BBWI vs BBY Stock Comparison
BBY currently leads BBWI in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 65 vs 61. The clearest difference is risk resilience, while BBWI has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between BBWI and BBY?
BBY leads the current stock comparison as Best Buy Co., Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Bath & Body Works, Inc. vs Best Buy Co., Inc.
BBY leads
BBY leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, and the lead has widened from 1 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors BBWI on target upside.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support BBY, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
Best Buy Co., Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BBY over BBWI, 65 versus 61 as of Oct 31, 2026. BBY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while BBWI holds the stronger value profile. BBY also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BBWI. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BBY today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. BBY lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Bath & Body Works, Inc. and Best Buy Co., Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BBWI and BBY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience28 vs 49BBY +21
- Quality50 vs 61BBY +11
- Value72 vs 66BBWI +6
- Momentum79 vs 79Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor BBY. BBY’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; BBWI keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
BBY's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BBWI and BBY both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BBY (Best Buy Co., Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
BBWI (Bath & Body Works, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 54.6% against 39.9%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BBYBBY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BBYBBY on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BBWIBBWI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
BBYBBY on Risk Resilience, by 21 points.
Analyst upside
BBWIBBWI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BBY, analyst targets favor BBWI. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BBWI | BBY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -4.5% | -9.7% | BBWI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +32.2% | +46.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 13 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | BBWI | BBY |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 26.96% | 11.55% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.243 | $2.200 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.800 | $3.800 |
| Years increased | 2 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | #68 |
BBWI grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 26.96% a year against BBY's 11.55%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window. They are ranked in different cohorts — variable-dividend payers and US dividend-paying corporations — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BBY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BBY | 61 vs 65 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 9.9% vs 9.4%; EPS growth -36.3% vs 13.7%; TTM ROE -61.8% vs 42.8%; gross margin 44.1% vs 22.7%; operating margin 16.7% vs 4.4% |
| Valuation | BBWI | Value 72 vs 66 |
| Technicals | BBY | Price vs 50-day 23.5% vs 6.3%; vs 200-day 9.3% vs 29.4% |
| Risk Resilience | BBY | Risk Resilience 28 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | BBWI | Target upside -4.5% vs -9.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BBWI and BBY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BBY.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28BBY lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BBY +4
- 61 vs 65
- 7 sessions ago
- BBY +5
- 61 vs 66
- 30 sessions ago
- BBY +1
- 52 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- BBY +15
- 49 vs 64
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only BBWI
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (7.37%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.95%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
5 bullish / 0 bearish
Only BBY
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (20.04%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (2.1%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
BBWI is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.04%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -4.72%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BBWI closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to BBY's edge.
- 2BBWI's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3BBY's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | BBWI | BBY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.9% | 9.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -36.3% | 13.7% |
| Gross margin | 44.1% | 22.7% |
| Operating margin | 16.7% | 4.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -61.8% | 42.8% |
| Debt to equity | -4.5 | 1.3 |
Performance
BBY leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BBWI | BBY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 6% | 3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 30.2% | 9.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 8.5% | 10.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 18.1% | 65.1% |
| Year to date | 7.8% | 44.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -19.9% | 16.5% |
Technicals
BBY has the stronger structure| Metric | BBWI | BBY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 74.4 | 67.6 |
| ADX (14) | 30.8 | 19.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | 23.5% | 6.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 9.3% | 29.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 54.6% | 39.9% |
Risk
BBY is the more resilient| Metric | BBWI | BBY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.4 | 0.45 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.06 | 0.47 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.09 | 0.9 |
| Max drawdown | -43.1% | -33.9% |
| Current drawdown | -17.1% | -2.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 60.6% | 38% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.6% | -3.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BBWI or BBY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BBY is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 65 against BBWI's 61. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. BBWI is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BBWI or BBY the better buy right now?
BBY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BBY over BBWI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BBY leads Risk Resilience by 21 points; BBY leads Quality by 11 points; BBWI leads Value by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BBWI or BBY?
Analyst price targets imply -4.5% upside for BBWI and -9.7% for BBY, so the Street currently favors BBWI. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BBY. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BBWI or BBY?
BBWI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BBWI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BBWI or BBY?
BBY on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BBWI or BBY?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BBWI or BBY?
BBY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BBY on Risk Resilience, by 21 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BBWI more profitable than BBY?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 44.1% vs 22.7%; operating margin 16.7% vs 4.4%; ttm roe -61.8% vs 42.8%. BBWI leads on two measures and BBY on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is BBY's lead over BBWI getting stronger or weaker?
BBY lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the BBWI vs BBY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BBWI closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to BBY's edge; BBWI's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; BBY's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BBWI and BBY?
BBWI: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. BBY: 5 bullish / 0 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BBWI is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On BBY it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BBWI and BBY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.