DELL vs STX Stock Comparison
DELL currently leads STX in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 39 vs 21. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between DELL and STX?
DELL leads the current stock comparison as Dell Technologies Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Dell Technologies Inc. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
DELL leads
DELL leads by 18 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, and the lead has widened from 6 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors STX on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support DELL, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Dell Technologies Inc.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DELL over STX, 39 versus 21 as of Oct 21, 2026. DELL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality. DELL also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors STX. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DELL today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has swung materially session to session. DELL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 18 points over 30 sessions. DELL leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Dell Technologies Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DELL and STX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value59 vs 25DELL +34
- Quality39 vs 27DELL +12
- Momentum17 vs 8DELL +9
- Risk Resilience34 vs 25DELL +9
4 of 6 evidence groups favor DELL. DELL’s edge is concentrated in value and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
DELL's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DELL and STX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DELL (Dell Technologies Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
STX (Seagate Technology Holdings plc): the counter-case, on fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DELLDELL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
STXSTX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DELLDELL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 34 points.
Momentum
DELLDELL on the Momentum factor, by 9 points.
Lower downside
DELLDELL on Risk Resilience, by 9 points.
Analyst upside
STXSTX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors DELL, analyst targets favor STX. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | DELL | STX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +1.7% | +38.9% | STX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +114.3% | +101.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 17 | 13 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DELL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DELL | 39 vs 21 |
| Fundamentals | STXon balance | revenue growth 31.3% vs 16.6%; EPS growth 52.7% vs 72.5%; TTM ROE -5.7% vs 3.5%; gross margin 19.8% vs 45.6%; operating margin 9.5% vs 33.6% — STX takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DELL | Value 59 vs 25 |
| Technicals | DELL | Price vs 50-day -5.4% vs -16.6%; vs 200-day 45.5% vs -0.5% |
| Risk Resilience | DELL | Risk Resilience 34 vs 25 |
| Analyst expectations | STX | Target upside 1.7% vs 38.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DELL and STX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 18 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DELL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20DELL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 18 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DELL +18
- 39 vs 21
- 7 sessions ago
- DELL +15
- 38 vs 23
- 30 sessions ago
- DELL +6
- 46 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- DELL +14
- 57 vs 43
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only STX
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, MACD Bearish Crossover.
DELL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +5.27%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.22%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1STX closes the Value gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to DELL's edge.
- 2STX's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3DELL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
STX leads on balance| Metric | DELL | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 31.3% | 16.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 52.7% | 72.5% |
| Gross margin | 19.8% | 45.6% |
| Operating margin | 9.5% | 33.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -5.7% | 3.5% |
| Debt to equity | -24.15 | 1.78 |
Performance
DELL leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | DELL | STX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -17.6% | -9.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -15.9% | -25.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.5% | -24.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 117.3% | 22.1% |
| Year to date | 266.7% | 145.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 205% | 200.1% |
Technicals
DELL has the stronger structure| Metric | DELL | STX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 32.8 | 23.3 |
| ADX (14) | 25.2 | 26 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.4% | -16.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 45.5% | -0.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 59.9% | 64.7% |
Risk
DELL is the more resilient| Metric | DELL | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.36 | 2.38 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.8 | 1.77 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.66 | 3.05 |
| Max drawdown | -32.6% | -41.6% |
| Current drawdown | -21.6% | -38.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 75.8% | 76.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6% | -7.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DELL or STX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DELL is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 39 against STX's 21. The edge comes from value and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DELL or STX the better buy right now?
DELL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DELL over STX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DELL leads Value by 34 points; DELL leads Quality by 12 points; DELL leads Momentum by 9 points. DELL leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by STX simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, DELL or STX?
Analyst price targets imply +1.7% upside for DELL and +38.9% for STX, so the Street currently favors STX. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors DELL. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DELL or STX?
DELL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DELL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 34 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DELL or STX?
STX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DELL or STX?
DELL on the Momentum factor, by 9 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DELL or STX?
DELL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DELL on Risk Resilience, by 9 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DELL more profitable than STX?
STX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 19.8% vs 45.6%; operating margin 9.5% vs 33.6%; ttm roe -5.7% vs 3.5%.
Is DELL's lead over STX getting stronger or weaker?
DELL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 18 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the DELL vs STX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: STX closes the Value gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to DELL's edge; STX's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; DELL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DELL and STX?
DELL: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. STX: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DELL is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On STX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DELL and STX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.