DIOD vs ENTG Stock Comparison

Compare DIOD and ENTG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.

Market data as of Sep 11, 2026 market close· AIQ score gap 3 points
DIOD
Technology
vs
ENTG
Technology
DIOD
Diodes Incorporated
Leads
Price
$95.01
Day move
+3.65%
AIQ Score
47/100
Best edge
Momentum
Sector
Technology
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.
Price
$140
Day move
+2.16%
AIQ Score
44/100
Best edge
Balanced
Sector
Technology

What is the main difference between DIOD and ENTG?

DIOD leads the current stock comparison as Diodes Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.

AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison

Diodes Incorporated vs Entegris, Inc.

Data as of Sep 11, 2026· market close· Technology· Coverage 66/66 fields· High confidence
AIQ VerdictFragileAIQ Comparison Conviction 3/10

DIOD leads

DIOD leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum, and the lead has widened from 0 points over 30 sessions.

Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support DIOD, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.

Evidence agreement: 2 of 6Comparison trend: Strengthening
DIOD

Diodes Incorporated

Leads
AIQ Score
47/100
AIQ Edge Score
4/10
ENTG

Entegris, Inc.

AIQ Score
44/100
AIQ Edge Score
3/10

The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DIOD over ENTG, 47 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. DIOD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum. DIOD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DIOD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. DIOD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 3 points over 30 sessions.

Compare Diodes Incorporated and Entegris, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.

Currently unavailable

Performance over time

Price-return comparison using available daily close history.

DIOD
-4.4%
ENTG
+10.7%

Total return comparison

Growth of $10,000

DIOD $9,556 · ENTG $11,074

Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.

Compare DIOD and ENTG against another ticker

Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.

Basic: 2 symbols·Explorer: 3 symbols·Pro and Premium: 5 symbols·Your limit: 2

AIQ Factor Divergence

Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.

DIOD advantage
0
ENTG advantage
  • Momentum49 vs 42
    DIOD +7
  • Quality48 vs 45
    Even
  • Risk Resilience42 vs 45
    Even
  • Value46 vs 44
    Even

2 of 6 evidence groups favor DIOD. DIOD’s edge is concentrated in momentum.

What changed since the last close

Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.

DIOD+2 AIQ

Largest factor move: Momentum +7

No new signals fired.

ENTG-4 AIQ

Largest factor move: Momentum -18

No new signals fired.

The lead changed hands: DIOD moved ahead of ENTG in the latest snapshot.

Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DIOD and ENTG both carry a full feed there.

The central trade-off

DIOD (Diodes Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.

ENTG (Entegris, Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals.

Which one fits your objective

The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.

Balanced

DIOD

DIOD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.

Growth

DIOD

DIOD on combined revenue and EPS growth.

Value

Even

The two are level on Value.

Momentum

DIOD

DIOD on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.

Lower downside

ENTG

ENTG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.

Analyst upside

DIOD

DIOD on implied upside to the consensus price target.

AIQ vs Wall Street

Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.

MeasureDIODENTGNote
Implied upside to target+64.2%+25.4%DIOD has more room
Target dispersion+46.2%+56.8%Lower is tighter analyst agreement
ConsensusBuyBuyContext, not a primary driver
Analysts covering16Higher coverage generally improves confidence

Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.

AIQ Agreement Matrix

2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DIOD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.

Evidence groupFavorsReading
AIQ ScoreEven47 vs 44
FundamentalsENTGon balancerevenue growth 9.9% vs 8.8%; EPS growth 209.1% vs 1.7%; TTM ROE 4.5% vs 7.6%; gross margin 31.7% vs 45.5%; operating margin 4.8% vs 30% — ENTG takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them
ValuationEvenValue 46 vs 44
TechnicalsDIODPrice vs 50-day 2.6% vs 0.3%; vs 200-day 13.8% vs 8%
Risk ResilienceEvenRisk Resilience 42 vs 45
Analyst expectationsDIODTarget upside 64.2% vs 25.4%

✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DIOD and ENTG and are excluded from the count.

AIQ Decision Stability

Fragile

The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.

  • The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
  • Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
  • The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
  • The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
  • The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)

Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DIOD.

How the comparison changed

119 daily snapshots · May 4 Sep 10

DIOD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 3 points over 30 sessions.

May 4DIOD leads above the line · ENTG leads belowSep 10
Today
DIOD +3
47 vs 44
7 sessions ago
DIOD +2
42 vs 40
30 sessions ago
Level
48 vs 48
90 sessions ago
DIOD +1
40 vs 39

The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 10 when DIOD moved ahead of ENTG.

AIQ Signal Divergence

Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.

DIODConflicted

1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted

  • Golden Cross Active bullish, trend, long horizon (14.97%)
  • ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.52%)
  • MACD Bearish Crossover bearish, momentum, short horizon
ENTGConflicted

1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted

  • Golden Cross Active bullish, trend, long horizon (10.05%)
  • ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.37%)
  • MACD Bearish Crossover bearish, momentum, short horizon

DIOD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.

Price vs model alignment

Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.

DIODConfirmed strength

Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +3.65%, AIQ +2 points).

ENTGDivergence

Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.16%, AIQ -4 points).

What would flip this result

A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.

  1. 1ENTG closes the Momentum gap — currently 7 points behind, the largest single contributor to DIOD's edge.
  2. 2ENTG's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
  3. 3DIOD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
  4. 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.

The full evidence

Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.

Fundamentals

ENTG leads on balance
MetricDIODENTG
Revenue growth (YoY)9.9%8.8%
EPS growth (YoY)209.1%1.7%
Gross margin31.7%45.5%
Operating margin4.8%30%
Return on equity (TTM)4.5%7.6%
Debt to equity0.040.86

Performance

DIOD leads 4 of 6 windows
MetricDIODENTG
1 week (5 sessions)1.8%4.6%
1 month (20 sessions)-14.4%-14.7%
3 months (63 sessions)-8.8%6.6%
6 months (126 sessions)43.8%18.3%
Year to date85.8%63.1%
1 year (252 sessions)72.1%67.3%

Technicals

DIOD has the stronger structure
MetricDIODENTG
RSI (14)51.542.8
ADX (14)13.513.4
Price vs 50-day2.6%0.3%
Price vs 200-day13.8%8%
Volatility (1M, annualized)67.4%54.9%

Risk

Split
MetricDIODENTG
Beta2.513.38
Sharpe ratio1.091.06
Sortino ratio1.741.66
Max drawdown-38%-41.8%
Current drawdown-25.3%-25.3%
Annualized volatility67.3%68.2%
Value at risk (95%)-6.4%-7%

Straight answers

Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.

Which is better, DIOD or ENTG?

On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DIOD is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 47 against ENTG's 44. The edge comes from momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.

Is DIOD or ENTG the better buy right now?

DIOD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.

Why does the AIQ Score favor DIOD over ENTG?

The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DIOD leads Momentum by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.

Which has more analyst upside, DIOD or ENTG?

Analyst price targets imply +64.2% upside for DIOD and +25.4% for ENTG, so the Street currently favors DIOD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.

Which is better value, DIOD or ENTG?

Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.

Which has stronger growth, DIOD or ENTG?

DIOD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.

Which has stronger momentum, DIOD or ENTG?

DIOD on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.

Which is riskier, DIOD or ENTG?

ENTG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ENTG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.

Is DIOD more profitable than ENTG?

ENTG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 31.7% vs 45.5%; operating margin 4.8% vs 30%; ttm roe 4.5% vs 7.6%.

Is DIOD's lead over ENTG getting stronger or weaker?

DIOD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-10, when DIOD moved ahead of ENTG.

What would change the DIOD vs ENTG verdict?

The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ENTG closes the Momentum gap — currently 7 points behind, the largest single contributor to DIOD's edge; ENTG's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; DIOD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.

What do the current signals say about DIOD and ENTG?

DIOD: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. ENTG: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DIOD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ENTG it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).

Compare DIOD and ENTG with others

Continue your research

This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.

How this comparison is scored

The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.

The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.

How to use side-by-side comparison →

This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.