CMCSA vs FOX Stock Comparison
FOX currently leads CMCSA in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 65 vs 59. The clearest difference is momentum, while CMCSA has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between CMCSA and FOX?
FOX leads the current stock comparison as Fox Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Comcast Corporation vs Fox Corporation
FOX leads
FOX leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 2 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support FOX, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Comcast Corporation
Fox Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FOX over CMCSA, 65 versus 59 as of Oct 21, 2026. FOX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while CMCSA holds the stronger value profile. FOX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FOX today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. FOX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Comcast Corporation and Fox Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare CMCSA and FOX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum50 vs 76FOX +26
- Risk Resilience52 vs 65FOX +13
- Value72 vs 63CMCSA +9
- Quality57 vs 57Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor FOX. FOX’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; CMCSA keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
FOX's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CMCSA and FOX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
FOX (Fox Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
CMCSA (Comcast Corporation): the counter-case, on value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FOXFOX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CMCSACMCSA on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CMCSACMCSA on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points.
Momentum
FOXFOX on the Momentum factor, by 26 points.
Lower downside
FOXFOX on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
FOXFOX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CMCSA | FOX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +28.7% | +44.6% | FOX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +63.3% | +28.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | CMCSA | FOX |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 7.63% | 3.64% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.900 | $0.460 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.300 | $0.550 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #155 | #293 |
CMCSA grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 7.63% a year against FOX's 3.64%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FOX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | FOX | 59 vs 65 |
| Fundamentals | FOXon balance | revenue growth -4.8% vs 5.5%; EPS growth 65% vs 3.2%; TTM ROE 12% vs 14.7%; gross margin 69.4% vs 49.4%; operating margin 14.7% vs 24.5% — FOX takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | CMCSA | Value 72 vs 63 |
| Technicals | FOX | Price vs 50-day -8% vs 0.5%; vs 200-day -15% vs 6.2% |
| Risk Resilience | FOX | Risk Resilience 52 vs 65 |
| Analyst expectations | FOX | Target upside 28.7% vs 44.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CMCSA and FOX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FOX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20FOX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- FOX +6
- 59 vs 65
- 7 sessions ago
- FOX +3
- 56 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- FOX +2
- 52 vs 54
- 90 sessions ago
- FOX +4
- 62 vs 66
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 6 when CMCSA moved ahead of FOX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only CMCSA
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (9.68%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
5 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only FOX
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.71%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, MACD Bullish Crossover.
FOX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.25%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.87%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1CMCSA closes the Momentum gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to FOX's edge.
- 2CMCSA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3FOX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
FOX leads on balance| Metric | CMCSA | FOX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -4.8% | 5.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 65% | 3.2% |
| Gross margin | 69.4% | 49.4% |
| Operating margin | 14.7% | 24.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12% | 14.7% |
| Debt to equity | 1.01 | 0.65 |
Performance
FOX leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | CMCSA | FOX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 7.1% | 6.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.3% | 4.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.9% | 18% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -23% | 3.7% |
| Year to date | -25.2% | -8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -23.6% | 16.5% |
Technicals
FOX has the stronger structure| Metric | CMCSA | FOX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 59 | 65.4 |
| ADX (14) | 40.8 | 16.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8% | 0.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -15% | 6.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 23.5% | 23.7% |
Risk
FOX is the more resilient| Metric | CMCSA | FOX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.07 | 0.02 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.81 | 0.47 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.98 | 0.58 |
| Max drawdown | -36.4% | -34.5% |
| Current drawdown | -31.2% | -11.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 32.8% | 33.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.2% | -2.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CMCSA or FOX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FOX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 65 against CMCSA's 59. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. CMCSA is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CMCSA or FOX the better buy right now?
FOX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FOX over CMCSA?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. FOX leads Momentum by 26 points; FOX leads Risk Resilience by 13 points; CMCSA leads Value by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CMCSA or FOX?
Analyst price targets imply +28.7% upside for CMCSA and +44.6% for FOX, so the Street currently favors FOX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CMCSA or FOX?
CMCSA is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CMCSA on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CMCSA or FOX?
CMCSA on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CMCSA or FOX?
FOX on the Momentum factor, by 26 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CMCSA or FOX?
FOX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. FOX on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CMCSA more profitable than FOX?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 69.4% vs 49.4%; operating margin 14.7% vs 24.5%; ttm roe 12% vs 14.7%. CMCSA leads on one measure and FOX on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is FOX's lead over CMCSA getting stronger or weaker?
FOX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-06, when CMCSA moved ahead of FOX.
What would change the CMCSA vs FOX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: CMCSA closes the Momentum gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to FOX's edge; CMCSA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; FOX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CMCSA and FOX?
CMCSA: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. FOX: 5 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CMCSA is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On FOX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare CMCSA and FOX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.