DTE vs ES Stock Comparison
Compare DTE and ES across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DTE and ES?
ES leads the current stock comparison as Eversource Energy, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
DTE Energy Company vs Eversource Energy
ES leads
ES leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 4 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors DTE on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support ES, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
DTE Energy Company
Eversource Energy
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ES over DTE, 42 versus 41 as of Sep 11, 2026. ES's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience. ES also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors DTE. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ES today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. ES lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare DTE Energy Company and Eversource Energy across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DTE and ES against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value57 vs 63ES +6
- Risk Resilience52 vs 56ES +4
- Momentum31 vs 28Even
- Quality27 vs 27Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor ES. ES’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -13
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
ES's lead narrowed by 4 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DTE and ES both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ES (Eversource Energy): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
DTE (DTE Energy Company): the counter-case, on fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ESES on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DTEDTE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
ESES on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
ESES on Risk Resilience, by 4 points.
Analyst upside
DTEDTE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors ES, analyst targets favor DTE. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | DTE | ES | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +18.5% | +7.7% | DTE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +18.5% | +5.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ES. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 41 vs 42 |
| Fundamentals | DTEon balance | revenue growth -35.1% vs -35.5%; EPS growth 14.3% vs -91.3%; TTM ROE 10.8% vs 8.9%; gross margin 36.7% vs 35.2%; operating margin 12.3% vs 22.3% — DTE takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | ES | Value 57 vs 63 |
| Technicals | ES | Price vs 50-day -6.9% vs -5.6%; vs 200-day -4.4% vs -1.7% |
| Risk Resilience | ES | Risk Resilience 52 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | DTE | Target upside 18.5% vs 7.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DTE and ES and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ES.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10ES lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ES +1
- 41 vs 42
- 7 sessions ago
- ES +8
- 39 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- ES +4
- 41 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- ES +4
- 51 vs 55
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jun 10 when DTE moved ahead of ES.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.68%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.40%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
ES leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.31%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.68%, AIQ -4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DTE closes the Value gap — currently 6 points behind, the largest single contributor to ES's edge.
- 2DTE's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3ES's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate ES's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DTE leads on balance| Metric | DTE | ES |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -35.1% | -35.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 14.3% | -91.3% |
| Gross margin | 36.7% | 35.2% |
| Operating margin | 12.3% | 22.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.8% | 8.9% |
| Debt to equity | 2.29 | 1.82 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | DTE | ES |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.3% | -2.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.1% | -3.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8% | -0.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -8.3% | -6.7% |
| Year to date | 4.2% | 2.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -0.3% | 9.8% |
Technicals
ES has the stronger structure| Metric | DTE | ES |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.4 | 34.5 |
| ADX (14) | 17.4 | 17.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.9% | -5.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -4.4% | -1.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 13.6% | 17.5% |
Risk
ES is the more resilient| Metric | DTE | ES |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.02 | 0.09 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.18 | 0.28 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.28 | 0.31 |
| Max drawdown | -13% | -15.1% |
| Current drawdown | -13% | -9.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 17.1% | 24.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.8% | -2.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DTE or ES?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ES is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 42 against DTE's 41. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DTE or ES the better buy right now?
ES carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ES over DTE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ES leads Value by 6 points; ES leads Risk Resilience by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DTE or ES?
Analyst price targets imply +18.5% upside for DTE and +7.7% for ES, so the Street currently favors DTE. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors ES. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DTE or ES?
ES is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ES on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DTE or ES?
DTE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DTE or ES?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DTE or ES?
ES is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ES on Risk Resilience, by 4 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DTE more profitable than ES?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 36.7% vs 35.2%; operating margin 12.3% vs 22.3%; ttm roe 10.8% vs 8.9%. DTE leads on two measures and ES on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is ES's lead over DTE getting stronger or weaker?
ES lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-06-10, when DTE moved ahead of ES.
What would change the DTE vs ES verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DTE closes the Value gap — currently 6 points behind, the largest single contributor to ES's edge; DTE's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; ES's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate ES's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about DTE and ES?
DTE: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. ES: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DTE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ES it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DTE and ES with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.