CRH vs DE Stock Comparison
CRH currently leads DE in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 51 vs 34. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between CRH and DE?
CRH leads the current stock comparison as CRH plc, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
CRH plc vs Deere & Company
CRH leads
CRH leads by 17 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support CRH, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CRH over DE, 51 versus 34 as of Oct 22, 2026. CRH's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality. CRH also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CRH today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. CRH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 17 points over 30 sessions.
Compare CRH plc and Deere & Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare CRH and DE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum51 vs 21CRH +30
- Quality58 vs 34CRH +24
- Risk Resilience60 vs 48CRH +12
- Value41 vs 38Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor CRH. CRH’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
CRH's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CRH and DE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CRH (CRH plc): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
DE (Deere & Company): the counter-case, on technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CRHCRH on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CRHCRH on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
CRHCRH on the Momentum factor, by 30 points.
Lower downside
CRHCRH on Risk Resilience, by 12 points.
Analyst upside
CRHCRH on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CRH | DE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +48.5% | +12.6% | CRH has more room |
| Target dispersion | +47.4% | +33.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | CRH | DE |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 11.24% | 16.34% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.869 | $3.040 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.480 | $6.480 |
| Years increased | 4 | 5 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | #26 |
DE grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 16.34% a year against CRH's 11.24%. DE never reduced its regular dividend in the window; CRH did in 1 year. They are ranked in different cohorts — variable-dividend payers and US dividend-paying corporations — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CRH. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CRH | 51 vs 34 |
| Fundamentals | CRHon balance | revenue growth 46.2% vs -5.7%; EPS growth 9.2% vs -22.1%; TTM ROE 23.8% vs 18.1%; gross margin 35.8% vs 35.7%; operating margin 13.5% vs 19% — CRH takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 41 vs 38 |
| Technicals | DE | Price vs 50-day -3% vs -3.1%; vs 200-day -19.4% vs 5.6% |
| Risk Resilience | CRH | Risk Resilience 60 vs 48 |
| Analyst expectations | CRH | Target upside 48.5% vs 12.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CRH and DE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 17 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CRH.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20CRH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 17 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CRH +17
- 51 vs 34
- 7 sessions ago
- CRH +13
- 47 vs 34
- 30 sessions ago
- CRH +3
- 46 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- CRH +7
- 45 vs 38
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Aug 21 when DE moved ahead of CRH.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only CRH
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (19.20%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only DE
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.79%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
CRH leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.95%, AIQ +2 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.69%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DE closes the Momentum gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to CRH's edge.
- 2DE's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3CRH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CRH leads on balance| Metric | CRH | DE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 46.2% | -5.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 9.2% | -22.1% |
| Gross margin | 35.8% | 35.7% |
| Operating margin | 13.5% | 19% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 23.8% | 18.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.82 | 2.29 |
Performance
DE leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | CRH | DE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 6.3% | -2.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.2% | -10.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -14.8% | 4.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -27.4% | 7.6% |
| Year to date | -31.7% | 35.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -27.1% | 38.3% |
Technicals
DE has the stronger structure| Metric | CRH | DE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 58 | 36.9 |
| ADX (14) | 32 | 19.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3% | -3.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -19.4% | 5.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 28% | 30.6% |
Risk
CRH is the more resilient| Metric | CRH | DE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.31 | 0.48 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.96 | 1.02 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.68 | 1.81 |
| Max drawdown | -39.7% | -20.1% |
| Current drawdown | -35.1% | -10.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 32.3% | 32.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.5% | -2.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CRH or DE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CRH is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 51 against DE's 34. The edge comes from momentum and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CRH or DE the better buy right now?
CRH carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CRH over DE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CRH leads Momentum by 30 points; CRH leads Quality by 24 points; CRH leads Risk Resilience by 12 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CRH or DE?
Analyst price targets imply +48.5% upside for CRH and +12.6% for DE, so the Street currently favors CRH. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CRH or DE?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CRH or DE?
CRH on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CRH or DE?
CRH on the Momentum factor, by 30 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CRH or DE?
CRH is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CRH on Risk Resilience, by 12 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CRH more profitable than DE?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 35.8% vs 35.7%; operating margin 13.5% vs 19%; ttm roe 23.8% vs 18.1%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is CRH's lead over DE getting stronger or weaker?
CRH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 17 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-21, when DE moved ahead of CRH.
What would change the CRH vs DE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DE closes the Momentum gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to CRH's edge; DE's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; CRH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CRH and DE?
CRH: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. DE: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CRH is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On DE it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare CRH and DE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.