BNTX vs HLN Stock Comparison
Compare BNTX and HLN across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BNTX and HLN?
HLN leads the current stock comparison as Haleon plc, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
BioNTech SE vs Haleon plc
HLN leads
HLN leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors BNTX on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support HLN.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HLN over BNTX, 49 versus 42 as of Sep 11, 2026. HLN's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while BNTX holds the stronger risk resilience profile. HLN also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BNTX. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HLN today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree.
Compare BioNTech SE and Haleon plc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BNTX and HLN against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value35 vs 56HLN +21
- Risk Resilience58 vs 49BNTX +9
- Momentum20 vs 25HLN +5
- Quality60 vs 62Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor HLN. HLN’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; BNTX keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
The central trade-off
HLN (Haleon plc): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
BNTX (BioNTech SE): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 89.9% against 21.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HLNHLN on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HLNHLN on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HLNHLN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 21 points.
Momentum
HLNHLN on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
BNTXBNTX on Risk Resilience, by 9 points.
Analyst upside
BNTXBNTX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors HLN, analyst targets favor BNTX. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BNTX | HLN | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +34.7% | +11% | BNTX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +47.6% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HLN. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HLN | 42 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | HLNon balance | TTM ROE -9.2% vs 9.9%; gross margin 68.9% vs 65.6%; operating margin -64.6% vs 21.4% — HLN takes 2 of 3 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HLN | Value 35 vs 56 |
| Technicals | BNTX | Price vs 50-day -0.1% vs -6.8%; vs 200-day -1.3% vs -6.3% |
| Risk Resilience | BNTX | Risk Resilience 58 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | BNTX | Target upside 34.7% vs 11% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BNTX and HLN and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HLN.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BNTX closes the Value gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to HLN's edge.
- 2BNTX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3HLN starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HLN leads on balance| Metric | BNTX | HLN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -12% | 0% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -51.4% | 0% |
| Gross margin | 68.9% | 65.6% |
| Operating margin | -64.6% | 21.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -9.2% | 9.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.02 | 0.5 |
Performance
BNTX leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BNTX | HLN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -7.1% | -7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.9% | -5.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 11.9% | 1.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 6.1% | -7.8% |
| Year to date | 1.3% | -8.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -6.1% | -5.3% |
Technicals
BNTX has the stronger structure| Metric | BNTX | HLN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 29 | 28.2 |
| ADX (14) | 20.9 | 20.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.1% | -6.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1.3% | -6.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 89.9% | 21.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BNTX or HLN?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HLN is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 49 against BNTX's 42. The edge comes from value and momentum. BNTX is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BNTX or HLN the better buy right now?
HLN carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HLN over BNTX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HLN leads Value by 21 points; BNTX leads Risk Resilience by 9 points; HLN leads Momentum by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BNTX or HLN?
Analyst price targets imply +34.7% upside for BNTX and +11% for HLN, so the Street currently favors BNTX. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors HLN. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BNTX or HLN?
HLN is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HLN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 21 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BNTX or HLN?
HLN on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BNTX or HLN?
HLN on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BNTX or HLN?
BNTX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BNTX on Risk Resilience, by 9 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BNTX more profitable than HLN?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 68.9% vs 65.6%; operating margin -64.6% vs 21.4%; ttm roe -9.2% vs 9.9%. BNTX leads on one measure and HLN on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
What would change the BNTX vs HLN verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BNTX closes the Value gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to HLN's edge; BNTX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; HLN starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Compare BNTX and HLN with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.