DHI vs FIG Stock Comparison
Compare DHI and FIG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DHI and FIG?
DHI leads the current stock comparison as D.R. Horton, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
D.R. Horton, Inc. vs Figma, Inc.
DHI leads
DHI leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 2 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors FIG on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support DHI, and its lead is widening.
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Figma, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DHI over FIG, 50 versus 43 as of Sep 6, 2026. DHI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while FIG holds the stronger quality profile. DHI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors FIG. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DHI today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability. DHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare D.R. Horton, Inc. and Figma, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DHI and FIG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%58 vs 26DHI +32
- Quality30%48 vs 59FIG +11
- Risk Resilience15%64 vs 57DHI +7
- Momentum25%33 vs 37FIG +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor DHI. DHI’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; FIG keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
DHI's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DHI and FIG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DHI (D.R. Horton, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
FIG (Figma, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, momentum, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 86% against 34.5%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DHIDHI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
DHIDHI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DHIDHI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points.
Momentum
FIGFIG on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
DHIDHI on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
FIGFIG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors DHI, analyst targets favor FIG. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | DHI | FIG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.7% | +25.6% | FIG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +30.5% | +52.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DHI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DHI | 50 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | DHIon balance | revenue growth 22.1% vs 11%; EPS growth 41.8% vs 22.2%; TTM ROE 12.8% vs -108.2%; gross margin 22.6% vs 79.1%; operating margin 11.6% vs -123.8% — DHI takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DHI | Value 58 vs 26 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -4.4% vs -0.2%; vs 200-day -4.7% vs -7% |
| Risk Resilience | DHI | Risk Resilience 64 vs 57 |
| Analyst expectations | FIG | Target upside 14.7% vs 25.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DHI and FIG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DHI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5DHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DHI +7
- 50 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- FIG +2
- 50 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- DHI +2
- 52 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- DHI +7
- 57 vs 50
The lead changed hands 9 times in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when DHI moved ahead of FIG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.35%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (7.29%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.15%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -4.36%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1FIG closes the Value gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to DHI's edge.
- 2FIG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3DHI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DHI leads on balance| Metric | DHI | FIG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 22.1% | 11% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 41.8% | 22.2% |
| Gross margin | 22.6% | 79.1% |
| Operating margin | 11.6% | -123.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12.8% | -108.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.3 | 0.05 |
Performance
DHI leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | DHI | FIG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.1% | -16.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.5% | 3.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -2% | 10.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -3.1% | -17.1% |
| Year to date | -0.9% | -35.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -16.6% | -64.6% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | DHI | FIG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 42.1 | 46.7 |
| ADX (14) | 11.8 | 13.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.4% | -0.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -4.7% | -7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 34.5% | 86% |
Risk
DHI is the more resilient| Metric | DHI | FIG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.85 | 1.32 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.53 | -0.69 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.98 | -1.29 |
| Max drawdown | -28% | -76.3% |
| Current drawdown | -22.4% | -66.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 35.7% | 79.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.4% | -7.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DHI or FIG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DHI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 50 against FIG's 43. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. FIG is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DHI or FIG the better buy right now?
DHI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DHI over FIG?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. DHI leads Value by 32 points; FIG leads Quality by 11 points; DHI leads Risk Resilience by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DHI or FIG?
Analyst price targets imply +14.7% upside for DHI and +25.6% for FIG, so the Street currently favors FIG. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors DHI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DHI or FIG?
DHI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DHI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DHI or FIG?
DHI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DHI or FIG?
FIG on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DHI or FIG?
DHI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DHI on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DHI more profitable than FIG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 22.6% vs 79.1%; operating margin 11.6% vs -123.8%; ttm roe 12.8% vs -108.2%. DHI leads on two measures and FIG on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is DHI's lead over FIG getting stronger or weaker?
DHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has changed hands 9 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when DHI moved ahead of FIG.
What would change the DHI vs FIG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: FIG closes the Value gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to DHI's edge; FIG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; DHI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DHI and FIG?
DHI: 0 bullish / 3 bearish. FIG: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on DHI is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On FIG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare DHI and FIG with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.