BYD vs TAL Stock Comparison
Compare BYD and TAL across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between BYD and TAL?
TAL leads the current stock comparison as TAL Education Group, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Boyd Gaming Corporation vs TAL Education Group
TAL leads
TAL leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 6 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors BYD on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support TAL, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Boyd Gaming Corporation
TAL Education Group
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TAL over BYD, 62 versus 53 as of Sep 11, 2026. TAL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while BYD holds the stronger risk resilience profile. TAL also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BYD. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TAL today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. TAL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Boyd Gaming Corporation and TAL Education Group across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare BYD and TAL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum24 vs 62TAL +38
- Risk Resilience59 vs 44BYD +15
- Quality67 vs 78TAL +11
- Value60 vs 55BYD +5
2 of 6 evidence groups favor TAL. TAL’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; BYD keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No new signals fired.
TAL's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BYD and TAL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TAL (TAL Education Group): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
BYD (Boyd Gaming Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, value, fundamentals.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TALTAL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TALTAL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BYDBYD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
TALTAL on the Momentum factor, by 38 points.
Lower downside
BYDBYD on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
BYDBYD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors TAL, analyst targets favor BYD. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BYD | TAL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +18.1% | +15.2% | BYD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +23.1% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TAL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TAL | 53 vs 62 |
| Fundamentals | BYDon balance | revenue growth 3.7% vs -6.1%; EPS growth 27.7% vs 64.4%; TTM ROE 70.5% vs 24.6%; gross margin 37.1% vs 56%; operating margin 19.5% vs 12.5% — BYD takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | BYD | Value 60 vs 55 |
| Technicals | TAL | Price vs 50-day -8.2% vs 4.8%; vs 200-day -9.3% vs 4.5% |
| Risk Resilience | BYD | Risk Resilience 59 vs 44 |
| Analyst expectations | BYD | Target upside 18.1% vs 15.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BYD and TAL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TAL.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10TAL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TAL +9
- 53 vs 62
- 7 sessions ago
- TAL +12
- 53 vs 65
- 30 sessions ago
- TAL +6
- 53 vs 59
- 90 sessions ago
- BYD +4
- 63 vs 59
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Jul 28 when BYD moved ahead of TAL.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.45%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.1%)
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.39%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
TAL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.72%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.7%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BYD closes the Momentum gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to TAL's edge.
- 2BYD's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3TAL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BYD leads on balance| Metric | BYD | TAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.7% | -6.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 27.7% | 64.4% |
| Gross margin | 37.1% | 56% |
| Operating margin | 19.5% | 12.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 70.5% | 24.6% |
| Debt to equity | 1.3 | 0.1 |
Performance
TAL leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | BYD | TAL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.3% | -5.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.9% | -3.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -11.9% | 23.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -7.3% | 4.5% |
| Year to date | -10.2% | 5.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -11.5% | 10.8% |
Technicals
TAL has the stronger structure| Metric | BYD | TAL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 28.6 | 50.5 |
| ADX (14) | 34.1 | 21.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8.2% | 4.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.3% | 4.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 18.3% | 39.7% |
Risk
BYD is the more resilient| Metric | BYD | TAL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.55 | 0.77 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.43 | 0.31 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.62 | 0.58 |
| Max drawdown | -17.4% | -30.7% |
| Current drawdown | -16.2% | -10.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 26.5% | 45.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.4% | -3.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BYD or TAL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TAL is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 62 against BYD's 53. The edge comes from momentum and quality. BYD is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BYD or TAL the better buy right now?
TAL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TAL over BYD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TAL leads Momentum by 38 points; BYD leads Risk Resilience by 15 points; TAL leads Quality by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BYD or TAL?
Analyst price targets imply +18.1% upside for BYD and +15.2% for TAL, so the Street currently favors BYD. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors TAL. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BYD or TAL?
BYD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BYD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BYD or TAL?
TAL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BYD or TAL?
TAL on the Momentum factor, by 38 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BYD or TAL?
BYD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BYD on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BYD more profitable than TAL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 37.1% vs 56%; operating margin 19.5% vs 12.5%; ttm roe 70.5% vs 24.6%. BYD leads on two measures and TAL on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is TAL's lead over BYD getting stronger or weaker?
TAL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-28, when BYD moved ahead of TAL.
What would change the BYD vs TAL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BYD closes the Momentum gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to TAL's edge; BYD's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; TAL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BYD and TAL?
BYD: 1 bullish / 4 bearish, conflicted. TAL: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BYD is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On TAL it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BYD and TAL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.