BNL vs BRT Stock Comparison
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. vs BRT Apartments Corp.
BNL leads
BNL leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from BRT. Wall Street currently favors BRT on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support BNL, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.
BRT Apartments Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BNL over BRT, 45 versus 43 as of Sep 5, 2026. BNL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while BRT holds the stronger value profile. BNL also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BRT. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BNL today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. BNL lead: Reversed — BRT led by 7 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BNL now leads by 2.
Compare Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. and BRT Apartments Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare BNL and BRT against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%40 vs 13BNL +27
- Risk Resilience15%74 vs 48BNL +26
- Value30%40 vs 61BRT +21
- Momentum25%40 vs 53BRT +13
3 of 6 evidence groups favor BNL. BNL’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; BRT keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No new signals fired.
BNL's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BNL and BRT both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BNL (Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
BRT (BRT Apartments Corp.): the counter-case, on value, momentum, valuation.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BNLBNL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
BNLBNL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BRTBRT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 21 points.
Momentum
BRTBRT on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
BNLBNL on Risk Resilience, by 26 points.
Analyst upside
BRTBRT on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BNL, analyst targets favor BRT. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BNL | BRT | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +12.3% | +46.3% | BRT has more room |
| Target dispersion | +25.7% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BNL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 45 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | BNL | revenue growth 0.7% vs -0.5%; EPS growth -12.5% vs -35.7%; TTM ROE 5% vs -7.5%; gross margin 43.2% vs 28%; operating margin 48.9% vs 12.8% |
| Valuation | BRT | Value 40 vs 61 |
| Technicals | BNL | Price vs 50-day -3.1% vs -2.8%; vs 200-day 6.1% vs 0.7% |
| Risk Resilience | BNL | Risk Resilience 74 vs 48 |
| Analyst expectations | BRT | Target upside 12.3% vs 46.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BNL and BRT and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BNL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3BNL lead: Reversed — BRT led by 7 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BNL now leads by 2.
- Today
- BNL +2
- 45 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- BRT +7
- 46 vs 53
- 30 sessions ago
- BRT +7
- 40 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- BRT +12
- 47 vs 59
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when BNL moved ahead of BRT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.13%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.34%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
BNL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.29%, AIQ -1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.18%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BRT closes the Quality gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to BNL's edge.
- 2BRT generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3BNL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BNL leads on balance| Metric | BNL | BRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.7% | -0.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -12.5% | -35.7% |
| Gross margin | 43.2% | 28% |
| Operating margin | 48.9% | 12.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 5% | -7.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.95 | 3.17 |
Technicals
BNL has the stronger structure| Metric | BNL | BRT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 40.2 | 56 |
| ADX (14) | 17.7 | 11 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3.1% | -2.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 6.1% | 0.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 19.3% | 22.1% |
Risk
BNL is the more resilient| Metric | BNL | BRT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.02 | 0.19 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.5 | -0.33 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.74 | -0.5 |
| Max drawdown | -10.4% | -20.2% |
| Current drawdown | -8.6% | -11.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 18.8% | 22.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.7% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BNL or BRT?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BNL is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 45 against BRT's 43. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. BRT is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BNL or BRT the better buy right now?
BNL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BNL over BRT?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. BNL leads Quality by 27 points; BNL leads Risk Resilience by 26 points; BRT leads Value by 21 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BNL or BRT?
Analyst price targets imply +12.3% upside for BNL and +46.3% for BRT, so the Street currently favors BRT. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BNL. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BNL or BRT?
BRT is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BRT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 21 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BNL or BRT?
BNL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BNL or BRT?
BRT on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BNL or BRT?
BNL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BNL on Risk Resilience, by 26 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BNL more profitable than BRT?
BNL leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 43.2% vs 28%; operating margin 48.9% vs 12.8%; ttm roe 5% vs -7.5%.
Is BNL's lead over BRT getting stronger or weaker?
BNL lead: Reversed — BRT led by 7 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; BNL now leads by 2. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-22 and 2026-09-03. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when BNL moved ahead of BRT.
What would change the BNL vs BRT verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BRT closes the Quality gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to BNL's edge; BRT generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; BNL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BNL and BRT?
BNL: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. BRT: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BNL is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On BRT it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BNL and BRT with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.