DIOD vs ENTG Stock Comparison
ENTG currently leads DIOD in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 48 vs 44. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between DIOD and ENTG?
ENTG leads the current stock comparison as Entegris, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Diodes Incorporated vs Entegris, Inc.
ENTG leads
ENTG leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum. Wall Street currently favors DIOD on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support ENTG, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Diodes Incorporated
Entegris, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ENTG over DIOD, 48 versus 44 as of Oct 31, 2026. ENTG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum. ENTG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors DIOD. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ENTG today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. ENTG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Diodes Incorporated and Entegris, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DIOD and ENTG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum40 vs 59ENTG +19
- Quality48 vs 45Even
- Risk Resilience42 vs 45Even
- Value46 vs 44Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor ENTG. ENTG’s edge is concentrated in momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
ENTG's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DIOD and ENTG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ENTG (Entegris, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
DIOD (Diodes Incorporated): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ENTGENTG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DIODDIOD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
ENTGENTG on the Momentum factor, by 19 points.
Lower downside
DIODDIOD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
DIODDIOD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors ENTG, analyst targets favor DIOD. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | DIOD | ENTG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +73.8% | +20.8% | DIOD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +58.9% | +33.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ENTG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ENTG | 44 vs 48 |
| Fundamentals | ENTGon balance | revenue growth 9.9% vs 8.8%; EPS growth 209.1% vs 1.7%; TTM ROE 4.5% vs 7.6%; gross margin 31.7% vs 45.5%; operating margin 4.8% vs 30% — ENTG takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 46 vs 44 |
| Technicals | ENTG | Price vs 50-day -12.7% vs 5.9%; vs 200-day 1.9% vs 15.7% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 42 vs 45 |
| Analyst expectations | DIOD | Target upside 73.8% vs 20.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DIOD and ENTG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ENTG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28ENTG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ENTG +4
- 44 vs 48
- 7 sessions ago
- DIOD +2
- 39 vs 37
- 30 sessions ago
- ENTG +2
- 54 vs 56
- 90 sessions ago
- DIOD +1
- 44 vs 43
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Oct 22 when DIOD moved ahead of ENTG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only ENTG
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
ENTG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -8.76%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -3.51%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DIOD closes the Momentum gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to ENTG's edge.
- 2DIOD's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3ENTG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ENTG leads on balance| Metric | DIOD | ENTG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.9% | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 209.1% | 1.7% |
| Gross margin | 31.7% | 45.5% |
| Operating margin | 4.8% | 30% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 4.5% | 7.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.04 | 0.86 |
Performance
ENTG leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | DIOD | ENTG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.5% | 7.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.7% | 3.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 8.9% | 36% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -11.6% | 6.7% |
| Year to date | 81% | 89.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 56.5% | 74.1% |
Technicals
ENTG has the stronger structure| Metric | DIOD | ENTG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 40.2 | 48.5 |
| ADX (14) | 20.1 | 18.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -12.7% | 5.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.9% | 15.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 64.3% | 78% |
Risk
Split| Metric | DIOD | ENTG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.55 | 3.36 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.97 | 1.09 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.55 | 1.69 |
| Max drawdown | -38% | -41.8% |
| Current drawdown | -27.3% | -13.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 67.9% | 69.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.6% | -7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DIOD or ENTG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ENTG is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 48 against DIOD's 44. The edge comes from momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DIOD or ENTG the better buy right now?
ENTG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ENTG over DIOD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ENTG leads Momentum by 19 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DIOD or ENTG?
Analyst price targets imply +73.8% upside for DIOD and +20.8% for ENTG, so the Street currently favors DIOD. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors ENTG. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DIOD or ENTG?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DIOD or ENTG?
DIOD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DIOD or ENTG?
ENTG on the Momentum factor, by 19 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DIOD or ENTG?
DIOD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DIOD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DIOD more profitable than ENTG?
ENTG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 31.7% vs 45.5%; operating margin 4.8% vs 30%; ttm roe 4.5% vs 7.6%.
Is ENTG's lead over DIOD getting stronger or weaker?
ENTG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 8 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-22, when DIOD moved ahead of ENTG.
What would change the DIOD vs ENTG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DIOD closes the Momentum gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to ENTG's edge; DIOD's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; ENTG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DIOD and ENTG?
DIOD: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. ENTG: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DIOD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ENTG it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DIOD and ENTG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.