DD vs DOW Stock Comparison
Compare DD and DOW across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DD and DOW?
DD leads the current stock comparison as DuPont de Nemours, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. vs Dow Inc.
DD leads
DD leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from DOW. Wall Street currently favors DOW on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support DD, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
Dow Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DD over DOW, 46 versus 40 as of Sep 11, 2026. DD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while DOW holds the stronger value profile. DD also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors DOW. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. DD lead: Reversed — DOW led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; DD now leads by 6.
Compare DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and Dow Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DD and DOW against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience76 vs 55DD +21
- Quality42 vs 22DD +20
- Value50 vs 65DOW +15
- Momentum26 vs 24Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor DD. DD’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; DOW keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
New signals
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
DD's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DD and DOW both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DD (DuPont de Nemours, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
DOW (Dow Inc.): the counter-case, on value, fundamentals, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 32% against 20.3%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DDDD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DOWDOW on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DOWDOW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
DDDD on Risk Resilience, by 21 points.
Analyst upside
DOWDOW on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors DD, analyst targets favor DOW. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | DD | DOW | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -36.1% | +36.2% | DOW has more room |
| Target dispersion | +153.9% | +58.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DD | 46 vs 40 |
| Fundamentals | DOWon balance | revenue growth 8.2% vs 23.5%; EPS growth -9.4% vs 235.1%; gross margin 34.4% vs 9.8% — DOW takes 2 of 3 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DOW | Value 50 vs 65 |
| Technicals | DD | Price vs 50-day -7.9% vs -3.5%; vs 200-day 23% vs -6.2% |
| Risk Resilience | DD | Risk Resilience 76 vs 55 |
| Analyst expectations | DOW | Target upside -36.1% vs 36.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DD and DOW and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DD.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10DD lead: Reversed — DOW led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; DD now leads by 6.
- Today
- DD +6
- 46 vs 40
- 7 sessions ago
- DD +2
- 44 vs 42
- 30 sessions ago
- DOW +3
- 49 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- DD +6
- 46 vs 40
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Sep 4 when DD moved ahead of DOW.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (33.15%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (5.02%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
DD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.26%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -2.06%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DOW closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to DD's edge.
- 2DOW's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3DD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DOW leads on balance| Metric | DD | DOW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.2% | 23.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -9.4% | 235.1% |
| Gross margin | 34.4% | 9.8% |
| Operating margin | 14.7% | -0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 0.3% | -6.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.23 | 0.85 |
Performance
DD leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | DD | DOW |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.2% | -5.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -11.8% | -3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 182.6% | -13.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -7.7% | -13.8% |
| Year to date | 5.6% | 26.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 30.5% | 23.6% |
Technicals
DD has the stronger structure| Metric | DD | DOW |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 21 | 24.4 |
| ADX (14) | 23.5 | 11.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -7.9% | -3.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 23% | -6.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 20.3% | 32% |
Risk
DD is the more resilient| Metric | DD | DOW |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.7 | 0 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.77 | 0.59 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.68 | 1.06 |
| Max drawdown | -72.5% | -35.5% |
| Current drawdown | -17.6% | -29.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 209.4% | 44.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -3.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DD or DOW?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DD is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 46 against DOW's 40. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. DOW is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DD or DOW the better buy right now?
DD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DD over DOW?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DD leads Risk Resilience by 21 points; DD leads Quality by 20 points; DOW leads Value by 15 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DD or DOW?
Analyst price targets imply -36.1% upside for DD and +36.2% for DOW, so the Street currently favors DOW. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors DD. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DD or DOW?
DOW is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DOW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DD or DOW?
DOW on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DD or DOW?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DD or DOW?
DD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DD on Risk Resilience, by 21 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DD more profitable than DOW?
DD leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 34.4% vs 9.8%; operating margin 14.7% vs -0.1%; ttm roe 0.3% vs -6.6%.
Is DD's lead over DOW getting stronger or weaker?
DD lead: Reversed — DOW led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; DD now leads by 6. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-04, when DD moved ahead of DOW.
What would change the DD vs DOW verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DOW closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to DD's edge; DOW's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; DD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DD and DOW?
DD: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. DOW: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On DOW it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare DD and DOW with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.