CNP vs DTE Stock Comparison
Compare CNP and DTE across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between CNP and DTE?
CNP and DTE are close on the current AIQ evidence, so the better fit depends more on objective, risk tolerance and valuation preference than on a single headline score.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. vs DTE Energy Company
CNP and DTE are effectively level
CNP and DTE are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
DTE Energy Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate CNP and DTE as of Sep 11, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and DTE Energy Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare CNP and DTE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value48 vs 57DTE +9
- Quality34 vs 27CNP +7
- Momentum34 vs 31Even
- Risk Resilience52 vs 52Even
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
CNP's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CNP and DTE both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EvenNeither separates on the overall score.
Growth
DTEDTE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DTEDTE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
DTEDTE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CNP | DTE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +18.3% | +18.5% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +21.6% | +18.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 41 vs 41 |
| Fundamentals | CNPon balance | revenue growth -27.7% vs -35.1%; EPS growth -22.9% vs 14.3%; TTM ROE 9.9% vs 10.8%; gross margin 54.1% vs 36.7%; operating margin 23.2% vs 12.3% — CNP takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DTE | Value 48 vs 57 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -6% vs -6.9%; vs 200-day -5.6% vs -4.4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 52 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 18.3% vs 18.5% |
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10DTE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 0 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- Level
- 41 vs 41
- 7 sessions ago
- CNP +2
- 41 vs 39
- 30 sessions ago
- DTE +2
- 39 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- DTE +1
- 50 vs 51
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when CNP moved ahead of DTE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.32%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.68%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.03%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.31%, AIQ 0 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CNP leads on balance| Metric | CNP | DTE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -27.7% | -35.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -22.9% | 14.3% |
| Gross margin | 54.1% | 36.7% |
| Operating margin | 23.2% | 12.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 9.9% | 10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 2.14 | 2.29 |
Performance
DTE leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | CNP | DTE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1% | -1.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.5% | -3.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.5% | -8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -8.9% | -8.3% |
| Year to date | 2% | 4.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 4.8% | -0.3% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | CNP | DTE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 40.5 | 36.4 |
| ADX (14) | 9.4 | 17.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6% | -6.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -5.6% | -4.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 18.4% | 13.6% |
Risk
Split| Metric | CNP | DTE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.13 | -0.02 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.1 | -0.18 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.14 | -0.28 |
| Max drawdown | -13.9% | -13% |
| Current drawdown | -13.1% | -13% |
| Annualized volatility | 17.2% | 17.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.8% | -1.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which has more analyst upside, CNP or DTE?
Analyst price targets imply +18.3% upside for CNP and +18.5% for DTE. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CNP or DTE?
DTE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DTE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CNP or DTE?
DTE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CNP or DTE?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CNP or DTE?
DTE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DTE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CNP more profitable than DTE?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 54.1% vs 36.7%; operating margin 23.2% vs 12.3%; ttm roe 9.9% vs 10.8%. CNP leads on two measures and DTE on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
What do the current signals say about CNP and DTE?
CNP: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. DTE: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on CNP is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On DTE it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare CNP and DTE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.