CLOV vs COR Stock Comparison
Compare CLOV and COR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between CLOV and COR?
COR leads the current stock comparison as Cencora, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Clover Health Investments, Corp. vs Cencora, Inc.
COR leads
COR leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 12 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support COR, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Clover Health Investments, Corp.
Cencora, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors COR over CLOV, 54 versus 49 as of Sep 11, 2026. COR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value, while CLOV holds the stronger momentum profile. COR also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor COR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. COR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Clover Health Investments, Corp. and Cencora, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare CLOV and COR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience35 vs 59COR +24
- Momentum78 vs 57CLOV +21
- Value42 vs 62COR +20
- Quality38 vs 42COR +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor COR. COR’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value; CLOV keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +23
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
No new signals fired.
COR's lead narrowed by 7 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CLOV and COR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
COR (Cencora, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and value.
CLOV (Clover Health Investments, Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 47.5% against 20.4%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CORCOR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CLOVCLOV on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CORCOR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
CLOVCLOV on the Momentum factor, by 21 points.
Lower downside
CORCOR on Risk Resilience, by 24 points.
Analyst upside
CORCOR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CLOV | COR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +0.8% | +13.1% | COR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +26.7% | +27.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor COR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | COR | 49 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth -4.6% vs -53.2%; TTM ROE -5.4% vs 106.4%; gross margin 18.6% vs 3.7%; operating margin -0.7% vs 1.3% |
| Valuation | COR | Value 42 vs 62 |
| Technicals | CLOV | Price vs 50-day 8.1% vs 2.3%; vs 200-day 48.5% vs -0.1% |
| Risk Resilience | COR | Risk Resilience 35 vs 59 |
| Analyst expectations | COR | Target upside 0.8% vs 13.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CLOV and COR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on COR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10COR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- COR +5
- 49 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- COR +18
- 41 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- COR +12
- 40 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- COR +14
- 45 vs 59
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on May 27 when COR moved ahead of CLOV.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (40.62%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.19%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
COR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.34%, AIQ +5 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.19%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1CLOV closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to COR's edge.
- 2CLOV's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3COR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate COR's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | CLOV | COR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.8% | 8.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -4.6% | -53.2% |
| Gross margin | 18.6% | 3.7% |
| Operating margin | -0.7% | 1.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -5.4% | 106.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 3.84 |
Performance
CLOV leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | CLOV | COR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 9.5% | -4.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.7% | 2.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.7% | 14.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 128.7% | -8.4% |
| Year to date | 100.4% | -5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 71.9% | 7.8% |
Technicals
CLOV has the stronger structure| Metric | CLOV | COR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 81.1 | 56 |
| ADX (14) | 11.3 | 21.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 8.1% | 2.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 48.5% | -0.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 47.5% | 20.4% |
Risk
COR is the more resilient| Metric | CLOV | COR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.18 | -0.17 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1 | 0.27 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.8 | 0.27 |
| Max drawdown | -55.5% | -32.6% |
| Current drawdown | -12.9% | -14.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 67.3% | 31.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.8% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CLOV or COR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, COR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 54 against CLOV's 49. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. CLOV is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CLOV or COR the better buy right now?
COR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor COR over CLOV?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. COR leads Risk Resilience by 24 points; CLOV leads Momentum by 21 points; COR leads Value by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CLOV or COR?
Analyst price targets imply +0.8% upside for CLOV and +13.1% for COR, so the Street currently favors COR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CLOV or COR?
COR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. COR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CLOV or COR?
CLOV on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CLOV or COR?
CLOV on the Momentum factor, by 21 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CLOV or COR?
COR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. COR on Risk Resilience, by 24 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CLOV more profitable than COR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 18.6% vs 3.7%; operating margin -0.7% vs 1.3%; ttm roe -5.4% vs 106.4%. CLOV leads on one measure and COR on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is COR's lead over CLOV getting stronger or weaker?
COR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-05-27, when COR moved ahead of CLOV.
What would change the CLOV vs COR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: CLOV closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to COR's edge; CLOV's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; COR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate COR's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about CLOV and COR?
CLOV: 4 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. COR: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CLOV is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On COR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare CLOV and COR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.