DG vs FIVE Stock Comparison
Compare DG and FIVE across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DG and FIVE?
FIVE leads the current stock comparison as Five Below, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Dollar General Corporation vs Five Below, Inc.
FIVE leads
FIVE leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support FIVE, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Dollar General Corporation
Five Below, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FIVE over DG, 46 versus 45 as of Sep 11, 2026. FIVE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while DG holds the stronger value profile. FIVE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FIVE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. FIVE lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Dollar General Corporation and Five Below, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DG and FIVE against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value57 vs 27DG +30
- Quality38 vs 54FIVE +16
- Risk Resilience37 vs 53FIVE +16
- Momentum44 vs 57FIVE +13
4 of 6 evidence groups favor FIVE. FIVE’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; DG keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -14
New signals
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
The lead changed hands: FIVE moved ahead of DG in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DG and FIVE both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
FIVE (Five Below, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
DG (Dollar General Corporation): the counter-case, on value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FIVEFIVE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DGDG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DGDG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 30 points.
Momentum
FIVEFIVE on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
FIVEFIVE on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
FIVEFIVE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DG | FIVE | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8.5% | +14.5% | FIVE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +39.9% | +73.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 15 | 15 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FIVE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 45 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | FIVEon balance | revenue growth 4.7% vs -25.6%; EPS growth 23.3% vs -48.4%; TTM ROE 19.6% vs 21.1%; gross margin 31.2% vs 34.8%; operating margin 5.6% vs 11% — FIVE takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DG | Value 57 vs 27 |
| Technicals | FIVE | Price vs 50-day 1.1% vs 10.1%; vs 200-day -2.7% vs 15% |
| Risk Resilience | FIVE | Risk Resilience 37 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | FIVE | Target upside 8.5% vs 14.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DG and FIVE and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FIVE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10FIVE lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- FIVE +1
- 45 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- DG +7
- 55 vs 48
- 30 sessions ago
- FIVE +10
- 44 vs 54
- 90 sessions ago
- DG +7
- 47 vs 40
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Sep 10 when FIVE moved ahead of DG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.58%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (5.84%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
FIVE leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.29%, AIQ -4 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.38%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DG closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to FIVE's edge.
- 2DG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3FIVE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 9 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate FIVE's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
FIVE leads on balance| Metric | DG | FIVE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.7% | -25.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 23.3% | -48.4% |
| Gross margin | 31.2% | 34.8% |
| Operating margin | 5.6% | 11% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 19.6% | 21.1% |
| Debt to equity | 1.68 | 0.86 |
Performance
FIVE leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | DG | FIVE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -6% | -0.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.8% | 1.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 11.8% | 23.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -15.1% | 10.4% |
| Year to date | -7.4% | 28.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 13.1% | 59.5% |
Technicals
FIVE has the stronger structure| Metric | DG | FIVE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 53.5 | 52.9 |
| ADX (14) | 14.7 | 37.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.1% | 10.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -2.7% | 15% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 34.3% | 44% |
Risk
FIVE is the more resilient| Metric | DG | FIVE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.53 | 1.1 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.52 | 1.41 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.85 | 1.96 |
| Max drawdown | -34.9% | -28.9% |
| Current drawdown | -21.3% | -8.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.4% | 40.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | -3.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DG or FIVE?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FIVE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 46 against DG's 45. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. DG is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DG or FIVE the better buy right now?
FIVE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FIVE over DG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DG leads Value by 30 points; FIVE leads Quality by 16 points; FIVE leads Risk Resilience by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DG or FIVE?
Analyst price targets imply +8.5% upside for DG and +14.5% for FIVE, so the Street currently favors FIVE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DG or FIVE?
DG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 30 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DG or FIVE?
DG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DG or FIVE?
FIVE on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DG or FIVE?
FIVE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. FIVE on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DG more profitable than FIVE?
FIVE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 31.2% vs 34.8%; operating margin 5.6% vs 11%; ttm roe 19.6% vs 21.1%.
Is FIVE's lead over DG getting stronger or weaker?
FIVE lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-10, when FIVE moved ahead of DG.
What would change the DG vs FIVE verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DG closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to FIVE's edge; DG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; FIVE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 9 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate FIVE's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about DG and FIVE?
DG: 1 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. FIVE: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On FIVE it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DG and FIVE with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.