COMP vs COUR Stock Comparison
Compare COMP and COUR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between COMP and COUR?
COUR leads the current stock comparison as Coursera, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Compass, Inc. vs Coursera, Inc.
COUR leads
COUR leads by 19 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 16 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support COUR, and its lead is widening.
Compass, Inc.
Coursera, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors COUR over COMP, 46 versus 27 as of Sep 11, 2026. COUR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. COUR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor COUR today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. COUR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 19 points over 30 sessions. COUR leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Compass, Inc. and Coursera, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare COMP and COUR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality19 vs 55COUR +36
- Risk Resilience19 vs 48COUR +29
- Value42 vs 50COUR +8
- Momentum25 vs 30COUR +5
4 of 6 evidence groups favor COUR. COUR’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -6
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
COUR's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — COMP and COUR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
COUR (Coursera, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
COMP (Compass, Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
COURCOUR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
COMPCOMP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
COURCOUR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
COURCOUR on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
COURCOUR on Risk Resilience, by 29 points.
Analyst upside
COURCOUR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | COMP | COUR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +32.5% | +45.6% | COUR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +43.1% | +46.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor COUR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | COUR | 27 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | COMPon balance | revenue growth 59.2% vs 52.6%; EPS growth 4.3% vs -216.7%; TTM ROE 3.6% vs -17.7%; gross margin 12.7% vs 55.9% — COMP takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | COUR | Value 42 vs 50 |
| Technicals | COMP | Price vs 50-day -10.7% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -0.2% vs -15.3% |
| Risk Resilience | COUR | Risk Resilience 19 vs 48 |
| Analyst expectations | COUR | Target upside 32.5% vs 45.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of COMP and COUR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 19 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on COUR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10COUR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- COUR +19
- 27 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- COUR +24
- 30 vs 54
- 30 sessions ago
- COUR +16
- 40 vs 56
- 90 sessions ago
- COUR +15
- 41 vs 56
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (15.91%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (6.99%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
COMP is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +3.75%, AIQ -2 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.19%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1COMP closes the Quality gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to COUR's edge.
- 2COMP's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3COUR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
COMP leads on balance| Metric | COMP | COUR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 59.2% | 52.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 4.3% | -216.7% |
| Gross margin | 12.7% | 55.9% |
| Operating margin | -0.7% | -17.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 3.6% | -17.7% |
| Debt to equity | 1.38 | 0.01 |
Performance
COMP leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | COMP | COUR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.3% | -14.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -20.4% | -6.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 28.1% | -2.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 17.4% | -14% |
| Year to date | -4.2% | -28.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 8.6% | -54.9% |
Technicals
COMP has the stronger structure| Metric | COMP | COUR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 26.9 | 36 |
| ADX (14) | 16.5 | 17.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -10.7% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.2% | -15.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 52.4% | 49.1% |
Risk
COUR is the more resilient| Metric | COMP | COUR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.21 | 0.37 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.4 | -1.2 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.66 | -1.59 |
| Max drawdown | -50.8% | -57.8% |
| Current drawdown | -25.4% | -56.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 66.5% | 58% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.1% | -5.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, COMP or COUR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, COUR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 46 against COMP's 27. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is COMP or COUR the better buy right now?
COUR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor COUR over COMP?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. COUR leads Quality by 36 points; COUR leads Risk Resilience by 29 points; COUR leads Value by 8 points. COUR leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by COMP simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, COMP or COUR?
Analyst price targets imply +32.5% upside for COMP and +45.6% for COUR, so the Street currently favors COUR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, COMP or COUR?
COUR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. COUR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, COMP or COUR?
COMP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, COMP or COUR?
COUR on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, COMP or COUR?
COUR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. COUR on Risk Resilience, by 29 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is COMP more profitable than COUR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 12.7% vs 55.9%; operating margin -0.7% vs -17.8%; ttm roe 3.6% vs -17.7%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is COUR's lead over COMP getting stronger or weaker?
COUR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 19 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the COMP vs COUR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: COMP closes the Quality gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to COUR's edge; COMP's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; COUR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about COMP and COUR?
COMP: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. COUR: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on COMP is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On COUR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare COMP and COUR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.