BKNG vs SE Stock Comparison
BKNG currently leads SE in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 42 vs 37. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between BKNG and SE?
BKNG leads the current stock comparison as Booking Holdings Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Booking Holdings Inc. vs Sea Limited
BKNG leads
BKNG leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 2 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors SE on target upside.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support BKNG, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Booking Holdings Inc.
Sea Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BKNG over SE, 42 versus 37 as of Oct 31, 2026. BKNG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum. BKNG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors SE. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BKNG today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. BKNG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Booking Holdings Inc. and Sea Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BKNG and SE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value35 vs 26BKNG +9
- Momentum27 vs 20BKNG +7
- Risk Resilience48 vs 43BKNG +5
- Quality60 vs 59Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor BKNG. BKNG’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -9
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
BKNG's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BKNG and SE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
SE (Sea Limited): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 44.2% against 28.3%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BKNGBKNG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BKNGBKNG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BKNGBKNG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points.
Momentum
BKNGBKNG on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
BKNGBKNG on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
SESE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BKNG, analyst targets favor SE. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BKNG | SE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +54.7% | +96.3% | SE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +35.8% | +23.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 20 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BKNG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BKNG | 42 vs 37 |
| Fundamentals | BKNGon balance | revenue growth 32.9% vs 9.7%; EPS growth 85.4% vs 2.9%; TTM ROE -96.7% vs 13.5%; gross margin 100% vs 44.3%; operating margin 34.5% vs 8% — BKNG takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | BKNG | Value 35 vs 26 |
| Technicals | BKNG | Price vs 50-day -14.7% vs -26.3%; vs 200-day -16.6% vs -24.1% |
| Risk Resilience | BKNG | Risk Resilience 48 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | SE | Target upside 54.7% vs 96.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BKNG and SE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BKNG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28BKNG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BKNG +5
- 42 vs 37
- 7 sessions ago
- BKNG +9
- 46 vs 37
- 30 sessions ago
- BKNG +2
- 42 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- BKNG +2
- 51 vs 49
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Sep 15 when BKNG moved ahead of SE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only BKNG
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.12%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only SE
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.67%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, MACD Bearish Crossover.
BKNG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.53%, AIQ -3 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.02%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SE closes the Value gap — currently 9 points behind, the largest single contributor to BKNG's edge.
- 2SE's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3BKNG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BKNG leads on balance| Metric | BKNG | SE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 32.9% | 9.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 85.4% | 2.9% |
| Gross margin | 100% | 44.3% |
| Operating margin | 34.5% | 8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -96.7% | 13.5% |
| Debt to equity | -1.92 | 0.32 |
Performance
BKNG leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BKNG | SE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -6.6% | -3.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -9.2% | -22.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -23.4% | -29.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -15% | -9.7% |
| Year to date | -28% | -41% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -28.1% | -51.4% |
Technicals
BKNG has the stronger structure| Metric | BKNG | SE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 33.9 | 21 |
| ADX (14) | 21.2 | 39.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -14.7% | -26.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -16.6% | -24.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 28.3% | 44.2% |
Risk
BKNG is the more resilient| Metric | BKNG | SE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.84 | 1.25 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.78 | -1.31 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.2 | -2 |
| Max drawdown | -32.7% | -53.7% |
| Current drawdown | -32.7% | -52.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.7% | 50.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | -4.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BKNG or SE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BKNG is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 42 against SE's 37. The edge comes from value and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BKNG or SE the better buy right now?
BKNG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BKNG over SE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BKNG leads Value by 9 points; BKNG leads Momentum by 7 points; BKNG leads Risk Resilience by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BKNG or SE?
Analyst price targets imply +54.7% upside for BKNG and +96.3% for SE, so the Street currently favors SE. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BKNG. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BKNG or SE?
BKNG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BKNG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BKNG or SE?
BKNG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BKNG or SE?
BKNG on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BKNG or SE?
BKNG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BKNG on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BKNG more profitable than SE?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 100% vs 44.3%; operating margin 34.5% vs 8%; ttm roe -96.7% vs 13.5%. BKNG leads on two measures and SE on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is BKNG's lead over SE getting stronger or weaker?
BKNG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-15, when BKNG moved ahead of SE.
What would change the BKNG vs SE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SE closes the Value gap — currently 9 points behind, the largest single contributor to BKNG's edge; SE's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; BKNG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BKNG and SE?
BKNG: 1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SE: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BKNG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SE it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BKNG and SE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.