DE vs JHX Stock Comparison
JHX currently leads DE in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 48 vs 34. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between DE and JHX?
JHX leads the current stock comparison as James Hardie Industries plc, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Deere & Company vs James Hardie Industries plc
JHX leads
JHX leads by 14 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from DE.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support JHX, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Deere & Company
James Hardie Industries plc
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JHX over DE, 48 versus 34 as of Oct 22, 2026. JHX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience. JHX also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JHX today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. JHX lead: Reversed — DE led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; JHX now leads by 14. JHX leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Deere & Company and James Hardie Industries plc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DE and JHX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum21 vs 58JHX +37
- Risk Resilience48 vs 58JHX +10
- Value38 vs 44JHX +6
- Quality34 vs 38JHX +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor JHX. JHX’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
JHX's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DE and JHX both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JHXJHX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
JHXJHX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JHXJHX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
JHXJHX on the Momentum factor, by 37 points.
Lower downside
JHXJHX on Risk Resilience, by 10 points.
Analyst upside
JHXJHX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DE | JHX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +12.6% | +22.8% | JHX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +33.9% | +58.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JHX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JHX | 34 vs 48 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth -5.7% vs 5%; EPS growth -22.1% vs 266.6%; TTM ROE 18.1% vs 2.3%; gross margin 35.7% vs 35.9%; operating margin 19% vs 13.3% |
| Valuation | JHX | Value 38 vs 44 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -3.1% vs -4.9%; vs 200-day 5.6% vs 9.4% |
| Risk Resilience | JHX | Risk Resilience 48 vs 58 |
| Analyst expectations | JHX | Target upside 12.6% vs 22.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DE and JHX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 14 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JHX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20JHX lead: Reversed — DE led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; JHX now leads by 14.
- Today
- JHX +14
- 34 vs 48
- 7 sessions ago
- JHX +11
- 34 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- DE +3
- 43 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- JHX +13
- 38 vs 51
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Oct 2 when DE moved ahead of JHX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only DE
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only JHX
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active.
DE is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.69%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.57%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DE closes the Momentum gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to JHX's edge.
- 2DE's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3JHX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | DE | JHX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -5.7% | 5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -22.1% | 266.6% |
| Gross margin | 35.7% | 35.9% |
| Operating margin | 19% | 13.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 18.1% | 2.3% |
| Debt to equity | 2.29 | 0.69 |
Performance
JHX leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | DE | JHX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.7% | 7.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -10.1% | -3.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.1% | 6.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 7.6% | 19.8% |
| Year to date | 35.8% | 27.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 38.3% | 21.9% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | DE | JHX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.9 | 60.4 |
| ADX (14) | 19.4 | 25.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3.1% | -4.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.6% | 9.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 30.6% | 33.7% |
Risk
JHX is the more resilient| Metric | DE | JHX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.48 | 1.72 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.02 | 0.58 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.81 | 1.04 |
| Max drawdown | -20.1% | -32.4% |
| Current drawdown | -10.9% | -14.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 32.9% | 44.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.7% | -4.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DE or JHX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JHX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 48 against DE's 34. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DE or JHX the better buy right now?
JHX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JHX over DE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JHX leads Momentum by 37 points; JHX leads Risk Resilience by 10 points; JHX leads Value by 6 points. JHX leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by DE simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, DE or JHX?
Analyst price targets imply +12.6% upside for DE and +22.8% for JHX, so the Street currently favors JHX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DE or JHX?
JHX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JHX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DE or JHX?
JHX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DE or JHX?
JHX on the Momentum factor, by 37 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DE or JHX?
JHX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. JHX on Risk Resilience, by 10 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DE more profitable than JHX?
DE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 35.7% vs 35.9%; operating margin 19% vs 13.3%; ttm roe 18.1% vs 2.3%.
Is JHX's lead over DE getting stronger or weaker?
JHX lead: Reversed — DE led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; JHX now leads by 14. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-02, when DE moved ahead of JHX.
What would change the DE vs JHX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DE closes the Momentum gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to JHX's edge; DE's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; JHX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DE and JHX?
DE: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. JHX: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On JHX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DE and JHX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.