CCC vs PSKY Stock Comparison
Compare CCC and PSKY across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between CCC and PSKY?
CCC leads the current stock comparison as CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. vs Paramount Skydance Corporation Class B Common Stock
CCC leads
CCC leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Quality. Wall Street currently favors PSKY on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support CCC, and its current signal state is conflicted.
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.
Paramount Skydance Corporation Class B Common Stock
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CCC over PSKY, 53 versus 46 as of Sep 11, 2026. CCC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while PSKY holds the stronger momentum profile. CCC also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PSKY. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CCC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. CCC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. and Paramount Skydance Corporation Class B Common Stock across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare CCC and PSKY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality51 vs 24CCC +27
- Momentum49 vs 56PSKY +7
- Risk Resilience35 vs 40PSKY +5
- Value66 vs 64Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor CCC. CCC’s edge is concentrated in quality; PSKY keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No new signals fired.
CCC's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CCC and PSKY both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CCC (CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
PSKY (Paramount Skydance Corporation Class B Common Stock): the counter-case, on momentum, risk resilience, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CCCCCC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CCCCCC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
PSKYPSKY on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
PSKYPSKY on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
PSKYPSKY on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors CCC, analyst targets favor PSKY. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | CCC | PSKY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8.9% | +69.8% | PSKY has more room |
| Target dispersion | +13.3% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CCC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CCC | 53 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | CCC | revenue growth 1.7% vs -5.9%; EPS growth 14.5% vs -73.3%; TTM ROE 2.3% vs -5.3%; gross margin 73.5% vs 28.8%; operating margin 15.9% vs -18.4% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 66 vs 64 |
| Technicals | CCC | Price vs 50-day 5.1% vs 10.4%; vs 200-day 10.5% vs -5% |
| Risk Resilience | PSKY | Risk Resilience 35 vs 40 |
| Analyst expectations | PSKY | Target upside 8.9% vs 69.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CCC and PSKY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CCC.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10CCC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CCC +7
- 53 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- CCC +11
- 61 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- CCC +9
- 61 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- CCC +17
- 59 vs 42
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (5.78%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (13.80%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.12%)
CCC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.58%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.12%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PSKY closes the Quality gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to CCC's edge.
- 2PSKY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3CCC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CCC leads on balance| Metric | CCC | PSKY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 1.7% | -5.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 14.5% | -73.3% |
| Gross margin | 73.5% | 28.8% |
| Operating margin | 15.9% | -18.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 2.3% | -5.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0.77 | 1.29 |
Performance
CCC leads 4 of 5 windows| Metric | CCC | PSKY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.6% | -5.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.7% | 9.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 45.7% | 0.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 13.8% | 4.4% |
| Year to date | -13.8% | -22.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | — | -31.7% |
Technicals
CCC has the stronger structure| Metric | CCC | PSKY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 35.6 | 51.8 |
| ADX (14) | 20.2 | 34.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | 5.1% | 10.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | 10.5% | -5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 50% | 38.3% |
Risk
PSKY is the more resilient| Metric | CCC | PSKY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.85 | 0.75 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.26 | -0.53 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.4 | -0.98 |
| Max drawdown | -51.6% | -60.4% |
| Current drawdown | -21.4% | -47.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 59.4% | 53.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.9% | -4.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CCC or PSKY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CCC is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 53 against PSKY's 46. The edge comes from quality. PSKY is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CCC or PSKY the better buy right now?
CCC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CCC over PSKY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CCC leads Quality by 27 points; PSKY leads Momentum by 7 points; PSKY leads Risk Resilience by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CCC or PSKY?
Analyst price targets imply +8.9% upside for CCC and +69.8% for PSKY, so the Street currently favors PSKY. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors CCC. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CCC or PSKY?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CCC or PSKY?
CCC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CCC or PSKY?
PSKY on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CCC or PSKY?
PSKY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PSKY on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CCC more profitable than PSKY?
CCC leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 73.5% vs 28.8%; operating margin 15.9% vs -18.4%; ttm roe 2.3% vs -5.3%.
Is CCC's lead over PSKY getting stronger or weaker?
CCC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the CCC vs PSKY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PSKY closes the Quality gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to CCC's edge; PSKY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; CCC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CCC and PSKY?
CCC: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. PSKY: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CCC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On PSKY it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare CCC and PSKY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.