DSP vs EBAY Stock Comparison
Compare DSP and EBAY across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DSP and EBAY?
DSP leads the current stock comparison as Viant Technology Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Viant Technology Inc. vs eBay Inc.
DSP leads
DSP leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, but the lead has narrowed from 12 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support DSP, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Viant Technology Inc.
eBay Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DSP over EBAY, 61 versus 55 as of Sep 11, 2026. DSP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while EBAY holds the stronger quality profile. DSP also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DSP today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. DSP lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Viant Technology Inc. and eBay Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DSP and EBAY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value59 vs 40DSP +19
- Quality59 vs 77EBAY +18
- Momentum65 vs 50DSP +15
- Risk Resilience59 vs 48DSP +11
5 of 6 evidence groups favor DSP. DSP’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; EBAY keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +2
New signals
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
DSP's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DSP and EBAY both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DSP (Viant Technology Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
EBAY (eBay Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DSPDSP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DSPDSP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DSPDSP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points.
Momentum
DSPDSP on the Momentum factor, by 15 points.
Lower downside
DSPDSP on Risk Resilience, by 11 points.
Analyst upside
DSPDSP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DSP | EBAY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +41.5% | +8.5% | DSP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +22.5% | +45.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 19 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DSP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DSP | 61 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | EBAYon balance | revenue growth 17.8% vs 1.5%; EPS growth 95.3% vs 8.8%; TTM ROE 11.4% vs 48.3%; gross margin 44.5% vs 72.5%; operating margin 2.3% vs 20.5% — EBAY takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DSP | Value 59 vs 40 |
| Technicals | DSP | Price vs 50-day 0.5% vs -1.1%; vs 200-day 10.4% vs 6.1% |
| Risk Resilience | DSP | Risk Resilience 59 vs 48 |
| Analyst expectations | DSP | Target upside 41.5% vs 8.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DSP and EBAY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DSP.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10DSP lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DSP +6
- 61 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- DSP +6
- 62 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- DSP +12
- 62 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- DSP +1
- 63 vs 62
The lead changed hands 10 times in this window, most recently on Aug 3 when DSP moved ahead of EBAY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (8.50%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (10.07%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
DSP leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.26%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.59%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1EBAY closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to DSP's edge.
- 2EBAY's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3DSP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate DSP's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
EBAY leads on balance| Metric | DSP | EBAY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 17.8% | 1.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 95.3% | 8.8% |
| Gross margin | 44.5% | 72.5% |
| Operating margin | 2.3% | 20.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.4% | 48.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0.2 | 1.53 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | DSP | EBAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.9% | -1.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.1% | 2.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 10% | -1.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 14.9% | 14.6% |
| Year to date | 5.8% | 20.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 23.6% | 12.9% |
Technicals
DSP has the stronger structure| Metric | DSP | EBAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 54.4 | 50.9 |
| ADX (14) | 18.8 | 14.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.5% | -1.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 10.4% | 6.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 41% | 28.6% |
Risk
DSP is the more resilient| Metric | DSP | EBAY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.41 | 0.73 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.61 | 0.43 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.02 | 0.51 |
| Max drawdown | -31% | -20.3% |
| Current drawdown | -9.6% | -11.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 62.5% | 35.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.6% | -3.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DSP or EBAY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DSP is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 61 against EBAY's 55. The edge comes from value and momentum. EBAY is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DSP or EBAY the better buy right now?
DSP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DSP over EBAY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DSP leads Value by 19 points; EBAY leads Quality by 18 points; DSP leads Momentum by 15 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DSP or EBAY?
Analyst price targets imply +41.5% upside for DSP and +8.5% for EBAY, so the Street currently favors DSP. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DSP or EBAY?
DSP is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DSP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DSP or EBAY?
DSP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DSP or EBAY?
DSP on the Momentum factor, by 15 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DSP or EBAY?
DSP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DSP on Risk Resilience, by 11 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DSP more profitable than EBAY?
EBAY leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 44.5% vs 72.5%; operating margin 2.3% vs 20.5%; ttm roe 11.4% vs 48.3%.
Is DSP's lead over EBAY getting stronger or weaker?
DSP lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 10 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-03, when DSP moved ahead of EBAY.
What would change the DSP vs EBAY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: EBAY closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to DSP's edge; EBAY's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; DSP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate DSP's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about DSP and EBAY?
DSP: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. EBAY: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DSP is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On EBAY it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DSP and EBAY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.