BKNG vs SE Stock Comparison
Compare BKNG and SE across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BKNG and SE?
SE leads the current stock comparison as Sea Limited, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Booking Holdings Inc. vs Sea Limited
SE leads
SE leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from BKNG.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support SE, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Sea Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SE over BKNG, 40 versus 38 as of Sep 11, 2026. SE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while BKNG holds the stronger value profile. SE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. SE lead: Reversed — BKNG led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SE now leads by 2.
Compare Booking Holdings Inc. and Sea Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BKNG and SE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum11 vs 30SE +19
- Value36 vs 26BKNG +10
- Risk Resilience42 vs 47SE +5
- Quality60 vs 59Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor SE. SE’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; BKNG keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
SE's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BKNG and SE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SE (Sea Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.): the counter-case, on value, fundamentals, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SESE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BKNGBKNG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BKNGBKNG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
SESE on the Momentum factor, by 19 points.
Lower downside
SESE on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
SESE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BKNG | SE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +29.6% | +35.2% | SE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +42.1% | +23.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 19 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 38 vs 40 |
| Fundamentals | BKNGon balance | revenue growth 32.9% vs 9.7%; EPS growth 85.4% vs 2.9%; TTM ROE -96.7% vs 13.5%; gross margin 100% vs 44.3%; operating margin 34.5% vs 8% — BKNG takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | BKNG | Value 36 vs 26 |
| Technicals | SE | Price vs 50-day -10.3% vs -5%; vs 200-day -66% vs 2.2% |
| Risk Resilience | SE | Risk Resilience 42 vs 47 |
| Analyst expectations | SE | Target upside 29.6% vs 35.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BKNG and SE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SE lead: Reversed — BKNG led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SE now leads by 2.
- Today
- SE +2
- 38 vs 40
- 7 sessions ago
- SE +1
- 43 vs 44
- 30 sessions ago
- BKNG +4
- 54 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 51 vs 51
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Sep 4 when SE moved ahead of BKNG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (164.25%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.18%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.90%)
SE leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.24%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.35%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BKNG closes the Momentum gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to SE's edge.
- 2BKNG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BKNG leads on balance| Metric | BKNG | SE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 32.9% | 9.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 85.4% | 2.9% |
| Gross margin | 100% | 44.3% |
| Operating margin | 34.5% | 8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -96.7% | 13.5% |
| Debt to equity | -1.92 | 0.32 |
Performance
SE leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | BKNG | SE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -12.7% | -4.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -17.9% | -15.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 8.5% | 30.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 0.8% | 22.6% |
| Year to date | -18.6% | -15.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -21.8% | -43.4% |
Technicals
SE has the stronger structure| Metric | BKNG | SE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 20.2 | 34.4 |
| ADX (14) | 23.1 | 16.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -10.3% | -5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -66% | 2.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 37.7% | 40.2% |
Risk
SE is the more resilient| Metric | BKNG | SE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -22.07 | 1.32 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.95 | -0.97 |
| Sortino ratio | 16.66 | -1.47 |
| Max drawdown | -96.5% | -60.2% |
| Current drawdown | -96.1% | -45.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 2346.8% | 50.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.7% | -4.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BKNG or SE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 40 against BKNG's 38. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. BKNG is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BKNG or SE the better buy right now?
SE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SE over BKNG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SE leads Momentum by 19 points; BKNG leads Value by 10 points; SE leads Risk Resilience by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BKNG or SE?
Analyst price targets imply +29.6% upside for BKNG and +35.2% for SE, so the Street currently favors SE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BKNG or SE?
BKNG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BKNG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BKNG or SE?
BKNG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BKNG or SE?
SE on the Momentum factor, by 19 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BKNG or SE?
SE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SE on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BKNG more profitable than SE?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 100% vs 44.3%; operating margin 34.5% vs 8%; ttm roe -96.7% vs 13.5%. BKNG leads on two measures and SE on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SE's lead over BKNG getting stronger or weaker?
SE lead: Reversed — BKNG led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SE now leads by 2. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-04, when SE moved ahead of BKNG.
What would change the BKNG vs SE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BKNG closes the Momentum gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to SE's edge; BKNG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BKNG and SE?
BKNG: 2 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SE: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BKNG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SE it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BKNG and SE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.