DHI vs LEN Stock Comparison
Compare DHI and LEN across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DHI and LEN?
DHI leads the current stock comparison as D.R. Horton, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
D.R. Horton, Inc. vs Lennar Corporation
DHI leads
DHI leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Quality.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support DHI.
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Lennar Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DHI over LEN, 50 versus 48 as of Sep 6, 2026. DHI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while LEN holds the stronger value profile. DHI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DHI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. DHI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare D.R. Horton, Inc. and Lennar Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DHI and LEN against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%48 vs 37DHI +11
- Value30%58 vs 63LEN +5
- Momentum25%33 vs 34Even
- Risk Resilience15%64 vs 65Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor DHI. DHI’s edge is concentrated in quality; LEN keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
DHI's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DHI and LEN both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DHI (D.R. Horton, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
LEN (Lennar Corporation): the counter-case, on value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DHIDHI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
DHIDHI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
LENLEN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
LENLEN carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
DHIDHI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DHI | LEN | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.7% | +0.4% | DHI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +30.5% | +48.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Sell | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DHI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 50 vs 48 |
| Fundamentals | DHI | revenue growth 22.1% vs 19.9%; EPS growth 41.8% vs 30.9%; TTM ROE 12.8% vs 7.4%; gross margin 22.6% vs 8%; operating margin 11.6% vs 6% |
| Valuation | LEN | Value 58 vs 63 |
| Technicals | DHI | Price vs 50-day -4.4% vs -2.5%; vs 200-day -4.7% vs -15% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 64 vs 65 |
| Analyst expectations | DHI | Target upside 14.7% vs 0.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DHI and LEN and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DHI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5DHI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DHI +2
- 50 vs 48
- 7 sessions ago
- DHI +2
- 50 vs 48
- 30 sessions ago
- DHI +1
- 52 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- DHI +11
- 57 vs 46
The lead changed hands 9 times in this window, most recently on Aug 27 when DHI moved ahead of LEN.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.35%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (14.75%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.15%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.03%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1LEN closes the Quality gap — currently 11 points behind, the largest single contributor to DHI's edge.
- 2LEN's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3DHI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DHI leads on balance| Metric | DHI | LEN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 22.1% | 19.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 41.8% | 30.9% |
| Gross margin | 22.6% | 8% |
| Operating margin | 11.6% | 6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12.8% | 7.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.3 | 0.29 |
Performance
DHI leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | DHI | LEN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.1% | -3.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.5% | -5.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -2% | -7.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -3.1% | -17.4% |
| Year to date | -0.9% | -18.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -16.6% | -37.7% |
Technicals
DHI has the stronger structure| Metric | DHI | LEN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 42.1 | 42.2 |
| ADX (14) | 11.8 | 7.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.4% | -2.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -4.7% | -15% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 34.5% | 30.4% |
Risk
Split| Metric | DHI | LEN |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.85 | 0.91 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.53 | -1.29 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.98 | -2.16 |
| Max drawdown | -28% | -42.5% |
| Current drawdown | -22.4% | -41.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 35.7% | 36.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.4% | -3.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DHI or LEN?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DHI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 50 against LEN's 48. The edge comes from quality. LEN is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DHI or LEN the better buy right now?
DHI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DHI over LEN?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. DHI leads Quality by 11 points; LEN leads Value by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DHI or LEN?
Analyst price targets imply +14.7% upside for DHI and +0.4% for LEN, so the Street currently favors DHI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DHI or LEN?
LEN is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. LEN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 5 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DHI or LEN?
DHI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DHI or LEN?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DHI or LEN?
LEN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. LEN carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DHI more profitable than LEN?
DHI leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 22.6% vs 8%; operating margin 11.6% vs 6%; ttm roe 12.8% vs 7.4%.
Is DHI's lead over LEN getting stronger or weaker?
DHI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has changed hands 9 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-27, when DHI moved ahead of LEN.
What would change the DHI vs LEN verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: LEN closes the Quality gap — currently 11 points behind, the largest single contributor to DHI's edge; LEN's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; DHI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DHI and LEN?
DHI: 0 bullish / 3 bearish. LEN: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on DHI is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On LEN it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare DHI and LEN with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.