BBY vs CHWY Stock Comparison
BBY currently leads CHWY in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 64 vs 57. The clearest difference is value, while CHWY has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between BBY and CHWY?
BBY leads the current stock comparison as Best Buy Co., Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Best Buy Co., Inc. vs Chewy, Inc.
BBY leads
BBY leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 17 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors CHWY on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support BBY, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Best Buy Co., Inc.
Chewy, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BBY over CHWY, 64 versus 57 as of Oct 21, 2026. BBY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while CHWY holds the stronger quality profile. BBY also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors CHWY. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BBY today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. BBY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Best Buy Co., Inc. and Chewy, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BBY and CHWY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value66 vs 42BBY +24
- Risk Resilience50 vs 42BBY +8
- Quality61 vs 66CHWY +5
- Momentum74 vs 73Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor BBY. BBY’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; CHWY keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +6
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +13
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
BBY's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BBY and CHWY both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BBY (Best Buy Co., Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
CHWY (Chewy, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 43.4% against 36.9%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BBYBBY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BBYBBY on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BBYBBY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
BBYBBY on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
CHWYCHWY on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BBY, analyst targets favor CHWY. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BBY | CHWY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -8.8% | +50% | CHWY has more room |
| Target dispersion | +46.6% | +75% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 13 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BBY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BBY | 64 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | CHWYon balance | TTM ROE 42.8% vs 44.8%; gross margin 22.7% vs 29.7%; operating margin 4.4% vs 1.7% — CHWY takes 2 of 3 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | BBY | Value 66 vs 42 |
| Technicals | BBY | Price vs 50-day 6.5% vs 0.8%; vs 200-day 26.7% vs -9.2% |
| Risk Resilience | BBY | Risk Resilience 50 vs 42 |
| Analyst expectations | CHWY | Target upside -8.8% vs 50% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BBY and CHWY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BBY.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20BBY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BBY +7
- 64 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- BBY +6
- 63 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- BBY +17
- 61 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- BBY +6
- 59 vs 53
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when BBY moved ahead of CHWY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 0 bearish
Only BBY
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (19.32%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (2.6%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only CHWY
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (12.08%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.86%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
CHWY is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.24%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.93%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1CHWY closes the Value gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to BBY's edge.
- 2CHWY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3BBY's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 10 points over 30 sessions, and a further 7-point move would eliminate BBY's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CHWY leads on balance| Metric | BBY | CHWY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.4% | 0% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 13.7% | 0% |
| Gross margin | 22.7% | 29.7% |
| Operating margin | 4.4% | 1.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 42.8% | 44.8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.3 | 1.14 |
Performance
BBY leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BBY | CHWY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 6.7% | 9.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1% | 9.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 7.8% | 0% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 41% | -22.4% |
| Year to date | 40.3% | -34.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 19.5% | -43.5% |
Technicals
BBY has the stronger structure| Metric | BBY | CHWY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 62.6 | 77.7 |
| ADX (14) | 13.5 | 26.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 6.5% | 0.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 26.7% | -9.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 36.9% | 43.4% |
Risk
BBY is the more resilient| Metric | BBY | CHWY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.53 | 0.78 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.52 | -1.04 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.98 | -1.67 |
| Max drawdown | -33.9% | -53.3% |
| Current drawdown | -1% | -42.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.6% | 46.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | -4.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BBY or CHWY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BBY is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 64 against CHWY's 57. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. CHWY is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BBY or CHWY the better buy right now?
BBY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BBY over CHWY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BBY leads Value by 24 points; BBY leads Risk Resilience by 8 points; CHWY leads Quality by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BBY or CHWY?
Analyst price targets imply -8.8% upside for BBY and +50% for CHWY, so the Street currently favors CHWY. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BBY. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BBY or CHWY?
BBY is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BBY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BBY or CHWY?
BBY on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BBY or CHWY?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BBY or CHWY?
BBY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BBY on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BBY more profitable than CHWY?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 22.7% vs 29.7%; operating margin 4.4% vs 1.7%; ttm roe 42.8% vs 44.8%. BBY leads on one measure and CHWY on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is BBY's lead over CHWY getting stronger or weaker?
BBY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when BBY moved ahead of CHWY.
What would change the BBY vs CHWY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: CHWY closes the Value gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to BBY's edge; CHWY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; BBY's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 10 points over 30 sessions, and a further 7-point move would eliminate BBY's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about BBY and CHWY?
BBY: 5 bullish / 0 bearish. CHWY: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BBY is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On CHWY it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BBY and CHWY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.