BANR vs BPOP Stock Comparison
Banner Corporation vs Popular, Inc.
BANR leads
BANR leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors BPOP on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support BANR, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Banner Corporation
Popular, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BANR over BPOP, 60 versus 56 as of Sep 5, 2026. BANR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and momentum, while BPOP holds the stronger value profile. BANR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BPOP. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BANR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. BANR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Banner Corporation and Popular, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare BANR and BPOP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience15%80 vs 62BANR +18
- Momentum25%50 vs 35BANR +15
- Value30%50 vs 56BPOP +6
- Quality30%67 vs 72BPOP +5
2 of 6 evidence groups favor BANR. BANR’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and momentum; BPOP keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -11
No new signals fired.
BANR's lead widened by 4 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BANR and BPOP both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BANR (Banner Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and momentum.
BPOP (Popular, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, quality, fundamentals.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BANRBANR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
BPOPBPOP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BPOPBPOP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
BANRBANR on the Momentum factor, by 15 points.
Lower downside
BANRBANR on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
BPOPBPOP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BANR, analyst targets favor BPOP. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BANR | BPOP | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +6.8% | +9.5% | BPOP has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +16.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BANR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BANR | 60 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | BPOPon balance | revenue growth -72.8% vs 4.7%; EPS growth -11.2% vs 15.1%; TTM ROE 10.7% vs 15.4%; gross margin 77.7% vs 69%; operating margin 19.4% vs 25.4% — BPOP takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | BPOP | Value 50 vs 56 |
| Technicals | BPOP | Price vs 50-day 1.5% vs 0%; vs 200-day 9.1% vs 17.4% |
| Risk Resilience | BANR | Risk Resilience 80 vs 62 |
| Analyst expectations | BPOP | Target upside 6.8% vs 9.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BANR and BPOP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BANR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4BANR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BANR +4
- 60 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- BANR +5
- 61 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- BANR +2
- 67 vs 65
- 90 sessions ago
- BPOP +3
- 64 vs 67
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on May 13 when BPOP moved ahead of BANR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.48%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.44%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
BANR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.04%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.01%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BPOP closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to BANR's edge.
- 2BPOP's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3BANR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BPOP leads on balance| Metric | BANR | BPOP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -72.8% | 4.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -11.2% | 15.1% |
| Gross margin | 77.7% | 69% |
| Operating margin | 19.4% | 25.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.7% | 15.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.27 | 0.25 |
Performance
BPOP leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | BANR | BPOP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.7% | -1.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 9.7% | 11.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 17.7% | 31% |
| Year to date | 13.5% | 37.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 6.7% | 35.8% |
Technicals
BPOP has the stronger structure| Metric | BANR | BPOP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.8 | 34.6 |
| ADX (14) | 14.5 | 22.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.5% | 0% |
| Price vs 200-day | 9.1% | 17.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 18.8% | 15.6% |
Risk
BANR is the more resilient| Metric | BANR | BPOP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.44 | 0.72 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.16 | 1.19 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.23 | 1.64 |
| Max drawdown | -14.3% | -14.7% |
| Current drawdown | -3.9% | -3.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 24.5% | 24.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -2.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BANR or BPOP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BANR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 60 against BPOP's 56. The edge comes from risk resilience and momentum. BPOP is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BANR or BPOP the better buy right now?
BANR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BANR over BPOP?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. BANR leads Risk Resilience by 18 points; BANR leads Momentum by 15 points; BPOP leads Value by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BANR or BPOP?
Analyst price targets imply +6.8% upside for BANR and +9.5% for BPOP, so the Street currently favors BPOP. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BANR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BANR or BPOP?
BPOP is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BPOP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BANR or BPOP?
BPOP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BANR or BPOP?
BANR on the Momentum factor, by 15 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BANR or BPOP?
BANR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BANR on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BANR more profitable than BPOP?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 77.7% vs 69%; operating margin 19.4% vs 25.4%; ttm roe 10.7% vs 15.4%. BANR leads on one measure and BPOP on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is BANR's lead over BPOP getting stronger or weaker?
BANR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-23 and 2026-09-04. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-05-13, when BPOP moved ahead of BANR.
What would change the BANR vs BPOP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BPOP closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to BANR's edge; BPOP's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; BANR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BANR and BPOP?
BANR: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. BPOP: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BANR is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On BPOP it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BANR and BPOP with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.