BDX vs COO Stock Comparison
Compare BDX and COO across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BDX and COO?
BDX leads the current stock comparison as Becton, Dickinson and Company, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Becton, Dickinson and Company vs The Cooper Companies, Inc.
BDX leads
BDX leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from COO. Wall Street currently favors COO on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support BDX, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Becton, Dickinson and Company
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BDX over COO, 48 versus 46 as of Sep 11, 2026. BDX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while COO holds the stronger quality profile. BDX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors COO. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BDX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. BDX lead: Reversed — COO led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BDX now leads by 2.
Compare Becton, Dickinson and Company and The Cooper Companies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BDX and COO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum37 vs 19BDX +18
- Quality44 vs 57COO +13
- Value63 vs 59BDX +4
- Risk Resilience46 vs 43Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor BDX. BDX’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; COO keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -16
New signals
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.66%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
BDX's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BDX and COO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BDX (Becton, Dickinson and Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
COO (The Cooper Companies, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 56.3% against 23.1%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BDXBDX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BDXBDX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BDXBDX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
BDXBDX on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
BDXBDX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
COOCOO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BDX, analyst targets favor COO. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BDX | COO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +4% | +42.5% | COO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +27.6% | +32.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BDX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 48 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 5.7% vs 5.6%; EPS growth 223.4% vs -160.6%; TTM ROE 3.8% vs 2.8%; gross margin 46.1% vs 64.4%; operating margin 9.8% vs 11.8% |
| Valuation | BDX | Value 63 vs 59 |
| Technicals | BDX | Price vs 50-day 3.7% vs -25.2%; vs 200-day 2.9% vs -20% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 46 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | COO | Target upside 4% vs 42.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BDX and COO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BDX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10BDX lead: Reversed — COO led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BDX now leads by 2.
- Today
- BDX +2
- 48 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- BDX +5
- 55 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- COO +4
- 59 vs 63
- 90 sessions ago
- COO +4
- 56 vs 60
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Aug 25 when BDX moved ahead of COO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.04%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.61%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
BDX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.81%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.48%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1COO closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to BDX's edge.
- 2COO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3BDX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | BDX | COO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 223.4% | -160.6% |
| Gross margin | 46.1% | 64.4% |
| Operating margin | 9.8% | 11.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 3.8% | 2.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.69 | 0.3 |
Performance
BDX leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | BDX | COO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.9% | -10.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.9% | -17.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 19.4% | -20% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 8.1% | -22.9% |
| Year to date | -9.1% | -27.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -7.9% | -15.3% |
Technicals
BDX has the stronger structure| Metric | BDX | COO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 28.5 | 9.4 |
| ADX (14) | 39.6 | 33 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.7% | -25.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 2.9% | -20% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 23.1% | 56.3% |
Risk
Split| Metric | BDX | COO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.39 | 0.58 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.22 | -0.68 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.27 | -0.89 |
| Max drawdown | -33% | -35.8% |
| Current drawdown | -16% | -35.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 30.6% | 32.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.3% | -2.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BDX or COO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BDX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 48 against COO's 46. The edge comes from momentum and value. COO is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BDX or COO the better buy right now?
BDX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BDX over COO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BDX leads Momentum by 18 points; COO leads Quality by 13 points; BDX leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BDX or COO?
Analyst price targets imply +4% upside for BDX and +42.5% for COO, so the Street currently favors COO. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BDX. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BDX or COO?
BDX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BDX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BDX or COO?
BDX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BDX or COO?
BDX on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BDX or COO?
BDX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BDX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BDX more profitable than COO?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 46.1% vs 64.4%; operating margin 9.8% vs 11.8%; ttm roe 3.8% vs 2.8%. BDX leads on one measure and COO on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is BDX's lead over COO getting stronger or weaker?
BDX lead: Reversed — COO led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BDX now leads by 2. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-08-25, when BDX moved ahead of COO.
What would change the BDX vs COO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: COO closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to BDX's edge; COO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; BDX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BDX and COO?
BDX: 3 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. COO: 2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BDX is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On COO it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BDX and COO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.