DSP vs ETSY Stock Comparison
Compare DSP and ETSY across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DSP and ETSY?
DSP leads the current stock comparison as Viant Technology Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Viant Technology Inc. vs Etsy, Inc.
DSP leads
DSP leads by 24 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 17 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 6 of 6 evidence groups support DSP, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Viant Technology Inc.
Etsy, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DSP over ETSY, 61 versus 37 as of Sep 11, 2026. DSP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and momentum. DSP also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 6 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DSP today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. DSP lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 24 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Viant Technology Inc. and Etsy, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DSP and ETSY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience59 vs 22DSP +37
- Momentum65 vs 29DSP +36
- Value59 vs 27DSP +32
- Quality59 vs 60Even
6 of 6 evidence groups favor DSP. DSP’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +2
New signals
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
DSP's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DSP and ETSY both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DSPDSP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DSPDSP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DSPDSP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points.
Momentum
DSPDSP on the Momentum factor, by 36 points.
Lower downside
DSPDSP on Risk Resilience, by 37 points.
Analyst upside
DSPDSP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DSP | ETSY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +41.5% | +11.3% | DSP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +22.5% | +56.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 16 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
6 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DSP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DSP | 61 vs 37 |
| Fundamentals | DSPon balance | revenue growth 17.8% vs 5.9%; EPS growth 95.3% vs -168.1%; TTM ROE 11.4% vs -17.7%; gross margin 44.5% vs 72.3%; operating margin 2.3% vs 16% — DSP takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DSP | Value 59 vs 27 |
| Technicals | DSP | Price vs 50-day 0.5% vs -10.1%; vs 200-day 10.4% vs 11.5% |
| Risk Resilience | DSP | Risk Resilience 59 vs 22 |
| Analyst expectations | DSP | Target upside 41.5% vs 11.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DSP and ETSY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 24 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 6 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DSP.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10DSP lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 24 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DSP +24
- 61 vs 37
- 7 sessions ago
- DSP +22
- 62 vs 40
- 30 sessions ago
- DSP +17
- 62 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- DSP +15
- 63 vs 48
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (8.50%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (26.05%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
DSP leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.26%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.63%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ETSY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to DSP's edge.
- 2ETSY's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3DSP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DSP leads on balance| Metric | DSP | ETSY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 17.8% | 5.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 95.3% | -168.1% |
| Gross margin | 44.5% | 72.3% |
| Operating margin | 2.3% | 16% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.4% | -17.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.2 | -2.2 |
Performance
DSP leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | DSP | ETSY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.9% | -12.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.1% | -10.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 10% | 4.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 14.9% | 35.9% |
| Year to date | 5.8% | 29.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 23.6% | 23% |
Technicals
DSP has the stronger structure| Metric | DSP | ETSY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 54.4 | 32.6 |
| ADX (14) | 18.8 | 17.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.5% | -10.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 10.4% | 11.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 41% | 46.7% |
Risk
DSP is the more resilient| Metric | DSP | ETSY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.41 | 1.13 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.61 | 0.65 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.02 | 0.94 |
| Max drawdown | -31% | -41.1% |
| Current drawdown | -9.6% | -17.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 62.5% | 53.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.6% | -5.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DSP or ETSY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DSP is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 61 against ETSY's 37. The edge comes from risk resilience and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DSP or ETSY the better buy right now?
DSP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 6 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DSP over ETSY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DSP leads Risk Resilience by 37 points; DSP leads Momentum by 36 points; DSP leads Value by 32 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DSP or ETSY?
Analyst price targets imply +41.5% upside for DSP and +11.3% for ETSY, so the Street currently favors DSP. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DSP or ETSY?
DSP is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DSP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DSP or ETSY?
DSP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DSP or ETSY?
DSP on the Momentum factor, by 36 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DSP or ETSY?
DSP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DSP on Risk Resilience, by 37 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DSP more profitable than ETSY?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 44.5% vs 72.3%; operating margin 2.3% vs 16%; ttm roe 11.4% vs -17.7%. DSP leads on one measure and ETSY on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is DSP's lead over ETSY getting stronger or weaker?
DSP lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 24 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the DSP vs ETSY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ETSY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to DSP's edge; ETSY's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; DSP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DSP and ETSY?
DSP: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. ETSY: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DSP is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ETSY it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DSP and ETSY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.