BBD vs BSBR Stock Comparison
Compare BBD and BSBR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BBD and BSBR?
BSBR leads the current stock comparison as Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Banco Bradesco S.A. vs Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A.
BSBR leads
BSBR leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 17 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support BSBR, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Banco Bradesco S.A.
Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BSBR over BBD, 58 versus 52 as of Sep 11, 2026. BSBR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. BSBR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BSBR today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. BSBR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Banco Bradesco S.A. and Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BBD and BSBR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality26 vs 41BSBR +15
- Risk Resilience34 vs 47BSBR +13
- Momentum72 vs 69Even
- Value70 vs 72Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor BSBR. BSBR’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -1
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
BSBR's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BBD and BSBR both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BSBRBSBR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BBDBBD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
BSBRBSBR on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
BSBRBSBR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BBD | BSBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -11.1% | -0.3% | BSBR has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BSBR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BSBR | 52 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | BSBRon balance | revenue growth -1.5% vs 1.4%; EPS growth 30.6% vs -9.3%; TTM ROE 13.6% vs 11.8%; gross margin 27.4% vs 37.6%; operating margin 7.6% vs 19.5% — BSBR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 70 vs 72 |
| Technicals | BSBR | Price vs 50-day 5.3% vs 8.1%; vs 200-day -0.8% vs -0.7% |
| Risk Resilience | BSBR | Risk Resilience 34 vs 47 |
| Analyst expectations | BSBR | Target upside -11.1% vs -0.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BBD and BSBR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BSBR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10BSBR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BSBR +6
- 52 vs 58
- 7 sessions ago
- BSBR +7
- 52 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- BSBR +17
- 41 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- BSBR +5
- 44 vs 49
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jul 10 when BBD moved ahead of BSBR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (5.59%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (6.32%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
BSBR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.56%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.38%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BBD closes the Quality gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to BSBR's edge.
- 2BBD's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3BSBR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 11 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate BSBR's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BSBR leads on balance| Metric | BBD | BSBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.5% | 1.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 30.6% | -9.3% |
| Gross margin | 27.4% | 37.6% |
| Operating margin | 7.6% | 19.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 13.6% | 11.8% |
| Debt to equity | 4.44 | 1.17 |
Performance
BBD leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BBD | BSBR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.8% | -0.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 11.9% | 2.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 8.5% | 11.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -6.8% | -4.7% |
| Year to date | 7.5% | -3.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 13.7% | 9.5% |
Technicals
BSBR has the stronger structure| Metric | BBD | BSBR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 83.3 | 66.7 |
| ADX (14) | 24.1 | 21 |
| Price vs 50-day | 5.3% | 8.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.8% | -0.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 34.9% | 21.8% |
Risk
BSBR is the more resilient| Metric | BBD | BSBR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.14 | 1.23 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.45 | 0.34 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.68 | 0.54 |
| Max drawdown | -29.2% | -30% |
| Current drawdown | -15% | -18.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 34.4% | 34.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | -3.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BBD or BSBR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BSBR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 58 against BBD's 52. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BBD or BSBR the better buy right now?
BSBR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BSBR over BBD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BSBR leads Quality by 15 points; BSBR leads Risk Resilience by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BBD or BSBR?
Analyst price targets imply -11.1% upside for BBD and -0.3% for BSBR, so the Street currently favors BSBR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BBD or BSBR?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BBD or BSBR?
BBD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BBD or BSBR?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BBD or BSBR?
BSBR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BSBR on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BBD more profitable than BSBR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 27.4% vs 37.6%; operating margin 7.6% vs 19.5%; ttm roe 13.6% vs 11.8%. BBD leads on one measure and BSBR on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is BSBR's lead over BBD getting stronger or weaker?
BSBR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-07-10, when BBD moved ahead of BSBR.
What would change the BBD vs BSBR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BBD closes the Quality gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to BSBR's edge; BBD's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; BSBR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 11 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate BSBR's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about BBD and BSBR?
BBD: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. BSBR: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BBD is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On BSBR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BBD and BSBR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.