BTU vs CEIX Stock Comparison
Compare BTU and CEIX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BTU and CEIX?
CEIX leads the current stock comparison as CONSOL Energy Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Peabody Energy Corporation vs CONSOL Energy Inc.
CEIX leads
CEIX leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value.
Competitive: 3 of 4 evidence groups support CEIX.
Peabody Energy Corporation
CONSOL Energy Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CEIX over BTU, 55 versus 52 as of Sep 11, 2026. CEIX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value. 3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor CEIX today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. CEIX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Peabody Energy Corporation and CONSOL Energy Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BTU and CEIX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience43 vs 63CEIX +20
- Value62 vs 72CEIX +10
- Quality29 vs 34CEIX +5
3 of 4 evidence groups favor CEIX. CEIX’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
New signals
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
CEIX's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BTU and CEIX both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CEIXCEIX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CEIXCEIX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CEIXCEIX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
CEIXCEIX on Risk Resilience, by 20 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BTU | CEIX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +29.4% | — | Level |
| Target dispersion | 0% | — | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor CEIX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 52 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | CEIX | revenue growth 3.1% vs 5.2%; EPS growth -174.1% vs 5%; TTM ROE -5.3% vs 2.7%; gross margin 2.2% vs 7.3%; operating margin -3.7% vs 1.6% |
| Valuation | CEIX | Value 62 vs 72 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | CEIX | Risk Resilience 43 vs 63 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BTU and CEIX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CEIX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10CEIX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CEIX +3
- 52 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- CEIX +5
- 50 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- CEIX +3
- 52 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- CEIX +15
- 40 vs 55
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (16.43%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.21%)
No active signals
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.82%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BTU closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to CEIX's edge.
- 2BTU's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3CEIX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CEIX leads on balance| Metric | BTU | CEIX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.1% | 5.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -174.1% | 5% |
| Gross margin | 2.2% | 7.3% |
| Operating margin | -3.7% | 1.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -5.3% | 2.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.13 | 0.15 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | BTU | CEIX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.4% | — |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 17.7% | — |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 10.5% | — |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -15.9% | — |
| Year to date | -2.3% | — |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 57.9% | — |
Technicals
Split| Metric | BTU | CEIX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 60.9 | — |
| ADX (14) | 35 | — |
| Price vs 50-day | 13.2% | — |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.1% | — |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 54.9% | — |
Risk
CEIX is the more resilient| Metric | BTU | CEIX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.41 | — |
| Sharpe ratio | 1 | — |
| Sortino ratio | 1.6 | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.3% | — |
| Current drawdown | -26.5% | — |
| Annualized volatility | 58.5% | — |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.7% | — |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BTU or CEIX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CEIX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 55 against BTU's 52. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BTU or CEIX the better buy right now?
CEIX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CEIX over BTU?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CEIX leads Risk Resilience by 20 points; CEIX leads Value by 10 points; CEIX leads Quality by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BTU or CEIX?
Analyst price targets imply +29.4% upside for BTU and not covered for CEIX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BTU or CEIX?
CEIX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CEIX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BTU or CEIX?
CEIX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BTU or CEIX?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BTU or CEIX?
CEIX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CEIX on Risk Resilience, by 20 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BTU more profitable than CEIX?
CEIX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 2.2% vs 7.3%; operating margin -3.7% vs 1.6%; ttm roe -5.3% vs 2.7%.
Is CEIX's lead over BTU getting stronger or weaker?
CEIX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the BTU vs CEIX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BTU closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to CEIX's edge; BTU's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; CEIX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BTU and CEIX?
BTU: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral. CEIX: No active signals. The most decision-relevant rule on BTU is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BTU and CEIX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.