BKR vs HAL Stock Comparison
HAL currently leads BKR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 42. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between BKR and HAL?
HAL leads the current stock comparison as Halliburton Company, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Baker Hughes Company vs Halliburton Company
HAL leads
HAL leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, and the lead has widened from 1 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors BKR on target upside.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support HAL, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Baker Hughes Company
Halliburton Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HAL over BKR, 57 versus 42 as of Oct 31, 2026. HAL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value. HAL also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BKR. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HAL today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. HAL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 15 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Baker Hughes Company and Halliburton Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BKR and HAL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum38 vs 73HAL +35
- Value35 vs 55HAL +20
- Risk Resilience59 vs 62Even
- Quality45 vs 44Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor HAL. HAL’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -29
New signals
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.55%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
HAL's lead widened by 8 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BKR and HAL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HAL (Halliburton Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
BKR (Baker Hughes Company): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 41.2% against 29%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HALHAL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HALHAL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HALHAL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
HALHAL on the Momentum factor, by 35 points.
Lower downside
HALHAL carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
BKRBKR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors HAL, analyst targets favor BKR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BKR | HAL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +28.7% | +21.5% | BKR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +36.6% | +41% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | BKR | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 5.02% | 16.64% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.720 | $0.315 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.920 | $0.680 |
| Years increased | 4 | 3 |
| No cut in window | Yes | No (1) |
| Cohort rank | #253 | not ranked |
HAL grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 16.64% a year against BKR's 5.02%. BKR never reduced its regular dividend in the window; HAL did in 1 year. They are ranked in different cohorts — US dividend-paying corporations and variable-dividend payers — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HAL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HAL | 42 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 2.4% vs -0.2%; EPS growth -26.6% vs -21.9%; TTM ROE 16.3% vs 18.4%; gross margin 23.6% vs 15%; operating margin 12.9% vs 12.6% |
| Valuation | HAL | Value 35 vs 55 |
| Technicals | HAL | Price vs 50-day -5.6% vs 5.7%; vs 200-day -9.2% vs -0.1% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 59 vs 62 |
| Analyst expectations | BKR | Target upside 28.7% vs 21.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BKR and HAL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HAL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28HAL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 15 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- HAL +15
- 42 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- HAL +11
- 43 vs 54
- 30 sessions ago
- HAL +1
- 43 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- HAL +5
- 49 vs 54
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Oct 7 when HAL moved ahead of BKR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only BKR
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.55%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only HAL
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Death Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
HAL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 8 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.32%, AIQ -8 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.75%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BKR closes the Momentum gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to HAL's edge.
- 2BKR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3HAL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | BKR | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.4% | -0.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -26.6% | -21.9% |
| Gross margin | 23.6% | 15% |
| Operating margin | 12.9% | 12.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 16.3% | 18.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.82 | 0.74 |
Performance
HAL leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | BKR | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.4% | 5.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.4% | 12.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.7% | 13% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -18.2% | -14.5% |
| Year to date | 20% | 26.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 15.6% | 34.7% |
Technicals
HAL has the stronger structure| Metric | BKR | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.2 | 77.2 |
| ADX (14) | 19 | 16.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.6% | 5.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.2% | -0.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 41.2% | 29% |
Risk
Split| Metric | BKR | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.67 | 0.12 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.45 | 0.95 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.66 | 1.66 |
| Max drawdown | -24.2% | -27.4% |
| Current drawdown | -21.5% | -16.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 34.2% | 32.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.8% | -3.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BKR or HAL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HAL is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 57 against BKR's 42. The edge comes from momentum and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BKR or HAL the better buy right now?
HAL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HAL over BKR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HAL leads Momentum by 35 points; HAL leads Value by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BKR or HAL?
Analyst price targets imply +28.7% upside for BKR and +21.5% for HAL, so the Street currently favors BKR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors HAL. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BKR or HAL?
HAL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HAL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BKR or HAL?
HAL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BKR or HAL?
HAL on the Momentum factor, by 35 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BKR or HAL?
HAL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HAL carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BKR more profitable than HAL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 23.6% vs 15%; operating margin 12.9% vs 12.6%; ttm roe 16.3% vs 18.4%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is HAL's lead over BKR getting stronger or weaker?
HAL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 15 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-07, when HAL moved ahead of BKR.
What would change the BKR vs HAL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BKR closes the Momentum gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to HAL's edge; BKR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; HAL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BKR and HAL?
BKR: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. HAL: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BKR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On HAL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BKR and HAL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.