.
What would change the AXON vs VSEC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AXON closes the Value gap — currently 12 points behind, the largest single contributor to VSEC's edge; AXON's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; VSEC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AXON and VSEC?
AXON: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. VSEC: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AXON is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On VSEC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AXON and VSEC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.