BRT vs DEI Stock Comparison
DEI currently leads BRT in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 46 vs 40. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between BRT and DEI?
DEI leads the current stock comparison as Douglas Emmett, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
BRT Apartments Corp. vs Douglas Emmett, Inc.
DEI leads
DEI leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors BRT on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support DEI, and its current signal state is conflicted.
BRT Apartments Corp.
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DEI over BRT, 46 versus 40 as of Oct 21, 2026. DEI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. DEI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BRT. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DEI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. DEI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare BRT Apartments Corp. and Douglas Emmett, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BRT and DEI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality13 vs 28DEI +15
- Risk Resilience47 vs 54DEI +7
- Value61 vs 64Even
- Momentum42 vs 42Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor DEI. DEI’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
DEI's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BRT and DEI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DEI (Douglas Emmett, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
BRT (BRT Apartments Corp.): the counter-case, on technicals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DEIDEI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DEIDEI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
DEIDEI on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
BRTBRT on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors DEI, analyst targets favor BRT. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BRT | DEI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +63.4% | +36.4% | BRT has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +15.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | BRT | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 2.59% | -7.46% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.880 | $1.120 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.000 | $0.760 |
| Years increased | 3 | 0 |
| No cut in window | Yes | No (2) |
| Cohort rank | #22 | not ranked |
BRT grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 2.59% a year against DEI's -7.46%. BRT never reduced its regular dividend in the window; DEI did in 2 years.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DEI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DEI | 40 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | DEI | revenue growth -0.5% vs 2.2%; EPS growth -35.7% vs -7.4%; TTM ROE -7.5% vs -1.2%; gross margin 28% vs 63.2%; operating margin 12.8% vs 19% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 61 vs 64 |
| Technicals | BRT | Price vs 50-day -8.1% vs -10.5%; vs 200-day -7.4% vs -12.3% |
| Risk Resilience | DEI | Risk Resilience 47 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | BRT | Target upside 63.4% vs 36.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BRT and DEI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DEI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20DEI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DEI +6
- 40 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- DEI +6
- 39 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- DEI +7
- 36 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- BRT +3
- 49 vs 46
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when DEI moved ahead of BRT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
Only BRT
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.9%)
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
DEI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -3.82%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.52%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BRT closes the Quality gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to DEI's edge.
- 2BRT's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3DEI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DEI leads on balance| Metric | BRT | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.5% | 2.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -35.7% | -7.4% |
| Gross margin | 28% | 63.2% |
| Operating margin | 12.8% | 19% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -7.5% | -1.2% |
| Debt to equity | 3.17 | 3.12 |
Performance
BRT leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | BRT | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.1% | -2.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.4% | -7.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -10.6% | -20.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -6% | -10.4% |
| Year to date | -9.1% | -12.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -10% | -29.1% |
Technicals
BRT has the stronger structure| Metric | BRT | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 50 | 50 |
| ADX (14) | 19 | 37.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8.1% | -10.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -7.4% | -12.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 25.7% | 35.7% |
Risk
DEI is the more resilient| Metric | BRT | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.17 | 0.64 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.56 | -1.09 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.86 | -1.76 |
| Max drawdown | -16.3% | -32.3% |
| Current drawdown | -14.5% | -29.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 22.3% | 30.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.3% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BRT or DEI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DEI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 46 against BRT's 40. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BRT or DEI the better buy right now?
DEI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DEI over BRT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DEI leads Quality by 15 points; DEI leads Risk Resilience by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BRT or DEI?
Analyst price targets imply +63.4% upside for BRT and +36.4% for DEI, so the Street currently favors BRT. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors DEI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BRT or DEI?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BRT or DEI?
DEI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BRT or DEI?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BRT or DEI?
DEI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DEI on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BRT more profitable than DEI?
DEI leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 28% vs 63.2%; operating margin 12.8% vs 19%; ttm roe -7.5% vs -1.2%.
Is DEI's lead over BRT getting stronger or weaker?
DEI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when DEI moved ahead of BRT.
What would change the BRT vs DEI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BRT closes the Quality gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to DEI's edge; BRT's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; DEI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BRT and DEI?
BRT: 1 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. DEI: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BRT is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On DEI it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BRT and DEI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.