BAX vs BDX Stock Comparison
Compare BAX and BDX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BAX and BDX?
BDX leads the current stock comparison as Becton, Dickinson and Company, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Baxter International Inc. vs Becton, Dickinson and Company
BDX leads
BDX leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, but the lead has narrowed from 11 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support BDX, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Baxter International Inc.
Becton, Dickinson and Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BDX over BAX, 48 versus 43 as of Sep 11, 2026. BDX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while BAX holds the stronger risk resilience profile. BDX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BDX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. BDX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Baxter International Inc. and Becton, Dickinson and Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BAX and BDX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality20 vs 44BDX +24
- Risk Resilience54 vs 46BAX +8
- Value69 vs 63BAX +6
- Momentum31 vs 37BDX +6
2 of 6 evidence groups favor BDX. BDX’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; BAX keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
BDX's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BAX and BDX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BDX (Becton, Dickinson and Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
BAX (Baxter International Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BDXBDX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BDXBDX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BAXBAX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
BDXBDX on the Momentum factor, by 6 points.
Lower downside
BAXBAX on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BAX | BDX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +4.3% | +4% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +28.2% | +27.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BDX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BDX | 43 vs 48 |
| Fundamentals | BDXon balance | revenue growth 9.6% vs 5.7%; EPS growth 9% vs 223.4%; TTM ROE -16.6% vs 3.8%; gross margin 30.1% vs 46.1%; operating margin -2.4% vs 9.8% — BDX takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | BAX | Value 69 vs 63 |
| Technicals | BAX | Price vs 50-day -4.3% vs 3.7%; vs 200-day 18.3% vs 2.9% |
| Risk Resilience | BAX | Risk Resilience 54 vs 46 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 4.3% vs 4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BAX and BDX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BDX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10BDX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BDX +5
- 43 vs 48
- 7 sessions ago
- BDX +5
- 50 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- BDX +11
- 48 vs 59
- 90 sessions ago
- BDX +4
- 52 vs 56
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Jun 25 when BDX moved ahead of BAX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (21.67%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
3 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.04%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
BDX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.57%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.81%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BAX closes the Quality gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to BDX's edge.
- 2BAX's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3BDX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate BDX's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BDX leads on balance| Metric | BAX | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.6% | 5.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 9% | 223.4% |
| Gross margin | 30.1% | 46.1% |
| Operating margin | -2.4% | 9.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -16.6% | 3.8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.56 | 0.69 |
Performance
BAX leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BAX | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.9% | -5.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -10.3% | -3.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 19.1% | 19.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 34% | 8.1% |
| Year to date | 26.5% | -9.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 0.4% | -7.9% |
Technicals
BAX has the stronger structure| Metric | BAX | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 24.1 | 28.5 |
| ADX (14) | 24.2 | 39.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.3% | 3.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 18.3% | 2.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 24.4% | 23.1% |
Risk
BAX is the more resilient| Metric | BAX | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.18 | 0.39 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.11 | -0.22 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.14 | -0.27 |
| Max drawdown | -35.5% | -33% |
| Current drawdown | -14.7% | -16% |
| Annualized volatility | 43.5% | 30.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | -2.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BAX or BDX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BDX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 48 against BAX's 43. The edge comes from quality and momentum. BAX is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BAX or BDX the better buy right now?
BDX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BDX over BAX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BDX leads Quality by 24 points; BAX leads Risk Resilience by 8 points; BAX leads Value by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BAX or BDX?
Analyst price targets imply +4.3% upside for BAX and +4% for BDX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BAX or BDX?
BAX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BAX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BAX or BDX?
BDX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BAX or BDX?
BDX on the Momentum factor, by 6 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BAX or BDX?
BAX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BAX on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BAX more profitable than BDX?
BDX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 30.1% vs 46.1%; operating margin -2.4% vs 9.8%; ttm roe -16.6% vs 3.8%.
Is BDX's lead over BAX getting stronger or weaker?
BDX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-25, when BDX moved ahead of BAX.
What would change the BAX vs BDX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BAX closes the Quality gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to BDX's edge; BAX's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; BDX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate BDX's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about BAX and BDX?
BAX: 3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. BDX: 3 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BAX is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On BDX it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BAX and BDX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.