BIDU vs JD Stock Comparison
JD currently leads BIDU in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 50 vs 46. The clearest difference is momentum, while BIDU has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between BIDU and JD?
JD leads the current stock comparison as JD.com, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Baidu, Inc. vs JD.com, Inc.
JD leads
JD leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, and the lead has widened from 1 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support JD, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Baidu, Inc.
JD.com, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JD over BIDU, 50 versus 46 as of Oct 21, 2026. JD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while BIDU holds the stronger risk resilience profile. JD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JD today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. JD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Baidu, Inc. and JD.com, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BIDU and JD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum26 vs 44JD +18
- Value57 vs 65JD +8
- Risk Resilience65 vs 57BIDU +8
- Quality42 vs 36BIDU +6
5 of 6 evidence groups favor JD. JD’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; BIDU keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
JD's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BIDU and JD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
JD (JD.com, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
BIDU (Baidu, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, quality.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JDJD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
JDJD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JDJD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
JDJD on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
BIDUBIDU on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
JDJD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BIDU | JD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +39.1% | +40.4% | JD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +54.7% | +44.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JD | 46 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | JDon balance | revenue growth -2.6% vs 10.1%; EPS growth -32.5% vs 42.5%; TTM ROE -1.7% vs 6.6%; gross margin 40.8% vs 14.7% — JD takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | JD | Value 57 vs 65 |
| Technicals | JD | Price vs 50-day -13.3% vs -6.8%; vs 200-day -31.3% vs -6.9% |
| Risk Resilience | BIDU | Risk Resilience 65 vs 57 |
| Analyst expectations | JD | Target upside 39.1% vs 40.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BIDU and JD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20JD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- JD +4
- 46 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- JD +6
- 46 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- JD +1
- 46 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- BIDU +6
- 48 vs 42
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 7 when JD moved ahead of BIDU.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 4 bearish
Only BIDU
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only JD
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active.
JD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.09%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -3.62%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BIDU closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to JD's edge.
- 2BIDU's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3JD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JD leads on balance| Metric | BIDU | JD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.6% | 10.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -32.5% | 42.5% |
| Gross margin | 40.8% | 14.7% |
| Operating margin | -6% | 0.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -1.7% | 6.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.42 | 0.48 |
Performance
JD leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | BIDU | JD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.9% | -0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -12.9% | -2.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -25.1% | -11.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -34.8% | -12.3% |
| Year to date | -37.3% | -6.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -33.4% | -18.3% |
Technicals
JD has the stronger structure| Metric | BIDU | JD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 31.8 | 51.9 |
| ADX (14) | 28.5 | 16 |
| Price vs 50-day | -13.3% | -6.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -31.3% | -6.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 24.5% | 21.2% |
Risk
BIDU is the more resilient| Metric | BIDU | JD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.71 | 0.67 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.69 | -0.69 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.09 | -1.24 |
| Max drawdown | -50.9% | -27.1% |
| Current drawdown | -50.5% | -22.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 47.4% | 30% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.7% | -2.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BIDU or JD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 50 against BIDU's 46. The edge comes from momentum and value. BIDU is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BIDU or JD the better buy right now?
JD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JD over BIDU?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JD leads Momentum by 18 points; JD leads Value by 8 points; BIDU leads Risk Resilience by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BIDU or JD?
Analyst price targets imply +39.1% upside for BIDU and +40.4% for JD, so the Street currently favors JD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BIDU or JD?
JD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BIDU or JD?
JD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BIDU or JD?
JD on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BIDU or JD?
BIDU is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BIDU on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BIDU more profitable than JD?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 40.8% vs 14.7%; operating margin -6% vs 0.2%; ttm roe -1.7% vs 6.6%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is JD's lead over BIDU getting stronger or weaker?
JD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-07, when JD moved ahead of BIDU.
What would change the BIDU vs JD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BIDU closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to JD's edge; BIDU's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; JD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BIDU and JD?
BIDU: 0 bullish / 4 bearish. JD: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BIDU is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On JD it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BIDU and JD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.