CALM vs CL Stock Comparison
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. vs Colgate-Palmolive Company
CALM leads
CALM leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, and the lead has widened from 5 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support CALM, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
Colgate-Palmolive Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CALM over CL, 48 versus 38 as of Sep 5, 2026. CALM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while CL holds the stronger momentum profile. CALM also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CALM today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. CALM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare CALM and CL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%58 vs 31CALM +27
- Quality30%52 vs 34CALM +18
- Momentum25%25 vs 43CL +18
- Risk Resilience15%59 vs 51CALM +8
4 of 6 evidence groups favor CALM. CALM’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; CL keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (2.9%)
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No new signals fired.
CALM's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CALM and CL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CALM (Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company): the counter-case, on momentum, fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CALMCALM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
CLCL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CALMCALM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points.
Momentum
CLCL on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
CALMCALM on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
CALMCALM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CALM | CL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +34% | +10.3% | CALM has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +30.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CALM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CALM | 48 vs 38 |
| Fundamentals | CLon balance | EPS growth -171% vs 7.4%; TTM ROE 11.8% vs 6.3%; gross margin 23.1% vs 60.4%; operating margin 12% vs 20.7% — CL takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | CALM | Value 58 vs 31 |
| Technicals | CL | Price vs 50-day -11.1% vs -3.3%; vs 200-day -8.4% vs 1.2% |
| Risk Resilience | CALM | Risk Resilience 59 vs 51 |
| Analyst expectations | CALM | Target upside 34% vs 10.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CALM and CL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CALM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4CALM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CALM +10
- 48 vs 38
- 7 sessions ago
- CALM +14
- 51 vs 37
- 30 sessions ago
- CALM +5
- 49 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- CALM +13
- 57 vs 44
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.08%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (4.68%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
CALM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.84%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.47%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1CL closes the Value gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to CALM's edge.
- 2CL's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3CALM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CL leads on balance| Metric | CALM | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -17.1% | 0.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -171% | 7.4% |
| Gross margin | 23.1% | 60.4% |
| Operating margin | 12% | 20.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.8% | 6.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 33.29 |
Performance
CL leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | CALM | CL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -7% | -2.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -12.3% | -4.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1.3% | 0.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -16.9% | -5.1% |
| Year to date | -6.2% | 12.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -32.5% | 5.9% |
Technicals
CL has the stronger structure| Metric | CALM | CL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 32.4 | 44 |
| ADX (14) | 17.6 | 8.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -11.1% | -3.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -8.4% | 1.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 27.9% | 16.7% |
Risk
CALM is the more resilient| Metric | CALM | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.21 | -0.15 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.37 | 0.2 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.07 | 0.37 |
| Max drawdown | -36.4% | -17.5% |
| Current drawdown | -34.4% | -10.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 29.9% | 22.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -2.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CALM or CL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CALM is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 48 against CL's 38. The edge comes from value and quality. CL is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CALM or CL the better buy right now?
CALM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CALM over CL?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. CALM leads Value by 27 points; CALM leads Quality by 18 points; CL leads Momentum by 18 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CALM or CL?
Analyst price targets imply +34% upside for CALM and +10.3% for CL, so the Street currently favors CALM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CALM or CL?
CALM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CALM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CALM or CL?
CL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CALM or CL?
CL on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CALM or CL?
CALM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CALM on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CALM more profitable than CL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 23.1% vs 60.4%; operating margin 12% vs 20.7%; ttm roe 11.8% vs 6.3%. CALM leads on one measure and CL on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is CALM's lead over CL getting stronger or weaker?
CALM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-23 and 2026-09-04. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the CALM vs CL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: CL closes the Value gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to CALM's edge; CL's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; CALM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CALM and CL?
CALM: 2 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. CL: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CALM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On CL it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare CALM and CL with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.