BR vs CBRE Stock Comparison
Compare BR and CBRE across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BR and CBRE?
BR leads the current stock comparison as Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. vs CBRE Group, Inc.
BR leads
BR leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors CBRE on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support BR.
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
CBRE Group, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BR over CBRE, 57 versus 42 as of Sep 11, 2026. BR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum. BR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors CBRE. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BR today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. BR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 15 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and CBRE Group, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BR and CBRE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality66 vs 34BR +32
- Momentum32 vs 20BR +12
- Risk Resilience57 vs 49BR +8
- Value68 vs 65Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor BR. BR’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
BR's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BR and CBRE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BR (Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
CBRE (CBRE Group, Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 39.6% against 27.3%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BRBR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BRBR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
BRBR on the Momentum factor, by 12 points.
Lower downside
BRBR on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
CBRECBRE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors BR, analyst targets favor CBRE. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BR | CBRE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +15.9% | +26% | CBRE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +31.4% | +7.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BR | 57 vs 42 |
| Fundamentals | BR | revenue growth 13.7% vs 6.6%; EPS growth 45.4% vs -36.1%; TTM ROE 40.2% vs 15.2%; gross margin 31.8% vs 17.7%; operating margin 17.4% vs 3.6% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 68 vs 65 |
| Technicals | BR | Price vs 50-day 3% vs -3.1%; vs 200-day -4.6% vs -6.1% |
| Risk Resilience | BR | Risk Resilience 57 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | CBRE | Target upside 15.9% vs 26% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BR and CBRE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10BR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 15 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BR +15
- 57 vs 42
- 7 sessions ago
- BR +11
- 63 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- BR +14
- 66 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- BR +12
- 66 vs 54
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (8.18%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 4 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.37%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
CBRE is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.3%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.83%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1CBRE closes the Quality gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to BR's edge.
- 2CBRE's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3BR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BR leads on balance| Metric | BR | CBRE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 13.7% | 6.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 45.4% | -36.1% |
| Gross margin | 31.8% | 17.7% |
| Operating margin | 17.4% | 3.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 40.2% | 15.2% |
| Debt to equity | 1.24 | 1.26 |
Performance
CBRE leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BR | CBRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.5% | -2.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | -6.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 14.9% | 2.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -8.1% | 4.2% |
| Year to date | -24.6% | -14.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -33.6% | -15.3% |
Technicals
BR has the stronger structure| Metric | BR | CBRE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 33 | 30.3 |
| ADX (14) | 28.5 | 17.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3% | -3.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -4.6% | -6.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 27.3% | 39.6% |
Risk
BR is the more resilient| Metric | BR | CBRE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.11 | 0.83 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.41 | -0.45 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.01 | -0.59 |
| Max drawdown | -46.9% | -27.4% |
| Current drawdown | -34% | -19.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 28.7% | 32.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BR or CBRE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 57 against CBRE's 42. The edge comes from quality and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BR or CBRE the better buy right now?
BR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BR over CBRE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BR leads Quality by 32 points; BR leads Momentum by 12 points; BR leads Risk Resilience by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BR or CBRE?
Analyst price targets imply +15.9% upside for BR and +26% for CBRE, so the Street currently favors CBRE. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors BR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BR or CBRE?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BR or CBRE?
BR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BR or CBRE?
BR on the Momentum factor, by 12 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BR or CBRE?
BR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BR on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BR more profitable than CBRE?
BR leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 31.8% vs 17.7%; operating margin 17.4% vs 3.6%; ttm roe 40.2% vs 15.2%.
Is BR's lead over CBRE getting stronger or weaker?
BR lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 15 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the BR vs CBRE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: CBRE closes the Quality gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to BR's edge; CBRE's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; BR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BR and CBRE?
BR: 0 bullish / 2 bearish. CBRE: 1 bullish / 4 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On CBRE it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BR and CBRE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.