CAT vs CRH Stock Comparison
CRH currently leads CAT in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 51 vs 36. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between CAT and CRH?
CRH leads the current stock comparison as CRH plc, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Caterpillar Inc. vs CRH plc
CRH leads
CRH leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from CAT.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support CRH, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Caterpillar Inc.
CRH plc
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CRH over CAT, 51 versus 36 as of Oct 21, 2026. CRH's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience. CRH also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CRH today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. CRH lead: Reversed — CAT led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; CRH now leads by 15.
Compare Caterpillar Inc. and CRH plc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare CAT and CRH against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum8 vs 51CRH +43
- Risk Resilience42 vs 60CRH +18
- Quality55 vs 58Even
- Value38 vs 41Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor CRH. CRH’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
CRH's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CAT and CRH both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CRH (CRH plc): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
CAT (Caterpillar Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CRHCRH on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CATCAT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
CRHCRH on the Momentum factor, by 43 points.
Lower downside
CRHCRH on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
CRHCRH on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CAT | CRH | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +34.3% | +48.5% | CRH has more room |
| Target dispersion | +47.9% | +47.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | CAT | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 7.23% | 11.24% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $4.120 | $0.869 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $5.840 | $1.480 |
| Years increased | 5 | 4 |
| No cut in window | Yes | No (1) |
| Cohort rank | #179 | not ranked |
CRH grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 11.24% a year against CAT's 7.23%. CAT never reduced its regular dividend in the window; CRH did in 1 year. They are ranked in different cohorts — US dividend-paying corporations and variable-dividend payers — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CRH. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CRH | 36 vs 51 |
| Fundamentals | CATon balance | revenue growth 18% vs 46.2%; EPS growth 41.8% vs 9.2%; TTM ROE 54.1% vs 23.8%; gross margin 33.9% vs 35.8%; operating margin 17.5% vs 13.5% — CAT takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 38 vs 41 |
| Technicals | CAT | Price vs 50-day -8.4% vs -3%; vs 200-day -9.9% vs -19.4% |
| Risk Resilience | CRH | Risk Resilience 42 vs 60 |
| Analyst expectations | CRH | Target upside 34.3% vs 48.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CAT and CRH and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CRH.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20CRH lead: Reversed — CAT led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; CRH now leads by 15.
- Today
- CRH +15
- 36 vs 51
- 7 sessions ago
- CRH +11
- 36 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- CAT +6
- 52 vs 46
- 90 sessions ago
- CAT +6
- 51 vs 45
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Oct 8 when CRH moved ahead of CAT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only CAT
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.13%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.71%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only CRH
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (19.20%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
CRH leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.06%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.95%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1CAT closes the Momentum gap — currently 43 points behind, the largest single contributor to CRH's edge.
- 2CAT's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3CRH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CAT leads on balance| Metric | CAT | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18% | 46.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 41.8% | 9.2% |
| Gross margin | 33.9% | 35.8% |
| Operating margin | 17.5% | 13.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 54.1% | 23.8% |
| Debt to equity | 2.33 | 0.82 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | CAT | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -6.2% | 6.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -10.2% | -3.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -18.4% | -14.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -8.2% | -27.4% |
| Year to date | 26.6% | -31.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 35.1% | -27.1% |
Technicals
CAT has the stronger structure| Metric | CAT | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 28.6 | 58 |
| ADX (14) | 22.1 | 32 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8.4% | -3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.9% | -19.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 32.4% | 28% |
Risk
CRH is the more resilient| Metric | CAT | CRH |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.8 | 1.31 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.9 | -0.96 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.44 | -1.68 |
| Max drawdown | -31.9% | -39.7% |
| Current drawdown | -31.9% | -35.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 40.2% | 32.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4% | -3.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CAT or CRH?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CRH is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 51 against CAT's 36. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CAT or CRH the better buy right now?
CRH carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CRH over CAT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CRH leads Momentum by 43 points; CRH leads Risk Resilience by 18 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CAT or CRH?
Analyst price targets imply +34.3% upside for CAT and +48.5% for CRH, so the Street currently favors CRH. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CAT or CRH?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CAT or CRH?
CAT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CAT or CRH?
CRH on the Momentum factor, by 43 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CAT or CRH?
CRH is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CRH on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CAT more profitable than CRH?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 33.9% vs 35.8%; operating margin 17.5% vs 13.5%; ttm roe 54.1% vs 23.8%. CAT leads on two measures and CRH on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is CRH's lead over CAT getting stronger or weaker?
CRH lead: Reversed — CAT led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; CRH now leads by 15. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-08, when CRH moved ahead of CAT.
What would change the CAT vs CRH verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: CAT closes the Momentum gap — currently 43 points behind, the largest single contributor to CRH's edge; CAT's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; CRH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CAT and CRH?
CAT: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. CRH: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CAT is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On CRH it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare CAT and CRH with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.