D vs DTE Stock Comparison
DTE currently leads D in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 51 vs 49. The clearest difference is value, while D has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between D and DTE?
DTE leads the current stock comparison as DTE Energy Company, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Dominion Energy, Inc. vs DTE Energy Company
DTE leads
DTE leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support DTE, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Dominion Energy, Inc.
DTE Energy Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DTE over D, 51 versus 49 as of Oct 31, 2026. DTE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while D holds the stronger quality profile. DTE also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DTE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. DTE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Dominion Energy, Inc. and DTE Energy Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare D and DTE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value49 vs 57DTE +8
- Quality33 vs 27D +6
- Momentum67 vs 71DTE +4
- Risk Resilience54 vs 51Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor DTE. DTE’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; D keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -13
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
The lead changed hands: DTE moved ahead of D in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — D and DTE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DTE (DTE Energy Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
D (Dominion Energy, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DTEDTE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DTEDTE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DTEDTE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
DTEDTE on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
DTEDTE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
DTEDTE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | D | DTE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +4.8% | +9.5% | DTE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +25.8% | +27% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | D | DTE |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | -5.00% | 1.47% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $3.450 | $4.123 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.670 | $4.435 |
| Years increased | 1 | 3 |
| No cut in window | No (2) | No (2) |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
DTE grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 1.47% a year against D's -5.00%.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DTE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 49 vs 51 |
| Fundamentals | Don balance | revenue growth -11.4% vs -35.1%; EPS growth -46.4% vs 14.3%; TTM ROE 8.9% vs 10.8%; gross margin 49.3% vs 36.7%; operating margin 25.1% vs 12.3% — D takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DTE | Value 49 vs 57 |
| Technicals | D | Price vs 50-day 4.4% vs 3.9%; vs 200-day -0.7% vs -6.4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 54 vs 51 |
| Analyst expectations | DTE | Target upside 4.8% vs 9.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of D and DTE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DTE.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28DTE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DTE +2
- 49 vs 51
- 7 sessions ago
- D +2
- 53 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- DTE +2
- 40 vs 42
- 90 sessions ago
- D +4
- 46 vs 42
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 28 when DTE moved ahead of D.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only D
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
DTE leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.3%, AIQ -4 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.72%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1D closes the Value gap — currently 8 points behind, the largest single contributor to DTE's edge.
- 2D's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3DTE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
D leads on balance| Metric | D | DTE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -11.4% | -35.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -46.4% | 14.3% |
| Gross margin | 49.3% | 36.7% |
| Operating margin | 25.1% | 12.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8.9% | 10.8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.85 | 2.29 |
Performance
D leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | D | DTE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.1% | 1.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 6.2% | 8.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.8% | -6.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.8% | -10.2% |
| Year to date | 9.7% | 2.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 5.3% | -7% |
Technicals
D has the stronger structure| Metric | D | DTE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 63.3 | 66.2 |
| ADX (14) | 28.4 | 23.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.4% | 3.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.7% | -6.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 23% | 18.3% |
Risk
Split| Metric | D | DTE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.12 | -0.03 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.28 | -0.45 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.48 | -0.72 |
| Max drawdown | -15.9% | -21.8% |
| Current drawdown | -10.3% | -14.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 21% | 17.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2% | -1.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, D or DTE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DTE is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 51 against D's 49. The edge comes from value and momentum. D is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is D or DTE the better buy right now?
DTE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DTE over D?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DTE leads Value by 8 points; D leads Quality by 6 points; DTE leads Momentum by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, D or DTE?
Analyst price targets imply +4.8% upside for D and +9.5% for DTE, so the Street currently favors DTE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, D or DTE?
DTE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DTE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, D or DTE?
DTE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, D or DTE?
DTE on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, D or DTE?
DTE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DTE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is D more profitable than DTE?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 49.3% vs 36.7%; operating margin 25.1% vs 12.3%; ttm roe 8.9% vs 10.8%. D leads on two measures and DTE on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is DTE's lead over D getting stronger or weaker?
DTE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-28, when DTE moved ahead of D.
What would change the D vs DTE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: D closes the Value gap — currently 8 points behind, the largest single contributor to DTE's edge; d's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; DTE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about D and DTE?
D: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. DTE: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on D is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On DTE it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare D and DTE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.