D vs DUK Stock Comparison
Compare D and DUK across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between D and DUK?
DUK leads the current stock comparison as Duke Energy Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Dominion Energy, Inc. vs Duke Energy Corporation
DUK leads
DUK leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support DUK, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Dominion Energy, Inc.
Duke Energy Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DUK over D, 45 versus 42 as of Sep 11, 2026. DUK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while D holds the stronger risk resilience profile. DUK also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DUK today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. DUK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Dominion Energy, Inc. and Duke Energy Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare D and DUK against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality33 vs 45DUK +12
- Risk Resilience58 vs 52D +6
- Value49 vs 53DUK +4
- Momentum34 vs 31Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor DUK. DUK’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; D keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
DUK's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — D and DUK both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DUK (Duke Energy Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
D (Dominion Energy, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DUKDUK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DUKDUK on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DUKDUK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
DD on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
DUKDUK on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | D | DUK | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8.7% | +14.6% | DUK has more room |
| Target dispersion | +21.5% | +7.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DUK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 42 vs 45 |
| Fundamentals | DUKon balance | revenue growth -11.4% vs -17.3%; EPS growth -46.4% vs -29.9%; TTM ROE 8.9% vs 9.9%; gross margin 49.3% vs 68.2%; operating margin 25.1% vs 27.6% — DUK takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DUK | Value 49 vs 53 |
| Technicals | D | Price vs 50-day -6.1% vs -3.9%; vs 200-day 1.3% vs -3.7% |
| Risk Resilience | D | Risk Resilience 58 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | DUK | Target upside 8.7% vs 14.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of D and DUK and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DUK.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10DUK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DUK +3
- 42 vs 45
- 7 sessions ago
- DUK +3
- 41 vs 44
- 30 sessions ago
- DUK +2
- 43 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- DUK +3
- 51 vs 54
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Jun 23 when DUK moved ahead of D.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.78%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.05%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
D is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.06%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.04%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1D closes the Quality gap — currently 12 points behind, the largest single contributor to DUK's edge.
- 2D's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3DUK's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DUK leads on balance| Metric | D | DUK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -11.4% | -17.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -46.4% | -29.9% |
| Gross margin | 49.3% | 68.2% |
| Operating margin | 25.1% | 27.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8.9% | 9.9% |
| Debt to equity | 1.85 | 1.67 |
Performance
D leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | D | DUK |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.5% | -1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.4% | -3.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -2.6% | -4.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 4.6% | -8.2% |
| Year to date | 11% | 1.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 12.3% | -0.7% |
Technicals
D has the stronger structure| Metric | D | DUK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 32.7 | 37.4 |
| ADX (14) | 25.8 | 18.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.1% | -3.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.3% | -3.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 13.2% | 13.8% |
Risk
D is the more resilient| Metric | D | DUK |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.08 | -0.3 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.4 | -0.22 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.65 | -0.34 |
| Max drawdown | -10.7% | -11.7% |
| Current drawdown | -9.3% | -10.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 20.5% | 16.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -1.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, D or DUK?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DUK is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 45 against D's 42. The edge comes from quality and value. D is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is D or DUK the better buy right now?
DUK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DUK over D?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DUK leads Quality by 12 points; D leads Risk Resilience by 6 points; DUK leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, D or DUK?
Analyst price targets imply +8.7% upside for D and +14.6% for DUK, so the Street currently favors DUK. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, D or DUK?
DUK is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DUK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, D or DUK?
DUK on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, D or DUK?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, D or DUK?
D is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. D on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is D more profitable than DUK?
DUK leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 49.3% vs 68.2%; operating margin 25.1% vs 27.6%; ttm roe 8.9% vs 9.9%.
Is DUK's lead over D getting stronger or weaker?
DUK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-23, when DUK moved ahead of D.
What would change the D vs DUK verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: D closes the Quality gap — currently 12 points behind, the largest single contributor to DUK's edge; d's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; DUK's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about D and DUK?
D: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. DUK: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on D is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On DUK it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare D and DUK with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.