DOX vs FROG Stock Comparison
Compare DOX and FROG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DOX and FROG?
DOX leads the current stock comparison as Amdocs Limited, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Amdocs Limited vs JFrog Ltd.
DOX leads
DOX leads by 22 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 10 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support DOX, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Amdocs Limited
JFrog Ltd.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DOX over FROG, 65 versus 43 as of Sep 6, 2026. DOX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while FROG holds the stronger quality profile. DOX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DOX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. DOX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 22 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Amdocs Limited and JFrog Ltd. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DOX and FROG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%74 vs 24DOX +50
- Momentum25%72 vs 39DOX +33
- Quality30%56 vs 60FROG +4
- Risk Resilience15%53 vs 52Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor DOX. DOX’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; FROG keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
DOX's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DOX and FROG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DOX (Amdocs Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
FROG (JFrog Ltd.): the counter-case, on quality, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 74.5% against 22.3%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DOXDOX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
FROGFROG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DOXDOX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 50 points.
Momentum
DOXDOX on the Momentum factor, by 33 points.
Lower downside
DOXDOX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
DOXDOX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DOX | FROG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.1% | +11.1% | DOX has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +61.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 16 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DOX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DOX | 65 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth -54.3% vs 56.4%; TTM ROE 13.5% vs -4.9%; gross margin 37.8% vs 77.9%; operating margin 17.5% vs -11.2% |
| Valuation | DOX | Value 74 vs 24 |
| Technicals | FROG | Price vs 50-day 10.7% vs -1.7%; vs 200-day -6.2% vs 33.4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 53 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | DOX | Target upside 14.1% vs 11.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DOX and FROG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 22 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DOX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5DOX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 22 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DOX +22
- 65 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- DOX +13
- 65 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- DOX +10
- 63 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 53 vs 53
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (17.97%)
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (35.72%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.68%)
DOX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.69%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.32%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1FROG closes the Value gap — currently 50 points behind, the largest single contributor to DOX's edge.
- 2FROG's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3DOX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | DOX | FROG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.2% | 6.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -54.3% | 56.4% |
| Gross margin | 37.8% | 77.9% |
| Operating margin | 17.5% | -11.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 13.5% | -4.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.33 | 0.02 |
Performance
FROG leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | DOX | FROG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.1% | -11.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 6.3% | -2.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 3% | 4.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -10.8% | 115.8% |
| Year to date | -22.7% | 40.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -26.5% | 83.4% |
Technicals
FROG has the stronger structure| Metric | DOX | FROG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 79.5 | 41.9 |
| ADX (14) | 31.3 | 20.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 10.7% | -1.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -6.2% | 33.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 22.3% | 74.5% |
Risk
Split| Metric | DOX | FROG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.3 | 1.42 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.08 | 1.12 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.41 | 1.79 |
| Max drawdown | -42% | -49.6% |
| Current drawdown | -27.7% | -15.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 28.5% | 72.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -5.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DOX or FROG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DOX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 65 against FROG's 43. The edge comes from value and momentum. FROG is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DOX or FROG the better buy right now?
DOX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DOX over FROG?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. DOX leads Value by 50 points; DOX leads Momentum by 33 points; FROG leads Quality by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DOX or FROG?
Analyst price targets imply +14.1% upside for DOX and +11.1% for FROG, so the Street currently favors DOX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DOX or FROG?
DOX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DOX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 50 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DOX or FROG?
FROG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DOX or FROG?
DOX on the Momentum factor, by 33 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DOX or FROG?
DOX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DOX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DOX more profitable than FROG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 37.8% vs 77.9%; operating margin 17.5% vs -11.2%; ttm roe 13.5% vs -4.9%. DOX leads on two measures and FROG on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is DOX's lead over FROG getting stronger or weaker?
DOX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 22 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the DOX vs FROG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: FROG closes the Value gap — currently 50 points behind, the largest single contributor to DOX's edge; FROG's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; DOX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DOX and FROG?
DOX: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. FROG: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DOX is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On FROG it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DOX and FROG with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.