BBWI vs BBY Stock Comparison
Compare BBWI and BBY across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BBWI and BBY?
BBY leads the current stock comparison as Best Buy Co., Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Bath & Body Works, Inc. vs Best Buy Co., Inc.
BBY leads
BBY leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors BBWI on target upside.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support BBY, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
Best Buy Co., Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BBY over BBWI, 61 versus 48 as of Sep 11, 2026. BBY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while BBWI holds the stronger value profile. BBY also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BBWI. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BBY today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. BBY lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Bath & Body Works, Inc. and Best Buy Co., Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BBWI and BBY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum30 vs 66BBY +36
- Risk Resilience24 vs 46BBY +22
- Quality50 vs 61BBY +11
- Value72 vs 66BBWI +6
3 of 6 evidence groups favor BBY. BBY’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; BBWI keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No new signals fired.
BBY's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BBWI and BBY both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BBY (Best Buy Co., Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
BBWI (Bath & Body Works, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 62.7% against 41.5%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BBYBBY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BBYBBY on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BBWIBBWI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
BBYBBY on the Momentum factor, by 36 points.
Lower downside
BBYBBY on Risk Resilience, by 22 points.
Analyst upside
BBWIBBWI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BBY, analyst targets favor BBWI. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BBWI | BBY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +18.5% | -6.7% | BBWI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +31.8% | +47.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 13 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BBY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BBY | 48 vs 61 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 9.9% vs 9.4%; EPS growth -36.3% vs 13.7%; TTM ROE -61.8% vs 42.8%; gross margin 44.1% vs 22.7%; operating margin 16.7% vs 4.4% |
| Valuation | BBWI | Value 72 vs 66 |
| Technicals | BBY | Price vs 50-day -6% vs 7.2%; vs 200-day -12.9% vs 22.9% |
| Risk Resilience | BBY | Risk Resilience 24 vs 46 |
| Analyst expectations | BBWI | Target upside 18.5% vs -6.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BBWI and BBY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BBY.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10BBY lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BBY +13
- 48 vs 61
- 7 sessions ago
- BBY +10
- 52 vs 62
- 30 sessions ago
- BBY +12
- 50 vs 62
- 90 sessions ago
- BBY +7
- 55 vs 62
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on May 11 when BBY moved ahead of BBWI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.32%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (18.17%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.8%)
BBWI is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +6.42%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +3.08%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BBWI closes the Momentum gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to BBY's edge.
- 2BBWI's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3BBY's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | BBWI | BBY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.9% | 9.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -36.3% | 13.7% |
| Gross margin | 44.1% | 22.7% |
| Operating margin | 16.7% | 4.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -61.8% | 42.8% |
| Debt to equity | -4.5 | 1.3 |
Performance
BBY leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | BBWI | BBY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.8% | 1.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.8% | 6.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.7% | 16.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -13% | 39.5% |
| Year to date | -13.1% | 31.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -38.7% | 13.5% |
Technicals
BBY has the stronger structure| Metric | BBWI | BBY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.3 | 54.6 |
| ADX (14) | 11.3 | 14.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6% | 7.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -12.9% | 22.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 62.7% | 41.5% |
Risk
BBY is the more resilient| Metric | BBWI | BBY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.38 | 0.71 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.59 | 0.44 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.81 | 0.81 |
| Max drawdown | -47.4% | -33.9% |
| Current drawdown | -38.2% | -2.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 58.6% | 38.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.5% | -3.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BBWI or BBY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BBY is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 61 against BBWI's 48. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. BBWI is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BBWI or BBY the better buy right now?
BBY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BBY over BBWI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BBY leads Momentum by 36 points; BBY leads Risk Resilience by 22 points; BBY leads Quality by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BBWI or BBY?
Analyst price targets imply +18.5% upside for BBWI and -6.7% for BBY, so the Street currently favors BBWI. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BBY. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BBWI or BBY?
BBWI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BBWI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BBWI or BBY?
BBY on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BBWI or BBY?
BBY on the Momentum factor, by 36 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BBWI or BBY?
BBY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BBY on Risk Resilience, by 22 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BBWI more profitable than BBY?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 44.1% vs 22.7%; operating margin 16.7% vs 4.4%; ttm roe -61.8% vs 42.8%. BBWI leads on two measures and BBY on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is BBY's lead over BBWI getting stronger or weaker?
BBY lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-05-11, when BBY moved ahead of BBWI.
What would change the BBWI vs BBY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BBWI closes the Momentum gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to BBY's edge; BBWI's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; BBY's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BBWI and BBY?
BBWI: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. BBY: 5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BBWI is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On BBY it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BBWI and BBY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.