DHI vs GRBK Stock Comparison
DHI currently leads GRBK in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 53 vs 50. The clearest difference is momentum, while GRBK has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between DHI and GRBK?
DHI leads the current stock comparison as D.R. Horton, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
D.R. Horton, Inc. vs Green Brick Partners, Inc.
DHI leads
DHI leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 0 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 5 evidence groups support DHI, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Green Brick Partners, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DHI over GRBK, 53 versus 50 as of Oct 22, 2026. DHI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while GRBK holds the stronger quality profile. DHI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor DHI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. DHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare D.R. Horton, Inc. and Green Brick Partners, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DHI and GRBK against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum48 vs 30DHI +18
- Quality48 vs 57GRBK +9
- Risk Resilience64 vs 58DHI +6
- Value58 vs 57Even
2 of 5 evidence groups favor DHI. DHI’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; GRBK keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +10
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +6
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
DHI's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DHI and GRBK both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DHI (D.R. Horton, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
GRBK (Green Brick Partners, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DHIDHI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DHIDHI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
DHIDHI on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
DHIDHI on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DHI | GRBK | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +13% | — | Level |
| Target dispersion | +34.4% | — | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor DHI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 53 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | GRBKon balance | revenue growth 22.1% vs 6.1%; EPS growth 41.8% vs 22.1%; TTM ROE 12.8% vs 15.4%; gross margin 22.6% vs 31.2%; operating margin 11.6% vs 19.5% — GRBK takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 58 vs 57 |
| Technicals | DHI | Price vs 50-day -1.7% vs -10.7%; vs 200-day -5.2% vs -11.1% |
| Risk Resilience | DHI | Risk Resilience 64 vs 58 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DHI and GRBK and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DHI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20DHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DHI +3
- 53 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- DHI +3
- 52 vs 49
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 53 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- GRBK +3
- 51 vs 54
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Oct 13 when DHI moved ahead of GRBK.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only DHI
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish
Only GRBK
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active.
DHI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.85%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.11%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1GRBK closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to DHI's edge.
- 2GRBK's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3DHI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
GRBK leads on balance| Metric | DHI | GRBK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 22.1% | 6.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 41.8% | 22.1% |
| Gross margin | 22.6% | 31.2% |
| Operating margin | 11.6% | 19.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12.8% | 15.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.3 | 0.16 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | DHI | GRBK |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.5% | 0.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -2.7% | -9.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1.6% | -13.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -13.6% | -12.6% |
| Year to date | -2.7% | -1.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -8.3% | -7.5% |
Technicals
DHI has the stronger structure| Metric | DHI | GRBK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 55.3 | 36.3 |
| ADX (14) | 11.2 | 19.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.7% | -10.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -5.2% | -11.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 32.4% | 29.1% |
Risk
DHI is the more resilient| Metric | DHI | GRBK |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.92 | 0.9 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.2 | -0.21 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.39 | -0.39 |
| Max drawdown | -21% | -25.4% |
| Current drawdown | -16.5% | -23.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 35.4% | 32.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DHI or GRBK?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DHI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 53 against GRBK's 50. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. GRBK is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DHI or GRBK the better buy right now?
DHI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DHI over GRBK?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DHI leads Momentum by 18 points; GRBK leads Quality by 9 points; DHI leads Risk Resilience by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DHI or GRBK?
Analyst price targets imply +13% upside for DHI and not covered for GRBK. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DHI or GRBK?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DHI or GRBK?
DHI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DHI or GRBK?
DHI on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DHI or GRBK?
DHI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DHI on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DHI more profitable than GRBK?
GRBK leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 22.6% vs 31.2%; operating margin 11.6% vs 19.5%; ttm roe 12.8% vs 15.4%.
Is DHI's lead over GRBK getting stronger or weaker?
DHI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-13, when DHI moved ahead of GRBK.
What would change the DHI vs GRBK verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: GRBK closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to DHI's edge; GRBK's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; DHI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DHI and GRBK?
DHI: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. GRBK: 0 bullish / 3 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DHI is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On GRBK it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare DHI and GRBK with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.