DSP vs ETSY Stock Comparison
DSP currently leads ETSY in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 64 vs 50. The clearest difference is risk resilience.
What is the main difference between DSP and ETSY?
DSP leads the current stock comparison as Viant Technology Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Viant Technology Inc. vs Etsy, Inc.
DSP leads
DSP leads by 14 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 20 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support DSP, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Viant Technology Inc.
Etsy, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DSP over ETSY, 64 versus 50 as of Oct 31, 2026. DSP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value. DSP also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DSP today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. DSP lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 20 to 14 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Viant Technology Inc. and Etsy, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare DSP and ETSY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience61 vs 24DSP +37
- Value59 vs 27DSP +32
- Momentum79 vs 81Even
- Quality59 vs 60Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor DSP. DSP’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (2.0%)
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
DSP's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DSP and ETSY both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DSP (Viant Technology Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and value.
ETSY (Etsy, Inc.): the counter-case, on technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 50.7% against 43.3%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DSPDSP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DSPDSP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DSPDSP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
DSPDSP on Risk Resilience, by 37 points.
Analyst upside
DSPDSP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DSP | ETSY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +42.2% | -1.9% | DSP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +19.2% | +43.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 16 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DSP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DSP | 64 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | DSPon balance | revenue growth 17.8% vs 5.9%; EPS growth 95.3% vs -168.1%; TTM ROE 11.4% vs -17.7%; gross margin 44.5% vs 72.3%; operating margin 2.3% vs 16% — DSP takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DSP | Value 59 vs 27 |
| Technicals | ETSY | Price vs 50-day 0.5% vs 13.5%; vs 200-day 21.7% vs 35.9% |
| Risk Resilience | DSP | Risk Resilience 61 vs 24 |
| Analyst expectations | DSP | Target upside 42.2% vs -1.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DSP and ETSY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 14 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DSP.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28DSP lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 20 to 14 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DSP +14
- 64 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- DSP +13
- 64 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- DSP +20
- 63 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- DSP +14
- 60 vs 46
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only DSP
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only ETSY
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 7 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, RSI Overbought, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, 52-Week High Proximity, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
DSP leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.82%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.87%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ETSY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to DSP's edge.
- 2ETSY's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3DSP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 14-point move would eliminate DSP's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DSP leads on balance| Metric | DSP | ETSY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 17.8% | 5.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 95.3% | -168.1% |
| Gross margin | 44.5% | 72.3% |
| Operating margin | 2.3% | 16% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.4% | -17.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.2 | -2.2 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | DSP | ETSY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 5.6% | 5.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 16.2% | 29.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 25.2% | 11.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 34.8% | 32.7% |
| Year to date | 16.2% | 58.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 56.3% | 25% |
Technicals
ETSY has the stronger structure| Metric | DSP | ETSY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 70.1 | 73.6 |
| ADX (14) | 14.8 | 35.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.5% | 13.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 21.7% | 35.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 43.3% | 50.7% |
Risk
DSP is the more resilient| Metric | DSP | ETSY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.05 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.96 | 0.6 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.44 | 0.84 |
| Max drawdown | -31% | -41.1% |
| Current drawdown | 0% | 0% |
| Annualized volatility | 67.4% | 50.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.6% | -4.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DSP or ETSY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DSP is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 64 against ETSY's 50. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DSP or ETSY the better buy right now?
DSP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DSP over ETSY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DSP leads Risk Resilience by 37 points; DSP leads Value by 32 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DSP or ETSY?
Analyst price targets imply +42.2% upside for DSP and -1.9% for ETSY, so the Street currently favors DSP. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DSP or ETSY?
DSP is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DSP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DSP or ETSY?
DSP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DSP or ETSY?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DSP or ETSY?
DSP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DSP on Risk Resilience, by 37 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DSP more profitable than ETSY?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 44.5% vs 72.3%; operating margin 2.3% vs 16%; ttm roe 11.4% vs -17.7%. DSP leads on one measure and ETSY on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is DSP's lead over ETSY getting stronger or weaker?
DSP lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 20 to 14 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the DSP vs ETSY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ETSY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to DSP's edge; ETSY's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; DSP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 14-point move would eliminate DSP's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about DSP and ETSY?
DSP: 5 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. ETSY: 6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DSP is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ETSY it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DSP and ETSY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.