BXP vs DEI Stock Comparison
DEI currently leads BXP in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 46 vs 38. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between BXP and DEI?
DEI leads the current stock comparison as Douglas Emmett, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
BXP, Inc. vs Douglas Emmett, Inc.
DEI leads
DEI leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 5 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support DEI, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
BXP, Inc.
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DEI over BXP, 46 versus 38 as of Oct 21, 2026. DEI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum. DEI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DEI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. DEI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare BXP, Inc. and Douglas Emmett, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BXP and DEI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value46 vs 64DEI +18
- Momentum35 vs 42DEI +7
- Risk Resilience52 vs 54Even
- Quality27 vs 28Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor DEI. DEI’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
DEI's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BXP and DEI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DEI (Douglas Emmett, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
BXP (BXP, Inc.): the counter-case, on technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DEIDEI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DEIDEI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DEIDEI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points.
Momentum
DEIDEI on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
BXPBXP carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
DEIDEI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BXP | DEI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +21.8% | +36.4% | DEI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +37.8% | +15.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | BXP | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | -3.04% | -7.46% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $3.920 | $1.120 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $3.360 | $0.760 |
| Years increased | 0 | 0 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | No (2) |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
BXP grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — -3.04% a year against DEI's -7.46%.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DEI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DEI | 38 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 2.7% vs 2.2%; EPS growth -32.8% vs -7.4%; TTM ROE 5.8% vs -1.2%; gross margin 46.8% vs 63.2%; operating margin 35% vs 19% |
| Valuation | DEI | Value 46 vs 64 |
| Technicals | BXP | Price vs 50-day -8.6% vs -10.5%; vs 200-day -5.1% vs -12.3% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 52 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | DEI | Target upside 21.8% vs 36.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BXP and DEI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DEI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20DEI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DEI +8
- 38 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- DEI +8
- 37 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- DEI +5
- 38 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- DEI +1
- 45 vs 46
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when DEI moved ahead of BXP.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only BXP
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.06%)
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only DEI
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.63%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
DEI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.73%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.52%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BXP closes the Value gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to DEI's edge.
- 2BXP's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3DEI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | BXP | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.7% | 2.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -32.8% | -7.4% |
| Gross margin | 46.8% | 63.2% |
| Operating margin | 35% | 19% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 5.8% | -1.2% |
| Debt to equity | 3.17 | 3.12 |
Performance
BXP leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | BXP | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.5% | -2.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -8.1% | -7.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -12.4% | -20.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 1% | -10.4% |
| Year to date | -12.5% | -12.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -16.1% | -29.1% |
Technicals
BXP has the stronger structure| Metric | BXP | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.1 | 50 |
| ADX (14) | 30.5 | 37.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8.6% | -10.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -5.1% | -12.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 27.5% | 35.7% |
Risk
Split| Metric | BXP | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.7 | 0.64 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.68 | -1.09 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.99 | -1.76 |
| Max drawdown | -31.2% | -32.3% |
| Current drawdown | -20.4% | -29.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 27.6% | 30.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.7% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BXP or DEI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DEI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 46 against BXP's 38. The edge comes from value and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BXP or DEI the better buy right now?
DEI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DEI over BXP?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DEI leads Value by 18 points; DEI leads Momentum by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BXP or DEI?
Analyst price targets imply +21.8% upside for BXP and +36.4% for DEI, so the Street currently favors DEI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BXP or DEI?
DEI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DEI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BXP or DEI?
DEI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BXP or DEI?
DEI on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BXP or DEI?
BXP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BXP carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BXP more profitable than DEI?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 46.8% vs 63.2%; operating margin 35% vs 19%; ttm roe 5.8% vs -1.2%. BXP leads on two measures and DEI on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is DEI's lead over BXP getting stronger or weaker?
DEI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when DEI moved ahead of BXP.
What would change the BXP vs DEI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BXP closes the Value gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to DEI's edge; BXP's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; DEI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BXP and DEI?
BXP: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. DEI: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BXP is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On DEI it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare BXP and DEI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.