BMNR vs BTDR Stock Comparison
Compare BMNR and BTDR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BMNR and BTDR?
BMNR leads the current stock comparison as Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. vs Bitdeer Technologies Group
BMNR leads
BMNR leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 22 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors BTDR on target upside.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support BMNR, and its lead is narrowing.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
Bitdeer Technologies Group
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BMNR over BTDR, 53 versus 38 as of Sep 11, 2026. BMNR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while BTDR holds the stronger value profile. BMNR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BTDR. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BMNR today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. BMNR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 22 to 15 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. and Bitdeer Technologies Group across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BMNR and BTDR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality60 vs 4BMNR +56
- Risk Resilience49 vs 17BMNR +32
- Value34 vs 62BTDR +28
- Momentum68 vs 61BMNR +7
3 of 6 evidence groups favor BMNR. BMNR’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; BTDR keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -15
No new signals fired.
BMNR's lead widened by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BMNR and BTDR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BMNR (Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
BTDR (Bitdeer Technologies Group): the counter-case, on value, fundamentals, valuation.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BMNRBMNR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BMNRBMNR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BTDRBTDR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 28 points.
Momentum
BMNRBMNR on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
BMNRBMNR on Risk Resilience, by 32 points.
Analyst upside
BTDRBTDR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BMNR, analyst targets favor BTDR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BMNR | BTDR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +21.1% | +50.5% | BTDR has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +72.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BMNR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BMNR | 53 vs 38 |
| Fundamentals | BTDRon balance | revenue growth 3.2% vs 21.1%; EPS growth 98.2% vs 45.6%; TTM ROE -84.6% vs -54.7%; operating margin -145.1% vs -34.4% — BTDR takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | BTDR | Value 34 vs 62 |
| Technicals | BMNR | Price vs 50-day 31% vs 6%; vs 200-day 8.8% vs -4.1% |
| Risk Resilience | BMNR | Risk Resilience 49 vs 17 |
| Analyst expectations | BTDR | Target upside 21.1% vs 50.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BMNR and BTDR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BMNR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10BMNR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 22 to 15 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BMNR +15
- 53 vs 38
- 7 sessions ago
- BMNR +13
- 55 vs 42
- 30 sessions ago
- BMNR +22
- 53 vs 31
- 90 sessions ago
- BMNR +14
- 43 vs 29
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jun 1 when BTDR moved ahead of BMNR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (16.42%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.40%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (6.53%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (8.90%)
BTDR is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.43%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +3.73%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BTDR closes the Quality gap — currently 56 points behind, the largest single contributor to BMNR's edge.
- 2BTDR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3BMNR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 15-point move would eliminate BMNR's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BTDR leads on balance| Metric | BMNR | BTDR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.2% | 21.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 98.2% | 45.6% |
| Gross margin | 83.5% | 0.5% |
| Operating margin | -145.1% | -34.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -84.6% | -54.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 1.77 |
Performance
BTDR leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BMNR | BTDR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4.9% | 7.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 35.3% | 27.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 54.7% | -28.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 15% | 46.9% |
| Year to date | -10.9% | 2.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -44.7% | -9.2% |
Technicals
BMNR has the stronger structure| Metric | BMNR | BTDR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 58.6 | 56.4 |
| ADX (14) | 43 | 16.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | 31% | 6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 8.8% | -4.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 90.4% | 92.1% |
Risk
BMNR is the more resilient| Metric | BMNR | BTDR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.95 | 4.16 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.24 | 0.34 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.44 | 0.56 |
| Max drawdown | -79% | -71.9% |
| Current drawdown | -61.7% | -55.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 93.3% | 109.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -9.6% | -9.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BMNR or BTDR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BMNR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 53 against BTDR's 38. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. BTDR is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BMNR or BTDR the better buy right now?
BMNR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BMNR over BTDR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BMNR leads Quality by 56 points; BMNR leads Risk Resilience by 32 points; BTDR leads Value by 28 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BMNR or BTDR?
Analyst price targets imply +21.1% upside for BMNR and +50.5% for BTDR, so the Street currently favors BTDR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BMNR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BMNR or BTDR?
BTDR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BTDR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 28 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BMNR or BTDR?
BMNR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BMNR or BTDR?
BMNR on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BMNR or BTDR?
BMNR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BMNR on Risk Resilience, by 32 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BMNR more profitable than BTDR?
BTDR leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 83.5% vs 0.5%; operating margin -145.1% vs -34.4%; ttm roe -84.6% vs -54.7%.
Is BMNR's lead over BTDR getting stronger or weaker?
BMNR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 22 to 15 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-06-01, when BTDR moved ahead of BMNR.
What would change the BMNR vs BTDR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BTDR closes the Quality gap — currently 56 points behind, the largest single contributor to BMNR's edge; BTDR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; BMNR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 15-point move would eliminate BMNR's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about BMNR and BTDR?
BMNR: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. BTDR: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BMNR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On BTDR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BMNR and BTDR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.