CCS vs DHI Stock Comparison
DHI currently leads CCS in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 53 vs 45. The clearest difference is momentum, while CCS has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between CCS and DHI?
DHI leads the current stock comparison as D.R. Horton, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Century Communities, Inc. vs D.R. Horton, Inc.
DHI leads
DHI leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 5 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors CCS on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support DHI, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Century Communities, Inc.
D.R. Horton, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DHI over CCS, 53 versus 45 as of Oct 22, 2026. DHI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while CCS holds the stronger value profile. DHI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors CCS. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DHI today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. DHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Century Communities, Inc. and D.R. Horton, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare CCS and DHI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum28 vs 48DHI +20
- Quality33 vs 48DHI +15
- Value66 vs 58CCS +8
- Risk Resilience58 vs 64DHI +6
4 of 6 evidence groups favor DHI. DHI’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; CCS keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +10
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
DHI's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CCS and DHI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DHI (D.R. Horton, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
CCS (Century Communities, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DHIDHI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CCSCCS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CCSCCS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
DHIDHI on the Momentum factor, by 20 points.
Lower downside
DHIDHI on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
CCSCCS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors DHI, analyst targets favor CCS. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | CCS | DHI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +51.1% | +13% | CCS has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +34.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DHI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DHI | 45 vs 53 |
| Fundamentals | DHIon balance | revenue growth 17.4% vs 22.1%; EPS growth 48.8% vs 41.8%; TTM ROE 5.2% vs 12.8%; gross margin 17.1% vs 22.6%; operating margin 4.4% vs 11.6% — DHI takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | CCS | Value 66 vs 58 |
| Technicals | DHI | Price vs 50-day -13.5% vs -1.7%; vs 200-day -11.1% vs -5.2% |
| Risk Resilience | DHI | Risk Resilience 58 vs 64 |
| Analyst expectations | CCS | Target upside 51.1% vs 13% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CCS and DHI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DHI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20DHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DHI +8
- 45 vs 53
- 7 sessions ago
- DHI +8
- 44 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- DHI +5
- 48 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- CCS +2
- 53 vs 51
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Aug 31 when DHI moved ahead of CCS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only CCS
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.52%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.74%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only DHI
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.61%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
DHI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.15%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.85%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1CCS closes the Momentum gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to DHI's edge.
- 2CCS's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3DHI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DHI leads on balance| Metric | CCS | DHI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 17.4% | 22.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 48.8% | 41.8% |
| Gross margin | 17.1% | 22.6% |
| Operating margin | 4.4% | 11.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 5.2% | 12.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.66 | 0.3 |
Performance
DHI leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | CCS | DHI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.1% | 3.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.2% | -2.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -14% | -1.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -13.1% | -13.6% |
| Year to date | -6.5% | -2.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -7.1% | -8.3% |
Technicals
DHI has the stronger structure| Metric | CCS | DHI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 34.5 | 55.3 |
| ADX (14) | 31 | 11.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -13.5% | -1.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -11.1% | -5.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 34.2% | 32.4% |
Risk
DHI is the more resilient| Metric | CCS | DHI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1 | 0.92 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.08 | -0.2 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.15 | -0.39 |
| Max drawdown | -35.3% | -21% |
| Current drawdown | -25.9% | -16.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 41.9% | 35.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.9% | -3.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CCS or DHI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DHI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 53 against CCS's 45. The edge comes from momentum and quality. CCS is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CCS or DHI the better buy right now?
DHI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DHI over CCS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DHI leads Momentum by 20 points; DHI leads Quality by 15 points; CCS leads Value by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CCS or DHI?
Analyst price targets imply +51.1% upside for CCS and +13% for DHI, so the Street currently favors CCS. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors DHI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CCS or DHI?
CCS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CCS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CCS or DHI?
CCS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CCS or DHI?
DHI on the Momentum factor, by 20 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CCS or DHI?
DHI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DHI on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CCS more profitable than DHI?
DHI leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 17.1% vs 22.6%; operating margin 4.4% vs 11.6%; ttm roe 5.2% vs 12.8%.
Is DHI's lead over CCS getting stronger or weaker?
DHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 5 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-31, when DHI moved ahead of CCS.
What would change the CCS vs DHI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: CCS closes the Momentum gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to DHI's edge; CCS's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; DHI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CCS and DHI?
CCS: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. DHI: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CCS is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On DHI it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare CCS and DHI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.