DUHP vs VTI: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
DUHP and VTI are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. DUHP is U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares, while VTI is Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF. VTI is broader by holdings count, with 3,524 positions versus 161 for DUHP. DUHP is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has VTI ahead on AIQ Score, 60 versus 59.
What is the main difference between DUHP and VTI?
VTI holds 3,524 positions to DUHP's 161, and 39% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | DUHP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.24% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | 161 | 3,524 |
| Top-10 concentration | 43% | 33.2% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 0.84% | 1.05% |
| Average volume | 812,057 | 3,115,564 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | +13.4% | +15.8% |
| YTD return | +11.9% | +12.5% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 11.8% | 13% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -9.2% | -9.2% |
| Beta | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.17 | 1.32 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Momentum | 73/100 | 51/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 85/100 | 86/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
VTI leads
VTI leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value.
Fragile: 1 of 4 evidence groups support VTI, and its current signal state is conflicted.
U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors VTI over DUHP, 60 versus 59 as of Oct 21, 2026. VTI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while DUHP holds the stronger momentum profile. VTI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 4 covered evidence groups favor VTI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. VTI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
DUHP vs VTI: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | DUHP | VTI | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.24% | 0.03% | VTI |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 161 | 3,524 | VTI |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 43% | 33.2% | VTI |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 0.84% | 1.05% | VTI |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 1 year | -9.2% | -9.2% | Similar |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 11.8% | 13% | DUHP |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DUHP and VTI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum73 vs 51DUHP +22
- Quality58 vs 74VTI +16
- Value35 vs 42VTI +7
- Risk Resilience85 vs 86Even
1 of 4 evidence groups favor VTI. VTI’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; DUHP keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
VTI's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DUHP and VTI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
DUHP (U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares): the counter-case, on momentum.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | DUHP | VTI | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.24% | 0.03% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 161 | 3,524 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 812,057 | 3,115,564 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 11.8% | 13% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -9.2% | -9.2% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.76 | 0.86 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.87 | 1.02 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
Where the exposure actually sits
Sector exposure for each fund, ordered by the size of the difference.
How much of the same holdings they own
DUHP and VTI share 39.18% of their weighted exposure across 156 common holdings.
4 holdings are unique to DUHP, and 3,343 holdings are unique to VTI. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
DUHP is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 43% of the fund, against 33.24% for VTI (161 holdings vs 3,524). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
Largest shared positions
| Holding | DUHP | VTI | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 7.79% | 6.4% | 6.4% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 7.3% | 6.29% | 6.29% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 5.01% | 4.79% | 4.79% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.69% | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| LLYELI LILLY AND COMPANY | 4.4% | 1.35% | 1.35% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC. | 3.78% | 1.29% | 1.29% |
| VVISA INC | 4.22% | 0.83% | 0.83% |
| MAMASTERCARD INC - A | 2.37% | 0.63% | 0.63% |
Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.
What DUHP adds that VTI doesn’t
| Holding | DUHP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| LLYELI LILLY AND COMPANY | 4.4% | 1.35% |
| VVISA INC | 4.22% | 0.83% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC. | 3.78% | 1.29% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.69% | 1.7% |
| MAMASTERCARD INC - A | 2.37% | 0.63% |
| CATCATERPILLAR INC. | 2.3% | 0.52% |
What VTI adds that DUHP doesn’t
| Holding | VTI | DUHP |
|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 3.65% | Not held |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.9% | Not held |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.56% | Not held |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.31% | Not held |
| JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.31% | Not held |
| BRK-BBerkshire Hathaway Inc | 1.28% | Not held |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
DUHP vs VTI: five-year payout growth
VTI grew its split-adjusted payout at 6.28% a year over 2020-2025. DUHP began paying distributions in 2022, so it has no 2020-2025 growth rate to compare.
| Dividend metric | DUHP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 annual payout | $0.388 | $3.757 |
| Peer rank | not ranked | #81 of 138 |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 4 covered evidence groups favor VTI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 59 vs 60 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | VTI | Value 35 vs 42 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day 1.2% vs 0.2%; vs 200-day 5.7% vs 5.3% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 85 vs 86 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DUHP and VTI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on VTI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20VTI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- VTI +1
- 59 vs 60
- 7 sessions ago
- VTI +2
- 57 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- VTI +3
- 57 vs 60
- 90 sessions ago
- VTI +7
- 59 vs 66
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only DUHP
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only VTI
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Contraction - Coiling, 52-Week High Proximity, MACD Bearish Crossover.
VTI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.49%, AIQ +2 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.55%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DUHP closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to VTI's edge.
- 2DUHP generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3VTI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
DUHP leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | DUHP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.2% | -1.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.3% | -1.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 9.2% | 8.4% |
| Year to date | 11.9% | 12.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 13.4% | 15.8% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | DUHP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 63.2 | 55.2 |
| ADX (14) | 8.1 | 13.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.7% | 5.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 8.1% | 9.8% |
Risk
Split| Metric | DUHP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.87 | 1.02 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.76 | 0.86 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.17 | 1.32 |
| Max drawdown | -9.2% | -9.2% |
| Current drawdown | -0.8% | -1.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 11.8% | 13% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.3% | -1.4% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between DUHP and VTI?
VTI holds 3,524 positions to DUHP's 161, and 39% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do DUHP and VTI overlap?
DUHP and VTI share 39.18% of their weighted exposure across 156 common holdings. 4 holdings are unique to DUHP, and 3,343 holdings are unique to VTI. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, DUHP or VTI?
VTI holds more positions: 3,524 versus 161 for DUHP.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
VTI has the lower expense ratio, 0.03% a year against 0.24% for DUHP.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
VTI, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 1.05% against 0.84% for DUHP.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
VTI has been more volatile over the past year, at 13% annualized against 11.8% for DUHP.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
Their worst peak-to-trough falls over the past year are similar: -9.2% for DUHP and -9.2% for VTI.
Compare DUHP and VTI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.