DOX vs DUOL Stock Comparison
DOX currently leads DUOL in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 65 vs 64. The clearest difference is momentum, while DUOL has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between DOX and DUOL?
DOX leads the current stock comparison as Amdocs Limited, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Amdocs Limited vs Duolingo, Inc.
DOX leads
DOX leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from DUOL.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support DOX, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Amdocs Limited
Duolingo, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DOX over DUOL, 65 versus 64 as of Oct 21, 2026. DOX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while DUOL holds the stronger quality profile. DOX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DOX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. DOX lead: Reversed — DUOL led by 14 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; DOX now leads by 1.
Compare Amdocs Limited and Duolingo, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DOX and DUOL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality56 vs 89DUOL +33
- Momentum73 vs 43DOX +30
- Value74 vs 60DOX +14
- Risk Resilience54 vs 58DUOL +4
2 of 6 evidence groups favor DOX. DOX’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; DUOL keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
The lead changed hands: DOX moved ahead of DUOL in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DOX and DUOL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DOX (Amdocs Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
DUOL (Duolingo, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience, fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 52.8% against 20.3%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DOXDOX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DUOLDUOL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DOXDOX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points.
Momentum
DOXDOX on the Momentum factor, by 30 points.
Lower downside
DUOLDUOL on Risk Resilience, by 4 points.
Analyst upside
DOXDOX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DOX | DUOL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +15.3% | -8% | DOX has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +102.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DOX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 65 vs 64 |
| Fundamentals | DUOLon balance | revenue growth 0.2% vs 2.2%; EPS growth -54.3% vs -23.7%; TTM ROE 13.5% vs 30.1%; gross margin 37.8% vs 72.3%; operating margin 17.5% vs 14.2% — DUOL takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DOX | Value 74 vs 60 |
| Technicals | DUOL | Price vs 50-day 2.7% vs -5.5%; vs 200-day -4.3% vs 11.5% |
| Risk Resilience | DUOL | Risk Resilience 54 vs 58 |
| Analyst expectations | DOX | Target upside 15.3% vs -8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DOX and DUOL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DOX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20DOX lead: Reversed — DUOL led by 14 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; DOX now leads by 1.
- Today
- DOX +1
- 65 vs 64
- 7 sessions ago
- DUOL +5
- 65 vs 70
- 30 sessions ago
- DUOL +14
- 54 vs 68
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 61 vs 61
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 20 when DOX moved ahead of DUOL.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only DOX
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (5.78%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only DUOL
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (16.05%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.74%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
DOX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.31%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.62%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DUOL closes the Momentum gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to DOX's edge.
- 2DUOL's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3DOX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DUOL leads on balance| Metric | DOX | DUOL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.2% | 2.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -54.3% | -23.7% |
| Gross margin | 37.8% | 72.3% |
| Operating margin | 17.5% | 14.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 13.5% | 30.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.33 | 0.06 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | DOX | DUOL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4% | -0.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 4.5% | -5.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 16% | 16.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -7.5% | 36% |
| Year to date | -23.7% | -20.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -25.6% | -57.8% |
Technicals
DUOL has the stronger structure| Metric | DOX | DUOL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 73.3 | 46.9 |
| ADX (14) | 20.9 | 10.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2.7% | -5.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -4.3% | 11.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 20.3% | 52.8% |
Risk
DUOL is the more resilient| Metric | DOX | DUOL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.28 | 0.64 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.03 | -1.07 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.37 | -1.35 |
| Max drawdown | -41.7% | -72.2% |
| Current drawdown | -28.2% | -56.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 29.1% | 63.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DOX or DUOL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DOX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 65 against DUOL's 64. The edge comes from momentum and value. DUOL is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DOX or DUOL the better buy right now?
DOX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DOX over DUOL?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DUOL leads Quality by 33 points; DOX leads Momentum by 30 points; DOX leads Value by 14 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DOX or DUOL?
Analyst price targets imply +15.3% upside for DOX and -8% for DUOL, so the Street currently favors DOX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DOX or DUOL?
DOX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DOX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DOX or DUOL?
DUOL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DOX or DUOL?
DOX on the Momentum factor, by 30 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DOX or DUOL?
DUOL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DUOL on Risk Resilience, by 4 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DOX more profitable than DUOL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 37.8% vs 72.3%; operating margin 17.5% vs 14.2%; ttm roe 13.5% vs 30.1%. DOX leads on one measure and DUOL on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is DOX's lead over DUOL getting stronger or weaker?
DOX lead: Reversed — DUOL led by 14 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; DOX now leads by 1. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-20, when DOX moved ahead of DUOL.
What would change the DOX vs DUOL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DUOL closes the Momentum gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to DOX's edge; DUOL's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; DOX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DOX and DUOL?
DOX: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. DUOL: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DOX is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On DUOL it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DOX and DUOL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.