CTSH vs DXC Stock Comparison
CTSH currently leads DXC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 69 vs 55. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between CTSH and DXC?
CTSH leads the current stock comparison as Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation vs DXC Technology Company
CTSH leads
CTSH leads by 14 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support CTSH, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
DXC Technology Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CTSH over DXC, 69 versus 55 as of Oct 21, 2026. CTSH's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. CTSH also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CTSH today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. CTSH lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 14 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and DXC Technology Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare CTSH and DXC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality57 vs 20CTSH +37
- Risk Resilience61 vs 43CTSH +18
- Momentum82 vs 79Even
- Value73 vs 75Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor CTSH. CTSH’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
CTSH's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CTSH and DXC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CTSH (Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
DXC (DXC Technology Company): the counter-case, on technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 51.6% against 41.5%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CTSHCTSH on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DXCDXC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
CTSHCTSH on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
CTSHCTSH on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CTSH | DXC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -9.3% | -18.1% | CTSH has more room |
| Target dispersion | +69.7% | +43.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CTSH. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CTSH | 69 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | CTSHon balance | revenue growth 1.3% vs -4.2%; EPS growth -2.2% vs 193.8%; TTM ROE 14.9% vs 4.1%; gross margin 32% vs 13.7%; operating margin 15.8% vs 3.4% — CTSH takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 73 vs 75 |
| Technicals | DXC | Price vs 50-day 14.5% vs 34.1%; vs 200-day 11.7% vs 23.3% |
| Risk Resilience | CTSH | Risk Resilience 61 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | CTSH | Target upside -9.3% vs -18.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CTSH and DXC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 14 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CTSH.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20CTSH lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 14 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CTSH +14
- 69 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- CTSH +13
- 68 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- CTSH +13
- 57 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- CTSH +18
- 65 vs 47
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only CTSH
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.90%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only DXC
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.38%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.43%)
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, MACD Bullish Crossover.
CTSH leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.01%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +5.26%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DXC closes the Quality gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to CTSH's edge.
- 2DXC's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3CTSH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
CTSH leads on balance| Metric | CTSH | DXC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 1.3% | -4.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -2.2% | 193.8% |
| Gross margin | 32% | 13.7% |
| Operating margin | 15.8% | 3.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 14.9% | 4.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.14 | 1.37 |
Performance
DXC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | CTSH | DXC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 11.2% | 14.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 16.2% | 28.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 47.5% | 45.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 11.8% | 11.5% |
| Year to date | -17.9% | -0.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 1.8% | 11.1% |
Technicals
DXC has the stronger structure| Metric | CTSH | DXC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 76.9 | 86.4 |
| ADX (14) | 26.3 | 33.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | 14.5% | 34.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 11.7% | 23.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 41.5% | 51.6% |
Risk
CTSH is the more resilient| Metric | CTSH | DXC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.13 | 0.5 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.19 | 0.45 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.28 | 0.58 |
| Max drawdown | -55.3% | -46.7% |
| Current drawdown | -21.4% | -5.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 42.1% | 57.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.7% | -5.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CTSH or DXC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CTSH is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 69 against DXC's 55. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CTSH or DXC the better buy right now?
CTSH carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CTSH over DXC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CTSH leads Quality by 37 points; CTSH leads Risk Resilience by 18 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CTSH or DXC?
Analyst price targets imply -9.3% upside for CTSH and -18.1% for DXC, so the Street currently favors CTSH. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CTSH or DXC?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CTSH or DXC?
DXC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CTSH or DXC?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CTSH or DXC?
CTSH is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CTSH on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CTSH more profitable than DXC?
CTSH leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 32% vs 13.7%; operating margin 15.8% vs 3.4%; ttm roe 14.9% vs 4.1%.
Is CTSH's lead over DXC getting stronger or weaker?
CTSH lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 14 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the CTSH vs DXC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DXC closes the Quality gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to CTSH's edge; DXC's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; CTSH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CTSH and DXC?
CTSH: 5 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. DXC: 3 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CTSH is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On DXC it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare CTSH and DXC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.