DIOD vs HIMX Stock Comparison

Compare DIOD and HIMX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.

Market data as of Sep 11, 2026 market close· AIQ score gap 6 points
DIOD
Technology
vs
HIMX
Technology
DIOD
Diodes Incorporated
Leads
Price
$95.01
Day move
+3.65%
AIQ Score
47/100
Best edge
Risk Resilience
Sector
Technology
HIMX
Himax Technologies, Inc.
Price
$14.73
Day move
+6.89%
AIQ Score
41/100
Best edge
Balanced
Sector
Technology

What is the main difference between DIOD and HIMX?

DIOD leads the current stock comparison as Diodes Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.

AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison

Diodes Incorporated vs Himax Technologies, Inc.

Data as of Sep 11, 2026· market close· Technology· Coverage 66/66 fields· High confidence
AIQ VerdictCompetitiveAIQ Comparison Conviction 5/10

DIOD leads

DIOD leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality. Wall Street currently favors HIMX on target upside.

Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support DIOD, and its current signal state is conflicted.

Evidence agreement: 4 of 6Comparison trend: Stable
DIOD

Diodes Incorporated

Leads
AIQ Score
47/100
AIQ Edge Score
4/10
HIMX

Himax Technologies, Inc.

AIQ Score
41/100
AIQ Edge Score
2/10

The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DIOD over HIMX, 47 versus 41 as of Sep 11, 2026. DIOD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality. DIOD also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors HIMX. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DIOD today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. DIOD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.

Compare Diodes Incorporated and Himax Technologies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.

Currently unavailable

Performance over time

Price-return comparison using available daily close history.

DIOD
-4.4%
HIMX
+19.0%

Total return comparison

Growth of $10,000

DIOD $9,556 · HIMX $11,900

Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.

Compare DIOD and HIMX against another ticker

Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.

Basic: 2 symbols·Explorer: 3 symbols·Pro and Premium: 5 symbols·Your limit: 2

AIQ Factor Divergence

Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.

DIOD advantage
0
HIMX advantage
  • Risk Resilience42 vs 31
    DIOD +11
  • Quality48 vs 38
    DIOD +10
  • Value46 vs 42
    DIOD +4
  • Momentum49 vs 50
    Even

4 of 6 evidence groups favor DIOD. DIOD’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality.

What changed since the last close

Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.

DIOD+2 AIQ

Largest factor move: Momentum +7

No new signals fired.

HIMX-3 AIQ

Largest factor move: Momentum -12

No new signals fired.

DIOD's lead widened by 5 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.

Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DIOD and HIMX both carry a full feed there.

The central trade-off

DIOD (Diodes Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.

HIMX (Himax Technologies, Inc.): the counter-case, on technicals, analyst expectations.

The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.

Which one fits your objective

The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.

Balanced

DIOD

DIOD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.

Growth

DIOD

DIOD on combined revenue and EPS growth.

Value

DIOD

DIOD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.

Momentum

Even

The two are level on Momentum.

Lower downside

DIOD

DIOD on Risk Resilience, by 11 points.

Analyst upside

HIMX

HIMX on implied upside to the consensus price target.

AIQ vs Wall Street

The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors DIOD, analyst targets favor HIMX. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.

MeasureDIODHIMXNote
Implied upside to target+64.2%+191.9%HIMX has more room
Target dispersion+46.2%0%Lower is tighter analyst agreement
ConsensusBuyBuyContext, not a primary driver
Analysts covering11Higher coverage generally improves confidence

The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.

Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.

AIQ Agreement Matrix

4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DIOD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.

Evidence groupFavorsReading
AIQ ScoreDIOD47 vs 41
FundamentalsDIODon balancerevenue growth 9.9% vs 14.2%; EPS growth 209.1% vs 139.1%; TTM ROE 4.5% vs 3.9%; gross margin 31.7% vs 31.1%; operating margin 4.8% vs 5% — DIOD takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them
ValuationDIODValue 46 vs 42
TechnicalsHIMXPrice vs 50-day 2.6% vs 6.8%; vs 200-day 13.8% vs 16%
Risk ResilienceDIODRisk Resilience 42 vs 31
Analyst expectationsHIMXTarget upside 64.2% vs 191.9%

✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DIOD and HIMX and are excluded from the count.

AIQ Decision Stability

Competitive

The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.

  • The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
  • The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
  • The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)

Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DIOD.

How the comparison changed

119 daily snapshots · May 4 Sep 10

DIOD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.

May 4DIOD leads above the line · HIMX leads belowSep 10
Today
DIOD +6
47 vs 41
7 sessions ago
DIOD +5
42 vs 37
30 sessions ago
DIOD +6
48 vs 42
90 sessions ago
DIOD +4
40 vs 36

The lead has not changed hands in this window.

AIQ Signal Divergence

Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.

DIODConflicted

1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted

  • Golden Cross Active bullish, trend, long horizon (14.97%)
  • ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.52%)
  • MACD Bearish Crossover bearish, momentum, short horizon
HIMX

2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral

  • Golden Cross Active bullish, trend, long horizon (16.16%)
  • Bollinger Band Squeeze neutral, volatility, short horizon
  • ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.67%)

DIOD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.

Price vs model alignment

Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.

DIODConfirmed strength

Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +3.65%, AIQ +2 points).

HIMXDivergence

Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +6.89%, AIQ -3 points).

What would flip this result

A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.

  1. 1HIMX closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 11 points behind, the largest single contributor to DIOD's edge.
  2. 2HIMX's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
  3. 3DIOD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
  4. 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.

The full evidence

Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.

Fundamentals

DIOD leads on balance
MetricDIODHIMX
Revenue growth (YoY)9.9%14.2%
EPS growth (YoY)209.1%139.1%
Gross margin31.7%31.1%
Operating margin4.8%5%
Return on equity (TTM)4.5%3.9%
Debt to equity0.040.66

Performance

Split across windows
MetricDIODHIMX
1 week (5 sessions)1.8%2.1%
1 month (20 sessions)-14.4%-8.7%
3 months (63 sessions)-8.8%-15.1%
6 months (126 sessions)43.8%50.6%
Year to date85.8%68.3%
1 year (252 sessions)72.1%63.5%

Technicals

HIMX has the stronger structure
MetricDIODHIMX
RSI (14)51.551.9
ADX (14)13.510.9
Price vs 50-day2.6%6.8%
Price vs 200-day13.8%16%
Volatility (1M, annualized)67.4%40.5%

Risk

DIOD is the more resilient
MetricDIODHIMX
Beta2.512.75
Sharpe ratio1.090.97
Sortino ratio1.741.64
Max drawdown-38%-51.9%
Current drawdown-25.3%-43%
Annualized volatility67.3%77.1%
Value at risk (95%)-6.4%-7%

Straight answers

Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.

Which is better, DIOD or HIMX?

On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DIOD is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 47 against HIMX's 41. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.

Is DIOD or HIMX the better buy right now?

DIOD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.

Why does the AIQ Score favor DIOD over HIMX?

The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DIOD leads Risk Resilience by 11 points; DIOD leads Quality by 10 points; DIOD leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.

Which has more analyst upside, DIOD or HIMX?

Analyst price targets imply +64.2% upside for DIOD and +191.9% for HIMX, so the Street currently favors HIMX. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors DIOD. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.

Which is better value, DIOD or HIMX?

DIOD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DIOD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.

Which has stronger growth, DIOD or HIMX?

DIOD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.

Which has stronger momentum, DIOD or HIMX?

The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.

Which is riskier, DIOD or HIMX?

DIOD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DIOD on Risk Resilience, by 11 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.

Is DIOD more profitable than HIMX?

DIOD leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 31.7% vs 31.1%; operating margin 4.8% vs 5%; ttm roe 4.5% vs 3.9%.

Is DIOD's lead over HIMX getting stronger or weaker?

DIOD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.

What would change the DIOD vs HIMX verdict?

The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: HIMX closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 11 points behind, the largest single contributor to DIOD's edge; HIMX's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; DIOD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.

What do the current signals say about DIOD and HIMX?

DIOD: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. HIMX: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DIOD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On HIMX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).

Compare DIOD and HIMX with others

Continue your research

This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.

How this comparison is scored

The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.

The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.

How to use side-by-side comparison →

This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.