DKNG vs WYNN Stock Comparison
WYNN currently leads DKNG in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 44 vs 31. The clearest difference is quality, while DKNG has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between DKNG and WYNN?
WYNN leads the current stock comparison as Wynn Resorts, Limited, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
DraftKings Inc. vs Wynn Resorts, Limited
WYNN leads
WYNN leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 17 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support WYNN, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
DraftKings Inc.
Wynn Resorts, Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors WYNN over DKNG, 44 versus 31 as of Oct 21, 2026. WYNN's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while DKNG holds the stronger momentum profile. WYNN also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor WYNN today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. WYNN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
Compare DraftKings Inc. and Wynn Resorts, Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DKNG and WYNN against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality18 vs 47WYNN +29
- Value29 vs 46WYNN +17
- Risk Resilience27 vs 44WYNN +17
- Momentum51 vs 39DKNG +12
4 of 6 evidence groups favor WYNN. WYNN’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; DKNG keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
WYNN's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DKNG and WYNN both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
WYNN (Wynn Resorts, Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
DKNG (DraftKings Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 55.5% against 29.9%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
WYNNWYNN on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
WYNNWYNN on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
WYNNWYNN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
DKNGDKNG on the Momentum factor, by 12 points.
Lower downside
WYNNWYNN on Risk Resilience, by 17 points.
Analyst upside
WYNNWYNN on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DKNG | WYNN | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +64.1% | +74.8% | WYNN has more room |
| Target dispersion | +65.3% | +31% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 16 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor WYNN. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | WYNN | 31 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth -4.2% vs 17.1%; TTM ROE -26.3% vs -174.9%; gross margin 40.5% vs 38.6%; operating margin -2.9% vs 16.1% |
| Valuation | WYNN | Value 29 vs 46 |
| Technicals | DKNG | Price vs 50-day -9.1% vs -12.9%; vs 200-day -17.5% vs -22.7% |
| Risk Resilience | WYNN | Risk Resilience 27 vs 44 |
| Analyst expectations | WYNN | Target upside 64.1% vs 74.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DKNG and WYNN and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on WYNN.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20WYNN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- WYNN +13
- 31 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- WYNN +18
- 25 vs 43
- 30 sessions ago
- WYNN +17
- 24 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- WYNN +21
- 30 vs 51
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only DKNG
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.08%)
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
WYNN leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.24%, AIQ +2 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.18%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DKNG closes the Quality gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to WYNN's edge.
- 2DKNG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3WYNN's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate WYNN's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | DKNG | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -12.3% | 0% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -4.2% | 17.1% |
| Gross margin | 40.5% | 38.6% |
| Operating margin | -2.9% | 16.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -26.3% | -174.9% |
| Debt to equity | 3.36 | -72.84 |
Performance
DKNG leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | DKNG | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.9% | 2.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -6.1% | -6.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -10.3% | -17.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -10.9% | -28.1% |
| Year to date | -40.6% | -35.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -41.8% | -33.2% |
Technicals
DKNG has the stronger structure| Metric | DKNG | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 60.2 | 44.1 |
| ADX (14) | 21.5 | 44.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -9.1% | -12.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -17.5% | -22.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 55.5% | 29.9% |
Risk
WYNN is the more resilient| Metric | DKNG | WYNN |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.65 | 0.89 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.79 | -1.27 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.14 | -2.13 |
| Max drawdown | -48.7% | -44.6% |
| Current drawdown | -43.5% | -41.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 52.4% | 32.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.7% | -3.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DKNG or WYNN?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, WYNN is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 44 against DKNG's 31. The edge comes from quality and value. DKNG is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DKNG or WYNN the better buy right now?
WYNN carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor WYNN over DKNG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. WYNN leads Quality by 29 points; WYNN leads Value by 17 points; WYNN leads Risk Resilience by 17 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DKNG or WYNN?
Analyst price targets imply +64.1% upside for DKNG and +74.8% for WYNN, so the Street currently favors WYNN. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DKNG or WYNN?
WYNN is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. WYNN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DKNG or WYNN?
WYNN on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DKNG or WYNN?
DKNG on the Momentum factor, by 12 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DKNG or WYNN?
WYNN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. WYNN on Risk Resilience, by 17 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DKNG more profitable than WYNN?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 40.5% vs 38.6%; operating margin -2.9% vs 16.1%; ttm roe -26.3% vs -174.9%. DKNG leads on two measures and WYNN on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is WYNN's lead over DKNG getting stronger or weaker?
WYNN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the DKNG vs WYNN verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DKNG closes the Quality gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to WYNN's edge; DKNG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; WYNN's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate WYNN's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about DKNG and WYNN?
DKNG: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. WYNN: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DKNG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On WYNN it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare DKNG and WYNN with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.