BTG vs WPM Stock Comparison
Compare BTG and WPM across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BTG and WPM?
BTG leads the current stock comparison as B2Gold Corp., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
B2Gold Corp. vs Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
BTG leads
BTG leads by 11 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support BTG, and its current signal state is conflicted.
B2Gold Corp.
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BTG over WPM, 64 versus 53 as of Sep 11, 2026. BTG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while WPM holds the stronger quality profile. BTG also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BTG today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. BTG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 11 points over 30 sessions.
Compare B2Gold Corp. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BTG and WPM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value68 vs 29BTG +39
- Quality72 vs 80WPM +8
- Risk Resilience47 vs 41BTG +6
- Momentum61 vs 58Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor BTG. BTG’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; WPM keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
No new signals fired.
BTG's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BTG and WPM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BTG (B2Gold Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 59.7% against 52.9%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BTGBTG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BTGBTG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BTGBTG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 39 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
BTGBTG on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
BTGBTG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BTG | WPM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.7% | +6.4% | BTG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +40.5% | +18.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BTG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BTG | 64 vs 53 |
| Fundamentals | WPMon balance | revenue growth -32.7% vs 4.5%; EPS growth 106.7% vs -4.8%; TTM ROE 21.9% vs 23%; gross margin 49.2% vs 77.3%; operating margin 46% vs 72.8% — WPM takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | BTG | Value 68 vs 29 |
| Technicals | WPM | Price vs 50-day 17.1% vs 19.8%; vs 200-day 13.7% vs 16% |
| Risk Resilience | BTG | Risk Resilience 47 vs 41 |
| Analyst expectations | BTG | Target upside 14.7% vs 6.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BTG and WPM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 11 points.
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BTG.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10BTG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 11 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BTG +11
- 64 vs 53
- 7 sessions ago
- BTG +10
- 66 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- BTG +9
- 69 vs 60
- 90 sessions ago
- BTG +11
- 56 vs 45
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.63%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.20%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.88%)
BTG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.37%, AIQ -2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.08%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1WPM closes the Value gap — currently 39 points behind, the largest single contributor to BTG's edge.
- 2WPM's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3BTG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
WPM leads on balance| Metric | BTG | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -32.7% | 4.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 106.7% | -4.8% |
| Gross margin | 49.2% | 77.3% |
| Operating margin | 46% | 72.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 21.9% | 23% |
| Debt to equity | 0.11 | 0.2 |
Performance
WPM leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | BTG | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.9% | 0% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.9% | 11.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 38.1% | 40.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.1% | 1.6% |
| Year to date | 18.8% | 28.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 24.9% | 42.4% |
Technicals
WPM has the stronger structure| Metric | BTG | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 49.6 | 50.6 |
| ADX (14) | 31 | 34 |
| Price vs 50-day | 17.1% | 19.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 13.7% | 16% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 52.9% | 59.7% |
Risk
BTG is the more resilient| Metric | BTG | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.94 | 1.66 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.98 | 1.24 |
| Max drawdown | -41.2% | -37.6% |
| Current drawdown | -13.7% | -8.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 62% | 50.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.8% | -5.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BTG or WPM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BTG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 64 against WPM's 53. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. WPM is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BTG or WPM the better buy right now?
BTG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BTG over WPM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BTG leads Value by 39 points; WPM leads Quality by 8 points; BTG leads Risk Resilience by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BTG or WPM?
Analyst price targets imply +14.7% upside for BTG and +6.4% for WPM, so the Street currently favors BTG. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BTG or WPM?
BTG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BTG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 39 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BTG or WPM?
BTG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BTG or WPM?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BTG or WPM?
BTG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BTG on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BTG more profitable than WPM?
WPM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 49.2% vs 77.3%; operating margin 46% vs 72.8%; ttm roe 21.9% vs 23%.
Is BTG's lead over WPM getting stronger or weaker?
BTG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 11 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the BTG vs WPM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: WPM closes the Value gap — currently 39 points behind, the largest single contributor to BTG's edge; WPM's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; BTG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BTG and WPM?
BTG: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. WPM: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BTG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On WPM it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BTG and WPM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.