BEP vs CLNE Stock Comparison
CLNE currently leads BEP in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 42 vs 41. The clearest difference is quality, while BEP has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between BEP and CLNE?
CLNE leads the current stock comparison as Clean Energy Fuels Corp., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. vs Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
CLNE leads
CLNE leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from BEP.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support CLNE, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CLNE over BEP, 42 versus 41 as of Oct 31, 2026. CLNE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while BEP holds the stronger risk resilience profile. CLNE also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CLNE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. CLNE lead: Reversed — BEP led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; CLNE now leads by 1.
Compare Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and Clean Energy Fuels Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BEP and CLNE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience55 vs 37BEP +18
- Quality14 vs 30CLNE +16
- Momentum40 vs 36BEP +4
- Value61 vs 63Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor CLNE. CLNE’s edge is concentrated in quality; BEP keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
CLNE's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BEP and CLNE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CLNE (Clean Energy Fuels Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
BEP (Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, momentum, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CLNECLNE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BEPBEP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
BEPBEP on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
BEPBEP on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
CLNECLNE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BEP | CLNE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +33.1% | +65.3% | CLNE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +31.5% | +35.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CLNE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 41 vs 42 |
| Fundamentals | BEP | revenue growth 9.4% vs -9%; EPS growth 10% vs -23.9%; TTM ROE 2.6% vs -16.7%; gross margin 24.4% vs 19.1%; operating margin 10.6% vs -7.3% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 61 vs 63 |
| Technicals | BEP | Price vs 50-day -4% vs -8.2%; vs 200-day -9.7% vs -29.4% |
| Risk Resilience | BEP | Risk Resilience 55 vs 37 |
| Analyst expectations | CLNE | Target upside 33.1% vs 65.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BEP and CLNE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CLNE.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28CLNE lead: Reversed — BEP led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; CLNE now leads by 1.
- Today
- CLNE +1
- 41 vs 42
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 42 vs 42
- 30 sessions ago
- BEP +1
- 41 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- BEP +1
- 42 vs 41
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 12 when CLNE moved ahead of BEP.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only BEP
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only CLNE
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.65%)
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
CLNE leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.34%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -3.36%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BEP closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to CLNE's edge.
- 2BEP's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3CLNE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BEP leads on balance| Metric | BEP | CLNE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.4% | -9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 10% | -23.9% |
| Gross margin | 24.4% | 19.1% |
| Operating margin | 10.6% | -7.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 2.6% | -16.7% |
| Debt to equity | 8.43 | 0.58 |
Performance
BEP leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | BEP | CLNE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.7% | 5.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.9% | -8.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -11.3% | -25.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -9.7% | -37.6% |
| Year to date | 7.4% | -31.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -1.1% | -52.8% |
Technicals
BEP has the stronger structure| Metric | BEP | CLNE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 47.2 | 43.5 |
| ADX (14) | 14.4 | 18.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4% | -8.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.7% | -29.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 28.4% | 62.6% |
Risk
BEP is the more resilient| Metric | BEP | CLNE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.76 | -0.09 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.3 | -1.16 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.47 | -1.62 |
| Max drawdown | -25.3% | -53.9% |
| Current drawdown | -22.4% | -51.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 27.6% | 53.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.7% | -4.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BEP or CLNE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CLNE is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 42 against BEP's 41. The edge comes from quality. BEP is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BEP or CLNE the better buy right now?
CLNE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CLNE over BEP?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BEP leads Risk Resilience by 18 points; CLNE leads Quality by 16 points; BEP leads Momentum by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BEP or CLNE?
Analyst price targets imply +33.1% upside for BEP and +65.3% for CLNE, so the Street currently favors CLNE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BEP or CLNE?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BEP or CLNE?
BEP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BEP or CLNE?
BEP on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BEP or CLNE?
BEP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BEP on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BEP more profitable than CLNE?
BEP leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 24.4% vs 19.1%; operating margin 10.6% vs -7.3%; ttm roe 2.6% vs -16.7%.
Is CLNE's lead over BEP getting stronger or weaker?
CLNE lead: Reversed — BEP led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; CLNE now leads by 1. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-12, when CLNE moved ahead of BEP.
What would change the BEP vs CLNE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BEP closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to CLNE's edge; BEP's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; CLNE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BEP and CLNE?
BEP: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. CLNE: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BEP is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On CLNE it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BEP and CLNE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.